I stand corrected after looking into it, however the standings are correct and a and m is the division winner.
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by HayRow
I think in a 3 way tie the h2h is thrown out. Not positive, but i think so. VS might be on the outside looking in due to points allowed
This
And Again it depends in which order tie breaks are computed.
However....
Assuming Alpine wins the Division (3 Way Tie on Points Allowed)
Next Tie Breaker is VS vs Texas A&M
[ALSO I am 100% sure now that the way they are listed is not a guarantee of how they will be listed at rollover) The order of list includes division record but not the playoff tiebreakers and certainly not in a head to head.
Also tie breaker after H2H (Not included in 3-Way) then Points Allowed.... then Points for
I think in a 3 way tie the h2h is thrown out. Not positive, but i think so. VS might be on the outside looking in due to points allowed
This
And Again it depends in which order tie breaks are computed.
However....
Assuming Alpine wins the Division (3 Way Tie on Points Allowed)
Next Tie Breaker is VS vs Texas A&M
[ALSO I am 100% sure now that the way they are listed is not a guarantee of how they will be listed at rollover) The order of list includes division record but not the playoff tiebreakers and certainly not in a head to head.
Also tie breaker after H2H (Not included in 3-Way) then Points Allowed.... then Points for
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
I stand corrected after looking into it, however the standings are correct and a and m is the division winner.
I'm 100% sure the standings immediately after sim are not 100% correct they are not re-run until rollover for tiebreaker purposes ... unless its been fixed since season #4.
I stand corrected after looking into it, however the standings are correct and a and m is the division winner.
I'm 100% sure the standings immediately after sim are not 100% correct they are not re-run until rollover for tiebreaker purposes ... unless its been fixed since season #4.
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by william78
I'm 100% sure the standings immediately after sim are not 100% correct they are not re-run until rollover for tiebreaker purposes ... unless its been fixed since season #4.
We had this happen to drz last season remeber? Drz was tied with dc but the standings had us on top despite the 1-1 hth
I'm 100% sure the standings immediately after sim are not 100% correct they are not re-run until rollover for tiebreaker purposes ... unless its been fixed since season #4.
We had this happen to drz last season remeber? Drz was tied with dc but the standings had us on top despite the 1-1 hth
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
We had this happen to drz last season remeber? Drz was tied with dc but the standings had us on top despite the 1-1 hth
I'm not sure who the Drunken Zombie was tied with and how it was resolved but....
That said, I know I've seen the division winner "corrected" at rollover on the last day of the season.
As a matter of fact; its happened in Madison before http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5173474?page=1 division winner is not decalred until rollover. My suspicion is it will treat it as a 3-way tie / 3-way tie and use points allowed based on previous playoff teams and Bort postings (IE removing all H2H comparisons) however http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5177293?page=6#48437279. There was alot of suggestions so we'll see if we have something going.
We had this happen to drz last season remeber? Drz was tied with dc but the standings had us on top despite the 1-1 hth
I'm not sure who the Drunken Zombie was tied with and how it was resolved but....
That said, I know I've seen the division winner "corrected" at rollover on the last day of the season.
As a matter of fact; its happened in Madison before http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5173474?page=1 division winner is not decalred until rollover. My suspicion is it will treat it as a 3-way tie / 3-way tie and use points allowed based on previous playoff teams and Bort postings (IE removing all H2H comparisons) however http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5177293?page=6#48437279. There was alot of suggestions so we'll see if we have something going.
Edited by william78 on Oct 6, 2014 14:17:58
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by william78
I'm not sure who the Drunken Zombie was tied with and how it was resolved but....
That said, I know I've seen the division winner "corrected" at rollover on the last day of the season.
As a matter of fact; its happened in Madison before http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5173474?page=1 division winner is not decalred until rollover. My suspicion is it will treat it as a 3-way tie / 3-way tie and use points allowed based on previous playoff teams and Bort postings (IE removing all H2H comparisons) however http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5177293?page=6#48437279. There was alot of suggestions so we'll see if we have something going.
