Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Galithor
It's an experimental dot. He's building it this way just to see how soon it's possible to attain various benchmarks. A point that's clearly gone over the head of most posters in the thread. It's less brag thread, more shared research thread.

Exactly. But as Forest's mom said: stupid is as stupid does.

To be honest, my player isn't that far behind Longhorn's player. It's the same idea, though. See what speed does in this sim.

Someone using the inspect vpb hasn't done all the research yet?

Originally posted by tvhs96
To be honest, my player isn't that far behind Longhorn's player. It's the same idea, though. See what speed does in this sim.

Speed undoubtedly kills. So does no speed. Pretty much life's a bitch for DC's unless Corndog and Bort ruin the party.

Originally posted by bhall43
Speed undoubtedly kills. So does no speed. Pretty much life's a bitch for DC's unless Corndog and Bort ruin the party.

At least as long as you keep the "never run zone because it sucks" mentality.

Originally posted by Corndog
At least as long as you keep the "never run zone because it sucks" mentality.



Woah woah woah. I wouldn't build a Bonn dynamo zone defense because it got straight carved up like a thanksgiving turkey when I tested it. But that isn't to say I wouldn't ever use some of those zone defenses. However not being able to use some of them against the formations I'd like to and not really having much control over when certain ones are used is scary bro.

Originally posted by bhall43
Woah woah woah. I wouldn't build a Bonn dynamo zone defense because it got straight carved up like a thanksgiving turkey when I tested it. But that isn't to say I wouldn't ever use some of those zone defenses. However not being able to use some of them against the formations I'd like to and not really having much control over when certain ones are used is scary bro.

My test team ran a lot of zones, and had one of the better defenses.

The pre-change zones were admittedly godawful and halfassedly thrown together by someone who was stuck in the GLB mentality of "zones are worthless". When your idea of zones is the same bad play three times for a formation with the only difference being "shallow" and "deep" within the zone, it's going to be pretty bad.

And the original incarnation of defensive plays had almost no robbers.

First sub 5 second 40 to break a player?

My player is sitting at 4.82 because ... why not?