Warrior General Games

for what it's worth I have the two best sacking LBs in the game right now, and I think Trash Talk is amazing

Originally posted by Galithor
Once per game or so isn't terribly impressive. I'd have expected "up to 30%" chance to fire with 75 intimidation to be considerably more effective.

If taking it to 3 stars only gets you 2-3 per game, I'm not sure that's such a big deal... even if you had it on the whole linebacker corps and SS's. It's still a bunch of morale loss for the QB, but maybe not so devastating with even modest toughness investment.

Last season when he was blitzing 50% of plays I was seeing it more like 5-6 times a game. Placing it on all of your blitzing LBs could see it firing every 2nd or 3rd play (depending on your offense). Toughness may be way more important for QBs than anyone realises though it would take some proper analysis of the effect of morale on production; note this could actually be done now with the nice new API though that may not contain energy and morale information.

Originally posted by Sardonik00
Who wants to know more about Xavori?

http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/6.05/ultima_pr.html



I think I played Ultima in 1989.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
for what it's worth I have the two best sacking LBs in the game right now, and I think Trash Talk is amazing

you have LBs with a lot sacks, not the best. don't get it twisted lol.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
for what it's worth I have the two best sacking LBs in the game right now, and I think Trash Talk is amazing

fucking LOL

srsly dude... you're in Soph. Stop making stupid fucking claims like this... it's not true.

Originally posted by Homage
fucking LOL

srsly dude... you're in Soph. Stop making stupid fucking claims like this... it's not true.

Hey, it takes work to get just under half of your sack total against CPU/inactive teams.

Originally posted by pottsman
Hey, it takes work to get just under half of your sack total against CPU/inactive teams.

haven't played an inactive team all season (Zorp was right at beg of season when he was active), and only one CPU team thus far

schedule hasn't been exactly a cakewalk... 9-0, but 5-0 against 4 teams in the soph top 8 and a full-human seasoned team with a much higher rating.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
haven't played an inactive team all season (Zorp was right at beg of season when he was active), and only one CPU team thus far

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/456 owner hasn't logged in since March 24th, you played them on the 30th, when your LBs got 13 and 10 sacks.

Originally posted by pottsman
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/456 owner hasn't logged in since March 24th, you played them on the 30th, when your LBs got 13 and 10 sacks.

He wouldn't have gotten the inactive tag until the 31st right?

Originally posted by Galithor
He wouldn't have gotten the inactive tag until the 31st right?

exactly, and it's not like Zorp doesn't have like 6 other OCs/DCs/GMs that modify depth charts/playbooks/etc stuff

and why are YOU even saying anything Pottsman, red hand is in maybe the WORST sophomore league... you should be plowing through everyone and racking up crazy numbers

if you look at the league teams in ladder, the one my bulldogs are in (Mars) is probably the 2nd toughest Soph league after Oberan

Originally posted by TDiddy8701


and why are YOU even saying anything Pottsman, red hand is in maybe the WORST sophomore league... you should be plowing through everyone and racking up crazy numbers

if you look at the league teams in ladder, the one my bulldogs are in (Mars) is probably the 2nd toughest Soph league after Oberan

Actually, Pottsman's league has the same average ranking as Mars. Together they're among a handful of leagues in the 180-190 average rank range.

Then you've got Oberon, which is all the way down at average rank 148.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
for what it's worth I have the two best sacking LBs in the game right now, and I think Trash Talk is amazing

I hear your team also has the owner with the biggest head.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
exactly, and it's not like Zorp doesn't have like 6 other OCs/DCs/GMs that modify depth charts/playbooks/etc stuff

Once an owner goes inactive the team changes to auto-pilot. It doesn't matter what OCs/DCs/GMs do, the team is treated like a CPU team.

It doesn't change the point of the argument, though. Until the owner gets the Inactive tag, whatever is set in the calendar or as default is used.

fair enough... technically the team wasn't "inactive" status when they played us, so everything could have been modified as I'm sure the OC/DC handled anyway

Originally posted by killershrew
I hear your team also has the owner with the biggest head.

that award goes to Xavori and Jampy, the "self-proclaimed gods" of GLB

never said my TEAM was amazing, just said we are great specifically at blitzing, that's it... in fact it's probably a hindrance, as teams tend to run very well against us. We get more sacks against teams that play us (see - hookers, zorp, pelicans, as well as our league teams) than pretty much anyone they will play all season.