oh would've been nice to know about this for today's game lolme
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Experimental Heuristic Module for Man Coverage Assignment Logic
Originally posted by Homage
oh would've been nice to know about this for today's game lolme
Pretty sure that's what your opposition is saying x2
oh would've been nice to know about this for today's game lolme
Pretty sure that's what your opposition is saying x2
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by foofighter24
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
A heuristic is essentially a rule of thumb - a logical way of approaching things, based on how they usually work out.
"When judging new players to sign to my rookie team last season, I used "having GLB1 trophies" as a heuristic of skill in the game".
A 100% foolproof rule? No, that isn't what hueristics are. A decent way to quickly judge things? Sure.
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
A heuristic is essentially a rule of thumb - a logical way of approaching things, based on how they usually work out.
"When judging new players to sign to my rookie team last season, I used "having GLB1 trophies" as a heuristic of skill in the game".
A 100% foolproof rule? No, that isn't what hueristics are. A decent way to quickly judge things? Sure.
-Phaytle-
offline
offline
Originally posted by foofighter24
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
Maybe, but we can google it if we don't understand... wait... so can you.
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
Maybe, but we can google it if we don't understand... wait... so can you.
NiborRis
offline
offline
Originally posted by foofighter24
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
foofighter24 doesn't know very much about heuristics.
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
foofighter24 doesn't know very much about heuristics.
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by pottsman
A heuristic is essentially a rule of thumb - a logical way of approaching things, based on how they usually work out.
"When judging new players to sign to my rookie team last season, I used "having GLB1 trophies" as a heuristic of skill in the game".
A 100% foolproof rule? No, that isn't what hueristics are. A decent way to quickly judge things? Sure.
Also, to put it into better, GLB context - this rule sets up how players will be covered by LBs and the secondary. Will there be a few plays where a linebacker or safety covers a tight end on the "wrong" side of the formation? Possibly. But on most plays, it should work fine to keep people covered by a fairly logical player.
A heuristic is essentially a rule of thumb - a logical way of approaching things, based on how they usually work out.
"When judging new players to sign to my rookie team last season, I used "having GLB1 trophies" as a heuristic of skill in the game".
A 100% foolproof rule? No, that isn't what hueristics are. A decent way to quickly judge things? Sure.
Also, to put it into better, GLB context - this rule sets up how players will be covered by LBs and the secondary. Will there be a few plays where a linebacker or safety covers a tight end on the "wrong" side of the formation? Possibly. But on most plays, it should work fine to keep people covered by a fairly logical player.
Originally posted by -Phaytle-
Maybe, but we can google it if we don't understand... wait... so can you.
Dude, loosen up. Everytime you post there is a hint of stickupyourassedness. Yeah, for most questions people post on here they could find the answer in a few minutes of research but posting and communicating on the forums is half the game. Getwitit.
Maybe, but we can google it if we don't understand... wait... so can you.
Dude, loosen up. Everytime you post there is a hint of stickupyourassedness. Yeah, for most questions people post on here they could find the answer in a few minutes of research but posting and communicating on the forums is half the game. Getwitit.
So is the lack of conversation about this because its working well or because nobody is using it? Lol
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
So is the lack of conversation about this because its working well or because nobody is using it? Lol
It has made all passing sets very interesting. I've seen numerous teams getting very creative with the 5 WR defense now, a lot of All Dogs GO and Storm Brave against the 5 WR set now. It will end up stopping teh 5 WR spam in the Rookie Leagues.
So is the lack of conversation about this because its working well or because nobody is using it? Lol
It has made all passing sets very interesting. I've seen numerous teams getting very creative with the 5 WR defense now, a lot of All Dogs GO and Storm Brave against the 5 WR set now. It will end up stopping teh 5 WR spam in the Rookie Leagues.
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by foofighter24
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
I used a heuristic technique to solve the problem quicker.
Can someone use "heuristic" in a sentence for me?
I used a heuristic technique to solve the problem quicker.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
It has made all passing sets very interesting. I've seen numerous teams getting very creative with the 5 WR defense now, a lot of All Dogs GO and Storm Brave against the 5 WR set now. It will end up stopping teh 5 WR spam in the Rookie Leagues.
all dogs go? there isnt an all dogs go against a 5 WR set
It has made all passing sets very interesting. I've seen numerous teams getting very creative with the 5 WR defense now, a lot of All Dogs GO and Storm Brave against the 5 WR set now. It will end up stopping teh 5 WR spam in the Rookie Leagues.
all dogs go? there isnt an all dogs go against a 5 WR set
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
all dogs go? there isnt an all dogs go against a 5 WR set
exploit, he runs plays not built for the situation against certain situations.
He explained how he did it in one of the 4wr threads a while ago.
all dogs go? there isnt an all dogs go against a 5 WR set
exploit, he runs plays not built for the situation against certain situations.
He explained how he did it in one of the 4wr threads a while ago.
hiimjake
offline
offline
That Dogs All Go shouldn't even work vs. 5 WR sets. How much pass awareness does a QB have to have to see one of his WRs isn't even being covered?
Originally posted by hiimjake
That Dogs All Go shouldn't even work vs. 5 WR sets. How much pass awareness does a QB have to have to see one of his WRs isn't even being covered?
he has to go through his progressions...
That Dogs All Go shouldn't even work vs. 5 WR sets. How much pass awareness does a QB have to have to see one of his WRs isn't even being covered?
he has to go through his progressions...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
