Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Voltron
Why? Because of some matchup screens you guys posted? Kk, if you want to think you're better because of a matchup screen go ahead. Then we can all laugh at you for it like we did earlier in this thread.

nope dont recall everyone laughing for me earlier in this thread, but nice try?

no but we got higher levels and better depth than you...

I actually just realized today the matchup screen is more about build quality than lvl.

Who is this shitty backup in here trying to say they're better because they think level difference between level 22 starters and 23-24 makes much of a difference.

Originally posted by Snooopaloop
Good rankings. As the owner of salford storm, I like what we have done. We upset 2 top 3 teams, and hope to do the same against algeria.

See you soon algeria!

We are looking forward to it.

Originally posted by Voltron
Who is this shitty backup in here trying to say they're better because they think level difference between level 22 starters and 23-24 makes much of a difference.

shitty? dude I could possibly start on SF! and if not, then the difference between me and him wouldnt be far off. Not every backup is shitty...and yes l-2 levels do matter...thats a difference of 10 sp, which could matter.

EDIT: And plus Voltron, you would know all about shitty backups, now wouldnt you?

Originally posted by bucksboy92
Originally posted by Voltron

Who is this shitty backup in here trying to say they're better because they think level difference between level 22 starters and 23-24 makes much of a difference.

shitty? dude I could possibly start on SF! and if not, then the difference between me and him wouldnt be far off. Not every backup is shitty...and yes l-2 levels do matter...thats a difference of 10 sp, which could matter.

EDIT: And plus Voltron, you would know all about shitty backups, now wouldnt you?

you would not come close to starting. our 2nd string db mihn, has 16 more tackles and the same amoutn of intercep

you know a DB with a high amount of tackles is not necessarily a good thing right?

if i have to explain it to you i'm afraid you're a lost cause.

Originally posted by koldfront
you know a DB with a high amount of tackles is not necessarily a good thing right?

if i have to explain it to you i'm afraid you're a lost cause.

i know that a ss is usally not good with a high amount of tackles due to the pass deflection being better. however, a cbs job is to get the pass deflection, the ss getting a tackle is doing his job. but for the sake of pd's our backup also has 4 times the pass deflections of bucks, 16 more tackles and same interceptions. bucks would be 3rd string on the goldrush. also, if anyone makes the point that psk has a better d and so as a backup he dosent get as much playing time as the starter therefore he cant do have great stats. the san fran defense is better, have only been scored on with 58 points, whereas psk has been scored on with 75 points, consider also, that we play in a harder conference.

*sigh* ok...then with that many PDs and tackles...your linebackers suck ass like it's a cosmo on queer night.

have you ever considered where just a good team kold haha?

nope...yer queer. (see?!?!?! i didn't call you GAY!)

does that mean i am cooler than angela?

Originally posted by koldfront
nope...yer queer. (see?!?!?! i didn't call you GAY!)

does that mean i am cooler than angela?

yeah, but not exactly a hard thing to accomplish

sweet!
i are one step up from ape.

angela are one step down from monkey.

Originally posted by bucksboy92
Originally posted by Voltron

Who is this shitty backup in here trying to say they're better because they think level difference between level 22 starters and 23-24 makes much of a difference.

shitty? dude I could possibly start on SF! and if not, then the difference between me and him wouldnt be far off. Not every backup is shitty...and yes l-2 levels do matter...thats a difference of 10 sp, which could matter.

EDIT: And plus Voltron, you would know all about shitty backups, now wouldnt you?

10 SP don't mean much when it costs 3 points to raise shit. Yes I know all about shitty backups, I talk to you on the forums all the time.

So what EXACTLY is being compared when the "which team is better" arguments arise? San Fran players just argue about how great their "builds" are and such. Maybe you guys do have good builds. My question is, how the fuck do you know what the builds look like for the rest of the teams? Its like you guys have some "secret access" to every team in the league.