User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > HOF needs to be more accomidating to all positions
Page:
 
Laggo
offline
Link
 
I dont see a problem with adjusting that way, its just obviously adjusted too high. You shouldn't need to triple the stats of the tier above to pass them.

And lol at all my stats being against sub-100 rookies when we are playing Soph every ladder now and Sunday Funday has the same experience as Zorp in their league play.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Asheme

i just don't see how that's the case. if rookies and sophs are on equal footing, then i'm curious about my backup lb on zorp.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/38996

69 sacks, 18 hurries, 21 tackles, 5 tfl, 13 ffum, 1 safety on 27 plays per game. he's 101st on the defensive hof list.

this lb: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/6996

39 sacks, 50 hurries, 37 tackles, 9 tfl, 8 ffum on 44 players per game. he's 11th on the defensive hof list.

i see no demonstrative difference between their numbers for the season that would put one 90 spots behind the other. clearly the answer lies elsewhere.


Since it is the HOF, it probably takes their career stats, not just season stats. That sophomore guy has 96 career sacks.
 
Asheme
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nortobc
Since it is the HOF, it probably takes their career stats, not just season stats. That sophomore guy has 96 career sacks.

it doesn't, though. it's broken up into seasons, without any influence from past data.

i mean, if it's global rank, then it's global rank. whatever. can we at least get the tier hof to display on the player's bio page instead of the overall hof that's heavily weighted against them?
 
bdnannac
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Asheme
what if the rookie dominates great competition relative to their tier?

Yeah I agree then. They should be able to be ranked up there. For some reason I was only thinking about them blowing out other rookies. I have a SS receiver playing on my Soph team and he's doing pretty well. If he dominated then I would want him up in the ranks.
Edited by bdnannac on Mar 7, 2014 13:07:18
 
jamz
offline
Link
 
HOF needs to be a HOF.
 
NiborRis
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jamz
HOF needs to be a HOF.


So it should be based on how many forum posts include a reference to the dot?
 
Laggo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jamz
HOF needs to be a HOF.


I also said you should rename that list to Allstars and make a real HoF where you only rank retired players and don't count stats from the "retired league" or w/e

People can reitre early to be #1 on the list for a while but as the season 1 and 2 dots hit retirement the cream will rise to the top.
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
yawn
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Laggo your day in the sun will come... and it'll come pretty soon.

Ringin' won't be able to keep this up forever.
 
Laggo
offline
Link
 
I am #11 right now and go up about 2-3 spots a game

Seems guaranteed I will at least crack top 10, top 3 doesn't seem impossible but I'll need at least 3 or 4 good games (half of them being against sophmores)

Update on the race to 160 TD's

Yukiko managed to pick up 6 TD's (versus a playoff Sophmore team) and 6 TD's (in our boring league matchup) to bring the total to 126 with 5 games remaining.

34 TD's are left to acquire, needing an average of 6.8 per game to hit the goal.

Keep Truckin' Yukiko!
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Laggo
Yukiko managed to pick up 6 TD's (versus a playoff Sophmore team)


Trying to understand if this is supposed to mean something.
 
Laggo
offline
Link
 
If it's so easy why isn't everybody doing it *shrug*
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Laggo
If it's so easy why isn't everybody doing it *shrug*


I'm pretty sure everyone could if they threw 90 times a game
 
Laggo
offline
Link
 
What's stopping them then?
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Laggo
What's stopping them then?


Heterosexuality
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.