You guys do realize that this is an automated scheduler right? It's never going to be perfect and some team is always going to get the short end of the stick per say. I don't know exactly what order the selections are made, but each time a game is scheduled in a tier the selections get smaller and smaller.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Ladder
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Because that's what people said they wanted.
who said they wanted repeat opponents late season? I don't recall ANYONE saying that
Originally posted by TxSteve
every single person would say the ladder is improved
improved how exactly, and from when... last season?
Because that's what people said they wanted.
who said they wanted repeat opponents late season? I don't recall ANYONE saying that
Originally posted by TxSteve
every single person would say the ladder is improved
improved how exactly, and from when... last season?
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 18:23:29
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 18:18:43
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
who said they wanted repeat opponents late season? I don't recall ANYONE saying that
A lot of people would rather face a similar-ranked opponent than an opponent they haven't faced either 20 ranks up or 20 ranks down.
who said they wanted repeat opponents late season? I don't recall ANYONE saying that
A lot of people would rather face a similar-ranked opponent than an opponent they haven't faced either 20 ranks up or 20 ranks down.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
A lot of people would rather face a similar-ranked opponent than an opponent they haven't faced either 20 ranks up or 20 ranks down.
there are teams within 5 spots of other teams that never played head to head this season. For example, both Columbus and Kentucky are within only 4 spots of Madison and we didn't play either this season... instead we're playing our second straight ladder game against a team we already faced in ladder this season, and Kentucky just replayed a CPU they already faced in ladder, and Columbus is playing All-American for the 2nd time
There is absolutely no reason two teams should play a ladder team a 2nd time the same day when they haven't played each other and are within only a few ladder spots
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
A lot of people would rather face a similar-ranked opponent than an opponent they haven't faced either 20 ranks up or 20 ranks down.
there are teams within 5 spots of other teams that never played head to head this season. For example, both Columbus and Kentucky are within only 4 spots of Madison and we didn't play either this season... instead we're playing our second straight ladder game against a team we already faced in ladder this season, and Kentucky just replayed a CPU they already faced in ladder, and Columbus is playing All-American for the 2nd time
There is absolutely no reason two teams should play a ladder team a 2nd time the same day when they haven't played each other and are within only a few ladder spots
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 20:18:37
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 20:16:18
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 20:15:27
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 20:15:11
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Oct 14, 2015 20:13:19
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
there are teams within 5 spots of other teams that never played head to head this season. For example, both Columbus and Kentucky are within only 4 spots of Madison and we didn't play either this season... instead we're playing our second straight ladder game against a team we already faced in ladder this season, and Kentucky just replayed a CPU they already faced in ladder, and Columbus is playing All-American for the 2nd time
There is absolutely no reason two teams should play a ladder team a 2nd time the same day when they haven't played each other and are within only a few ladder spots
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
You are wrong.
there are teams within 5 spots of other teams that never played head to head this season. For example, both Columbus and Kentucky are within only 4 spots of Madison and we didn't play either this season... instead we're playing our second straight ladder game against a team we already faced in ladder this season, and Kentucky just replayed a CPU they already faced in ladder, and Columbus is playing All-American for the 2nd time
There is absolutely no reason two teams should play a ladder team a 2nd time the same day when they haven't played each other and are within only a few ladder spots
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
You are wrong.
dredgar
offline
offline
It is much improved over last season. There are still flaws in it yes. But overall the ladder was much better this year.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
That is because you only play Vet.
dunno where TXSteve is pulling his poll results, but ladder matchup logic has DEFINITELY NOT improved
That is because you only play Vet.
don't listen to diddy -- he's grasping at straws for why he's dropping out of the top 10....so it must be the ladder matchups fault.
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Because that's what people said they wanted.
To be fair, a few people have already supported it itt.
Because that's what people said they wanted.
To be fair, a few people have already supported it itt.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Because that's what people said they wanted.
2 things:
I love the new ladder
I cant remember that anyone screamed for repeat matchups
Because that's what people said they wanted.
2 things:
I love the new ladder
I cant remember that anyone screamed for repeat matchups
dredgar
offline
offline
no they just wanted 1vs2 3vs4 or 1vs4. Basically saying they wanted very close match ups at seasons end. and for the most part they have been that way. it did end with a few repeats. There also still a few that got way easy match ups too.
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
2 things:
I love the new ladder
I cant remember that anyone screamed for repeat matchups
People asked that at the end of the season that we have higher ranked teams play each other. The only way to do this is to relax the "already played" check which results in multiple teams replaying teams. So, they may not have said directly that they wanted repeat match-ups but indirectly they did.
2 things:
I love the new ladder
I cant remember that anyone screamed for repeat matchups
People asked that at the end of the season that we have higher ranked teams play each other. The only way to do this is to relax the "already played" check which results in multiple teams replaying teams. So, they may not have said directly that they wanted repeat match-ups but indirectly they did.
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Basically, good job on the ladder bortdog. Clearly bigger issues to address at this point, so spend your time elsewhere.
FairForever
offline
offline
Huge loss by Erkner today. Opens the door for AK to take #1 in the Pro tier with a win over Missingno today.
Vet: Bronx has a date against DD. LogZilla has one against MEM. Very clear that if Bronx wins, they're #1. Would Bronx stay #1 with a loss combined with a Xars win? Who knows... would prefer not to find out
Pro: Discussed above
J-Man: No Name holds #1 and can lock it down with a win over Salty. Virgins probably need a win over the Sperm Whales (inactive) combined with a No Name loss to jump to #1 in the tier.
Seasoned: GoZ appears to have locked #1 with a win today.
Sophomore: SACKS is 24 spots ahead of Portland Storm heading into today's game... it's a lock no matter how today's games play out.
Rookie: Most exciting one. DD 4.0 vs Hall of Fame - tied at #1. Winner gets the top prize.
Vet: Bronx has a date against DD. LogZilla has one against MEM. Very clear that if Bronx wins, they're #1. Would Bronx stay #1 with a loss combined with a Xars win? Who knows... would prefer not to find out
Pro: Discussed above
J-Man: No Name holds #1 and can lock it down with a win over Salty. Virgins probably need a win over the Sperm Whales (inactive) combined with a No Name loss to jump to #1 in the tier.
Seasoned: GoZ appears to have locked #1 with a win today.
Sophomore: SACKS is 24 spots ahead of Portland Storm heading into today's game... it's a lock no matter how today's games play out.
Rookie: Most exciting one. DD 4.0 vs Hall of Fame - tied at #1. Winner gets the top prize.
dredgar
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
J-Man: No Name holds #1 and can lock it down with a win over Salty. Virgins probably need a win over the Sperm Whales (inactive) combined with a No Name loss to jump to #1 in the tier.
any chance with a double loss and win by bloody over pron they jump both?
J-Man: No Name holds #1 and can lock it down with a win over Salty. Virgins probably need a win over the Sperm Whales (inactive) combined with a No Name loss to jump to #1 in the tier.
any chance with a double loss and win by bloody over pron they jump both?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
