Ya both my LB's are pretty jack of all trades like and do pretty well for themselves.
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > What position is the toughest to build?
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/19203
Oh cool he just played us!
0.5 sack 0 tkls? hmm
nice L
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/19203
Oh cool he just played us!
0.5 sack 0 tkls? hmm
nice L
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/19203
Oh cool he just played us!
0.5 sack 0 tkls? hmm
28-21
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/19203
Oh cool he just played us!
0.5 sack 0 tkls? hmm
28-21
Originally posted by Corndog
28-21
Is tht because combo dots are better or because I have no idea how to offense yet?
28-21
Is tht because combo dots are better or because I have no idea how to offense yet?
E-A-G-L-E-S
offline
offline
Why's offense the issue? 21 points is enough to win a game with. 28 points allowed is too much
Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Don't think anyone said he was crappy built. The "Jack of all trades" comment was that ya if you are building around a bunch of attributes that are not all that meaningful to coverage, that isn't because building a coverage LB is really hard cuz there are all these attributes. It just means you are building around a jack of all trades.
Yeah, I was just messing around. The reason I am putting zone coverage in my guy is because our defense runs strictly zone. I have a set of "Level 1" skills and "Level 2" skills that I assign to each of my players. They range between 4 - 6 skills per level. Level 1 skills will be highest priority, followed by Level 2 skills. I don't touch the other skills unless needed. Zone coverage and coverage tech are in Level 2.
Don't think anyone said he was crappy built. The "Jack of all trades" comment was that ya if you are building around a bunch of attributes that are not all that meaningful to coverage, that isn't because building a coverage LB is really hard cuz there are all these attributes. It just means you are building around a jack of all trades.
Yeah, I was just messing around. The reason I am putting zone coverage in my guy is because our defense runs strictly zone. I have a set of "Level 1" skills and "Level 2" skills that I assign to each of my players. They range between 4 - 6 skills per level. Level 1 skills will be highest priority, followed by Level 2 skills. I don't touch the other skills unless needed. Zone coverage and coverage tech are in Level 2.
Edited by nortobc on Feb 6, 2014 08:23:10
Edited by nortobc on Feb 6, 2014 08:22:56
Time Trial
offline
offline
This is pretty typical of my "Cover" LBs:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/11734
Tackling Tech - 25
Power Tackling - 44
Break Run Block - 30
Hold Ground- 30
Blitz Awareness - 40
Def Con - 43
Pursuit - 30
Man Aware - 25
Zone Aware - 40
Cover Tech - 41
Deflecting - 41
Balance - 25
Quickness - 25
Foot work - 15
Sprinting - 35
Vertical - 20
Conditioning - 20
Intimidation - 26
Heart - 13
Showboat - 1
Monster Hit - 1
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/11734
Tackling Tech - 25
Power Tackling - 44
Break Run Block - 30
Hold Ground- 30
Blitz Awareness - 40
Def Con - 43
Pursuit - 30
Man Aware - 25
Zone Aware - 40
Cover Tech - 41
Deflecting - 41
Balance - 25
Quickness - 25
Foot work - 15
Sprinting - 35
Vertical - 20
Conditioning - 20
Intimidation - 26
Heart - 13
Showboat - 1
Monster Hit - 1
Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
Why's offense the issue? 21 points is enough to win a game with. 28 points allowed is too much
Offense puts the points on the board? Is this a serious question?
2 points is enough to win a game with, what logic are you speaking from.
None as usual I am guessing?
Why's offense the issue? 21 points is enough to win a game with. 28 points allowed is too much
Offense puts the points on the board? Is this a serious question?
2 points is enough to win a game with, what logic are you speaking from.
None as usual I am guessing?
E-A-G-L-E-S
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Offense puts the points on the board? Is this a serious question?
2 points is enough to win a game with, what logic are you speaking from.
None as usual I am guessing?
once again your ineptitude shines through.
your team loses game.
you blame offense, as always.
offense put up reasonable amount of points, defense played horrible.
