I feel your pain...
my #3 HoF QB (in rookie) last season can't find a soph team
my #3 HoF QB (in rookie) last season can't find a soph team
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > So what happened
o The Boss x
offline
offline
Nothing too new from GLB1. Create your players with a team you know will be together for a while, or you're screwed.
Originally posted by o The Boss x
Nothing too new from GLB1. Create your players with a team you know will be together for a while, or you're screwed.
you mean build good players or you are screwed.
Nothing too new from GLB1. Create your players with a team you know will be together for a while, or you're screwed.
you mean build good players or you are screwed.
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
I feel your pain...
my #3 HoF QB (in rookie) last season can't find a soph team
dude your QB is awfully average, i saw the build
just because hes #3 in the HOF doesn't mean he will fit somewhere else, nor do ppl want to leave what they have for something that was in an abusive system just for your joe.
I feel your pain...
my #3 HoF QB (in rookie) last season can't find a soph team
dude your QB is awfully average, i saw the build
just because hes #3 in the HOF doesn't mean he will fit somewhere else, nor do ppl want to leave what they have for something that was in an abusive system just for your joe.
Dragon fly
offline
offline
But still no matter if players are average they should be able to find some teams to play in. This is kinda stupid.
Edited by Dragon fly on May 13, 2014 14:51:15
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dragon fly
But still no matter if players are average they should be able to find some teams to play in. This is kinda stupid.
There are CPU teams available. Balancing the number of human owned teams with the number of players available is something that would be pretty much impossible to micromanage constantly.
But still no matter if players are average they should be able to find some teams to play in. This is kinda stupid.
There are CPU teams available. Balancing the number of human owned teams with the number of players available is something that would be pretty much impossible to micromanage constantly.
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by o The Boss x
The second I see slow built on a S* I stop looking at it.
But nothing is more important than having every single cap at an insanely huge number, despite the fact that you won't get to most of them!
The second I see slow built on a S* I stop looking at it.
But nothing is more important than having every single cap at an insanely huge number, despite the fact that you won't get to most of them!
bhall43
offline
offline
What is to say they aren't trying to manipulate getting 100 in 3 caps that they couldn't otherwise?
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
There are CPU teams available. Balancing the number of human owned teams with the number of players available is something that would be pretty much impossible to micromanage constantly.
What they should do is make it so that if a CPU team accumulates 36 human players it becomes available for purchase by anyone who doesn't own more than one team. If a team ever drops below 36 human players the team becomes CPU owned until it moves to 36 or above again.
New rookie owners get an offseason grace period to put together a roster before going CPU.
There are CPU teams available. Balancing the number of human owned teams with the number of players available is something that would be pretty much impossible to micromanage constantly.
What they should do is make it so that if a CPU team accumulates 36 human players it becomes available for purchase by anyone who doesn't own more than one team. If a team ever drops below 36 human players the team becomes CPU owned until it moves to 36 or above again.
New rookie owners get an offseason grace period to put together a roster before going CPU.
bhall43
offline
offline
That way you don't entirely feel like "fuck I am signing my player to a CPU team". It is more like "hopefully this team fills up with needy FA's and someone can take control of it".
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
What they should do is make it so that if a CPU team accumulates 36 human players it becomes available for purchase by anyone who doesn't own more than one team. If a team ever drops below 36 human players the team becomes CPU owned until it moves to 36 or above again.
New rookie owners get an offseason grace period to put together a roster before going CPU.
eh, I wouldn't do it, but I could see someone wanting to run a team full of CPUs. No need to punish that owner that simply is anti-social and too cheap to build all the players.
What they should do is make it so that if a CPU team accumulates 36 human players it becomes available for purchase by anyone who doesn't own more than one team. If a team ever drops below 36 human players the team becomes CPU owned until it moves to 36 or above again.
New rookie owners get an offseason grace period to put together a roster before going CPU.
eh, I wouldn't do it, but I could see someone wanting to run a team full of CPUs. No need to punish that owner that simply is anti-social and too cheap to build all the players.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
eh, I wouldn't do it, but I could see someone wanting to run a team full of CPUs. No need to punish that owner that simply is anti-social and too cheap to build all the players.
I think that is entirely what we are trying to avoid here hence the reason people aren't just able to buy tons of teams.
eh, I wouldn't do it, but I could see someone wanting to run a team full of CPUs. No need to punish that owner that simply is anti-social and too cheap to build all the players.
I think that is entirely what we are trying to avoid here hence the reason people aren't just able to buy tons of teams.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
