Warrior General Games

I will represent the Manchester Red Devils

I'll do it for the Scorpions, especially if we establish the rules for the voting. This thread leaves things open to interpretation.

Originally posted by pangloss
Dont get so hasty there Jacobby, first
1 Berlin Storm
2 Foy Destroyers
3 Munich Beer Drinkers
4 Aalborg Powerpigs
6 Lisbon Goons
7 MANCHESTER RED DEVILS
8 Swedish Glaciers
9 Schuylkill River Sharks
10 Turin Colonels nuagerounder
11 Tottenham Honey Badgers
12 Lewisburg Dragons
13 Vienna Danube River Raiders
14 Cardiff Dragons
15 London Monarchs
16 Rome Gladiators
Zeta Conference Standings
Team Record Streak
1 Lyon Hippos
2 Marcy Projects
3 Manchester Devils
4 Hungary Hungry Hippos
5 Wicklow Warriors
6 Death Valley Scorpions
7 Valencia Galleons
8 Leavenworth Inmates
9 Filthy Few Armadillos
10 Loch Ness Monsters
11 Wichita Wild
12 Munich Owls
13 Boston Packers
14 Whitechapel Slashers
15 South Yorkshire Thrashers
16 Dublin Warriort,
I need to hear one person to nominate from each team

I will update when a team posts me who is gonna nominatee for them!!

River Raiders checking in.

I will vote for the Dublin Warriors... even though i am gone at the end of the season i am not even sure any of those guys read these forums.

Originally posted by SanDiegoBoltFan
I'll do it for the Scorpions, especially if we establish the rules for the voting. This thread leaves things open to interpretation.

Each teams nominee , has one vote per starting position on offense,defense and special teams ie
QB
RB
FB
WR
WR
TE
C
LOT
ROT
LG
RG

NT
DT
LDE
RDE
LOLB
MLB
ROLB
CB
CB
SS
FS

K
P
KR
PR
For a total of 26 votes , each vote has to be for a player in the conference of the team you are nominating for and you can not vote for any players in the team you are nominating for.
Voting will begin after the last game of the regular season.
Hopefully this clears up any ambiguities , feel free to comment if there's anything your not sure about or indeed think can be improved.
I think we should also add a owner catagory as well what do you think?

i don't read to good...are you saying we get one vote for each position, have to vote a a team in our conference, and cannot vote for a player on our team?

Originally posted by drunckenmonkee
i don't read to good...are you saying we get one vote for each position, have to vote a a team in our conference, and cannot vote for a player on our team?

That's what I'm getting out of it--one player per position, has to be in your conference but not on your team.

I also like the idea of voting for an owner. That seems like a good category to add.

I would also suggest that if you have the time and/or inclination, that you add a quick blurb of why you voted for who you voted for (at least on some of your votes). Then pangloss can add in the best comments so we can add a little flavor to the presentation of the results.

i agree...just put some comments after your pick as to why they got your vote.

That sounds cool. Is the probowl roster going to consist of 1 player at each position? No worries either way. Or is it going to be the players with the most 2nd place votes and what not?

How about we nominate one player per position group from our team, but we can't vote on it? A little description of why he should win (or if he should win). This way we have a good group to choose from. And people that came in later in the season have a chance to showcase what they have done with their time. Like if a receiver has 1200 yards + 10 TD in 8 games in the seasons, and another WR has 1500 Yards and 15 TDs in 16 games, who's really the Pro Bowl receiver?

I understand ur point...but I think u should open a separate thread and explain why u think specific players on your team should get our vote and we can all discuss the merits.

Originally posted by drunckenmonkee
I understand ur point...but I think u should open a separate thread and explain why u think specific players on your team should get our vote and we can all discuss the merits.

I'm not talking about my team. Honestly, as much as I love my team and think they did well above what I expected (I expected only 1-2 wins this year to be honest) I don't think any of them deserve PB honors yet. Maybe 1-2 could be up there tops. I'm just saying for some other players (I've seen some other guys up there in stats who didn't play the full season). And I know a lot of the voting is going to go to the guys that have the best overall stats.

hmm...I say start a thread anyways...maybe we all could debate offense and defense pro bowl merits in 2 threads. I know I'd be interested in who people think deserve pro bowl honors. It'll help me in my voting too.

I'll be putting in the vote for the Marcy Projects.

I think we need more than 2 WRs represented even if it leads to a 12-13 man offense. They are a huge part of the offensive game and just looking at the stats there are way more than 2 standout performers at the position.