Did you really just put a nobody like Muhammed in with Hines ward and Larry Fitzgerald? Those are 3 different types of wr. Well two different types as Muhammed is a poor man's Fitzgerald. Hines ward is a hard nose receiver that blocked well. So before you try to do a generalization of what I'm saying do research. I am saying no wr should be blocking like a lineman. Dbs would run right by then.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by jakedood
Yeah thats one thin I agree on, WR's should have it really really really expensive to build blocking skills past 30, so cost should rise steeply, dont want WR's with 70/80 RBT
What? WRs already have insanely high blocking skills. There is no reason to raise them. I think they should actually lower them.
Yeah thats one thin I agree on, WR's should have it really really really expensive to build blocking skills past 30, so cost should rise steeply, dont want WR's with 70/80 RBT
What? WRs already have insanely high blocking skills. There is no reason to raise them. I think they should actually lower them.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by vipermaw82
Did you really just put a nobody like Muhammed in with Hines ward and Larry Fitzgerald? Those are 3 different types of wr. Well two different types as Muhammed is a poor man's Fitzgerald. Hines ward is a hard nose receiver that blocked well. So before you try to do a generalization of what I'm saying do research. I am saying no wr should be blocking like a lineman. Dbs would run right by then.
Give me a break. To say no WRs can block is insulting to all those blocking WRs out there.
Did you really just put a nobody like Muhammed in with Hines ward and Larry Fitzgerald? Those are 3 different types of wr. Well two different types as Muhammed is a poor man's Fitzgerald. Hines ward is a hard nose receiver that blocked well. So before you try to do a generalization of what I'm saying do research. I am saying no wr should be blocking like a lineman. Dbs would run right by then.
Give me a break. To say no WRs can block is insulting to all those blocking WRs out there.
MC_Hammer
offline
offline
Originally posted by vipermaw82
Did you really just put a nobody like Muhammed in with Hines ward and Larry Fitzgerald? Those are 3 different types of wr. Well two different types as Muhammed is a poor man's Fitzgerald. Hines ward is a hard nose receiver that blocked well. So before you try to do a generalization of what I'm saying do research. I am saying no wr should be blocking like a lineman. Dbs would run right by then.
As a blocker? Abso-fucking-lutely. (edit: likely due to his playing HB and LB before college... he likes hitting people)
Not saying he is a great pass catcher though. (edit: though he was good enough to make the Pro Bowl twice)
Did you really just put a nobody like Muhammed in with Hines ward and Larry Fitzgerald? Those are 3 different types of wr. Well two different types as Muhammed is a poor man's Fitzgerald. Hines ward is a hard nose receiver that blocked well. So before you try to do a generalization of what I'm saying do research. I am saying no wr should be blocking like a lineman. Dbs would run right by then.
As a blocker? Abso-fucking-lutely. (edit: likely due to his playing HB and LB before college... he likes hitting people)
Not saying he is a great pass catcher though. (edit: though he was good enough to make the Pro Bowl twice)
Edited by MC_Hammer on Jul 22, 2016 15:03:42
jakedood
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
What? WRs already have insanely high blocking skills. There is no reason to raise them. I think they should actually lower them.
Yeah that's what I was saying... so once the SP cost gets really really high for each point, fast once you pass a certain stage, so it costs a 1000SP for a point at 35, and like 3500 past 50
What? WRs already have insanely high blocking skills. There is no reason to raise them. I think they should actually lower them.
Yeah that's what I was saying... so once the SP cost gets really really high for each point, fast once you pass a certain stage, so it costs a 1000SP for a point at 35, and like 3500 past 50
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
I meant they already have a high SP cost for blocking. The SP cost for blocking on WRs should be lower.
jakedood
offline
offline
Definitely not, I mean teams can already dominate with 2 rushers and the rest of the team blocking. It'd be nicer to have variety and style matchups than one specific game plan that wins
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
If they nerfed blocking on WRs, good luck having a balanced team run outside at all due to the WRs absolutely sucking at holding a block.
NWWarrior
offline
offline
Interesting thread, I remember these type of conversations back in the original GLB seasons 1-4.
vipermaw82
offline
offline
Lol I have given up on this season the early losses just added up and I lost interest. But no reset
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by vipermaw82
Didn't help I've had zero time to gp going on 2 weeks either
Just make sure you game plan against Blue Ridge.
Didn't help I've had zero time to gp going on 2 weeks either
Just make sure you game plan against Blue Ridge.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