Just to expound; as I read Corndog's post I read it as:
Simultaneous Action
Operation A&B)
Operation A: All Division Winners are decided
Operation B: The Wild Card Order is decided (Order of Record, with HTH and multi-way ties resolved) Wild Card has the 3 division winners subtracted, if the script runs this way it would spit out:
1.Stark Dire Wolves 12-2
2.Alpine Affinerus 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
3.Texas A&M 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
4.Victorious Secret 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
5. Daharan Empire 9-5
6. Rhode Island Falcons 8-4
7. Tortuga Pirates 7-7 (H2H Shangri-la)
8. Shangri-la Dragons 7-7 (H2H Tortuga)
9. Factory of Sadness 6-8
10. Shell City Shockers 4-10
11. Tulsa Sharks 1-13
12. San Jose Sentinells 0-14
... It would then run a lookup function and call the 3 division winner names from the list; and run a strike or eliminate command , removing Stark, Alpine, and Empire from the list. The highest remaining team is Texas A&M on the list who becomes the wild card.
It then seeds the Wild Card as the #4 with Division Winners ordered according to the above list 1-3.
I'm not sure who the Drunken Zombie was tied with and how it was resolved but....
That said, I know I've seen the division winner "corrected" at rollover on the last day of the season.
As a matter of fact; its happened in Madison before http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5173474?page=1 division winner is not decalred until rollover. My suspicion is it will treat it as a 3-way tie / 3-way tie and use points allowed based on previous playoff teams and Bort postings (IE removing all H2H comparisons) however http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5177293?page=6#48437279. There was alot of suggestions so we'll see if we have something going.
Just to expound; as I read Corndog's post I read it as:
Simultaneous Action
Operation A&B)Operation A: All Division Winners are decided
Operation B: The Wild Card Order is decided (Order of Record, with HTH and multi-way ties resolved) Wild Card has the 3 division winners subtracted, if the script runs this way it would spit out:
1.Stark Dire Wolves 12-2
2.Alpine Affinerus 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
3.Texas A&M 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
4.Victorious Secret 10-4 (Multi-Way PA)
5. Daharan Empire 9-5
6. Rhode Island Falcons 8-4
7. Tortuga Pirates 7-7 (H2H Shangri-la)
8. Shangri-la Dragons 7-7 (H2H Tortuga)
9. Factory of Sadness 6-8
10. Shell City Shockers 4-10
11. Tulsa Sharks 1-13
12. San Jose Sentinells 0-14
... It would then run a lookup function and call the 3 division winner names from the list; and run a strike or eliminate command , removing Stark, Alpine, and Empire from the list. The highest remaining team is Texas A&M on the list who becomes the wild card.
It then seeds the Wild Card as the #4 with Division Winners ordered according to the above list 1-3.
Alpine deserved to be outside of the playoffs when I have been away for weeks. So can't blame anyone but ourselves (or me! hehe)
So sorry to the Alpine guys from myself.
So sorry to the Alpine guys from myself.
HayRow
offline
offline
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
lolrngvictory
Majestic Gent
offline
offline
Originally posted by HayRow
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrOH-KHxXg0
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrOH-KHxXg0
HayRow
offline
offline
Originally posted by Majestic Gent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrOH-KHxXg0
lolno...we got rng raped
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrOH-KHxXg0
lolno...we got rng raped
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by HayRow
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0URyxkeSZM
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0URyxkeSZM
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by HayRow
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
those defenders were falling over like there was someone in the stands with a .22
won't even get a gg outta me for that TRASH RNG victory. 4 fumbles, 3 lost, http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/112054/2874137 this TD vs the perfect call...
lolrngvictory
those defenders were falling over like there was someone in the stands with a .22
HayRow
offline
offline
Originally posted by mrm708
those defenders were falling over like there was someone in the stands with a .22
Originally posted by Majestic Gent
lol you guys are just rubbing it in now.
it's the truth
those defenders were falling over like there was someone in the stands with a .22
Originally posted by Majestic Gent
lol you guys are just rubbing it in now.
it's the truth
Originally posted by HayRow
it's the truth
I'll tell you one thing -- I'm impressed with your commitment to the pass...but I sure don't understand it!
Season stats:
42.3% Completion
141 completions
8 TD
3 INT
80 hurries
53 sacks
it's the truth
I'll tell you one thing -- I'm impressed with your commitment to the pass...but I sure don't understand it!
Season stats:
42.3% Completion
141 completions
8 TD
3 INT
80 hurries
53 sacks
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