"offense fault not my fault" aka "my multis fault not my fault"
someone say "why offense fault offense did fine"
"ur dumb ur ded lolololololololol =====D ~~~ O="
Offense puts the points on the board? Is this a serious question?
2 points is enough to win a game with, what logic are you speaking from.
None as usual I am guessing?
once again your ineptitude shines through.
your team loses game.
you blame offense, as always.
offense put up reasonable amount of points, defense played horrible.
"offense fault not my fault" aka "my multis fault not my fault"
someone say "why offense fault offense did fine"
"ur dumb ur ded lolololololololol =====D ~~~ O="
Laggo
offline
offline
Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
once again your ineptitude shines through.
your team loses game.
you blame offense, as always.
offense put up reasonable amount of points, defense played horrible.
"offense fault not my fault" aka "my multis fault not my fault"
someone say "why offense fault offense did fine"
"ur dumb ur ded lolololololololol =====D ~~~ O="
to be fair 21 points in this game is not the same as 21 points in real football
TBH if your offense isn't putting up 40 to 50~ average points a game you are doing something very wrong. There are way too many bad teams in this game to not be able to score efficiently.
Unless you are playing some weird kind of possession scheme where you take TE's over WR's and run 90% of the time to run clock but make first downs, but I think this is still just theory at this point.
once again your ineptitude shines through.
your team loses game.
you blame offense, as always.
offense put up reasonable amount of points, defense played horrible.
"offense fault not my fault" aka "my multis fault not my fault"
someone say "why offense fault offense did fine"
"ur dumb ur ded lolololololololol =====D ~~~ O="
to be fair 21 points in this game is not the same as 21 points in real football
TBH if your offense isn't putting up 40 to 50~ average points a game you are doing something very wrong. There are way too many bad teams in this game to not be able to score efficiently.
Unless you are playing some weird kind of possession scheme where you take TE's over WR's and run 90% of the time to run clock but make first downs, but I think this is still just theory at this point.
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by Laggo
to be fair 21 points in this game is not the same as 21 points in real football
TBH if your offense isn't putting up 40 to 50~ average points a game you are doing something very wrong. There are way too many bad teams in this game to not be able to score efficiently.
Unless you are playing some weird kind of possession scheme where you take TE's over WR's and run 90% of the time to run clock but make first downs, but I think this is still just theory at this point.
I am doing something wrong, because as a DC I can hold offenses to 6 points a game or less, but as an OC I struggle to score 10 . . .
to be fair 21 points in this game is not the same as 21 points in real football
TBH if your offense isn't putting up 40 to 50~ average points a game you are doing something very wrong. There are way too many bad teams in this game to not be able to score efficiently.
Unless you are playing some weird kind of possession scheme where you take TE's over WR's and run 90% of the time to run clock but make first downs, but I think this is still just theory at this point.
I am doing something wrong, because as a DC I can hold offenses to 6 points a game or less, but as an OC I struggle to score 10 . . .
Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
once again your ineptitude shines through.
If coordinated you would know, but you don't so I will let this slide...
an Offense putting up 208 yards is by no means satisfactory enough to win a game.
You know atleast with the upper levels of competition I am playing (what you haven't experienced.)
once again your ineptitude shines through.
If coordinated you would know, but you don't so I will let this slide...
an Offense putting up 208 yards is by no means satisfactory enough to win a game.
You know atleast with the upper levels of competition I am playing (what you haven't experienced.)
E-A-G-L-E-S
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
If coordinated you would know, but you don't so I will let this slide...
an Offense putting up 208 yards is by no means satisfactory enough to win a game.
You know atleast with the upper levels of competition I am playing (what you haven't experienced.)
It's not competition if you lose every game LOL
If coordinated you would know, but you don't so I will let this slide...
an Offense putting up 208 yards is by no means satisfactory enough to win a game.
You know atleast with the upper levels of competition I am playing (what you haven't experienced.)
It's not competition if you lose every game LOL
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
