Since K and P are positions, why don't you just make KR/PR a position and be done with all the confusion?
Forum > Suggestions > Cornerbacks Should Have Carrying Grip
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Since K and P are positions, why don't you just make KR/PR a position and be done with all the confusion?
People would still make wr, hb, and fb as their returners. Why waste the roster spot on some as insignificant as that?
Since K and P are positions, why don't you just make KR/PR a position and be done with all the confusion?
People would still make wr, hb, and fb as their returners. Why waste the roster spot on some as insignificant as that?
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Is a P wasting a roster spot?
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
-Phaytle-
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Is a P wasting a roster spot?
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
A P can't play another position.
Is a P wasting a roster spot?
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
A P can't play another position.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Is a P wasting a roster spot?
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Is a P wasting a roster spot?
Sure, if a KR/PR player cost a lot of flex and a lot of salary cap space, it would be a waste, but that isn't exactly the suggestion.
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
It just makes absolutely terrible sense to go through and give CB's all the return abilities when they clearly aren't going to be anywhere near as good as a returner from HB, WR, or FB. The only reason it made any logical sense in GLB1 was that CB's were given the SA in their tree and they were cheaper than both HB and WR. Now? Nonsense.
Lol what? So they have this tree so they are automatically considered return men. You are given a trait of return man for the CB and nooo they can't be good return men! Make more sense than that. Also, how do you know for a fact that they wouldn't be good? Was it tested giving them all the same ability as a HB or WR? If not, don't blast lying bullshit in here and post facts why they wouldn't be good return men.
It just makes absolutely terrible sense to go through and give CB's all the return abilities when they clearly aren't going to be anywhere near as good as a returner from HB, WR, or FB. The only reason it made any logical sense in GLB1 was that CB's were given the SA in their tree and they were cheaper than both HB and WR. Now? Nonsense.
Lol what? So they have this tree so they are automatically considered return men. You are given a trait of return man for the CB and nooo they can't be good return men! Make more sense than that. Also, how do you know for a fact that they wouldn't be good? Was it tested giving them all the same ability as a HB or WR? If not, don't blast lying bullshit in here and post facts why they wouldn't be good return men.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Although I suppose it might be worth making a rookie only team without a K or P since Kickers suck and the extra two players would help field position....
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Although I suppose it might be worth making a rookie only team without a K or P since Kickers suck and the extra two players would help field position....
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Therefore, if KR/PR was the only one with return skills, it would not be a waste. Congratulations Einstein.
A punter is the only one who has punting skills so...no it's not a waste.
Therefore, if KR/PR was the only one with return skills, it would not be a waste. Congratulations Einstein.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
Lol what? So they have this tree so they are automatically considered return men. You are given a trait of return man for the CB and nooo they can't be good return men! Make more sense than that. Also, how do you know for a fact that they wouldn't be good? Was it tested giving them all the same ability as a HB or WR? If not, don't blast lying bullshit in here and post facts why they wouldn't be good return men.
You seem seriously lost...when you want to tell me to make more sense at least make sense yourself. If you are making sense of anything you aren't asking stupid questions like you are..yes I retardedly read your answer...
Lol what? So they have this tree so they are automatically considered return men. You are given a trait of return man for the CB and nooo they can't be good return men! Make more sense than that. Also, how do you know for a fact that they wouldn't be good? Was it tested giving them all the same ability as a HB or WR? If not, don't blast lying bullshit in here and post facts why they wouldn't be good return men.
You seem seriously lost...when you want to tell me to make more sense at least make sense yourself. If you are making sense of anything you aren't asking stupid questions like you are..yes I retardedly read your answer...
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Adderfist
Although I suppose it might be worth making a rookie only team without a K or P since Kickers suck and the extra two players would help field position....
No it wouldnt. But you can try it all you want as long as im not involved.
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Therefore, if KR/PR was the only one with return skills, it would not be a waste. Congratulations Einstein.
you keep stangling yourself without relevant details....and i just keeeeep hoping at some point you look at things and say hey??!??! I get it now!!!
What do returners get currently that other players dont?
Answer me that and then i will fill you in on all the greatest secrets in the game.
Although I suppose it might be worth making a rookie only team without a K or P since Kickers suck and the extra two players would help field position....
No it wouldnt. But you can try it all you want as long as im not involved.
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Therefore, if KR/PR was the only one with return skills, it would not be a waste. Congratulations Einstein.
you keep stangling yourself without relevant details....and i just keeeeep hoping at some point you look at things and say hey??!??! I get it now!!!
What do returners get currently that other players dont?
Answer me that and then i will fill you in on all the greatest secrets in the game.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
You seem seriously lost...when you want to tell me to make more sense at least make sense yourself. If you are making sense of anything you aren't asking stupid questions like you are..yes I retardedly read your answer...
No, in fact you are the one that is lost. You have yet to give me facts that I have asked for to prove why they are better return men. What makes them better? A CB is basically the WR of the Defense is he not? So why is he so inferior to a WR?
You seem seriously lost...when you want to tell me to make more sense at least make sense yourself. If you are making sense of anything you aren't asking stupid questions like you are..yes I retardedly read your answer...
No, in fact you are the one that is lost. You have yet to give me facts that I have asked for to prove why they are better return men. What makes them better? A CB is basically the WR of the Defense is he not? So why is he so inferior to a WR?
Edited by Reaper Of The Dead on Mar 27, 2014 23:30:16
Edited by Reaper Of The Dead on Mar 27, 2014 23:29:52
Edited by Reaper Of The Dead on Mar 27, 2014 23:25:08
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
No, in fact you are the one that is lost. You have yet to give me facts that I have asked for to prove why they are better return men. What makes them better? A CB is basically the WR of the Defense is he not? So why is he so inferior to a WR?
Carrying Awareness/Elusive Running/Power Running/Carrying Grip...The CB has none of these.
No, in fact you are the one that is lost. You have yet to give me facts that I have asked for to prove why they are better return men. What makes them better? A CB is basically the WR of the Defense is he not? So why is he so inferior to a WR?
Carrying Awareness/Elusive Running/Power Running/Carrying Grip...The CB has none of these.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
Carrying Awareness/Elusive Running/Power Running/Carrying Grip...The CB has none of these.
Yes, I know that. But, why can't they? I want to have a real exact reason why they can't have these things. Not some, they are a CB they can't be a Return Man. Because that is bullshit.
Carrying Awareness/Elusive Running/Power Running/Carrying Grip...The CB has none of these.
Yes, I know that. But, why can't they? I want to have a real exact reason why they can't have these things. Not some, they are a CB they can't be a Return Man. Because that is bullshit.
I don't know...it is definitely confusing. In GLB1 it was preferred in the early seasons and CBs are still winning STMvPs today. Here they even allow you to select the "Return Specialist" trait for CBs, with the desc. reading "Half of a third of the game". They're referring to STs obviously.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/37781 - Built him without looking into it
I'm gonna convert this abortion to a INT CB hopefully...GG
Also why is it that you're not allowed to put a TE at WR but you can put a CB at KR/PR when it is admittedly not wanted by the devs?
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/37781 - Built him without looking into it
I'm gonna convert this abortion to a INT CB hopefully...GG Also why is it that you're not allowed to put a TE at WR but you can put a CB at KR/PR when it is admittedly not wanted by the devs?
Edited by DeeVee8 on Mar 27, 2014 23:41:52
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
