Warrior General Games

Originally posted by andersonba1210
Well your squad will be in gold next season. So your team, plus mine as well as Subversive is at least 3 no/no teams.

Maybe we will inspire more to join us!

Dotball Fairy Pirates going No/No too

Really it isn't so much up to the teams as it is to the Dot makers.

How long do you think 1-2 one-man teams will pay $1,000,000 a day to play this game when they see everyone else playing for free?

Don't ask Gold teams not to boost or custom, ask those people who make dots to build MORE no/no dots rather than ANY yes/yes dots...

I promise you that you can easily get your dot on a good team being no/no.

I imagine silver would actually be competitive if all Yes/Yes dots were divided out into the same cost in No/No dots....



Another idea would be for us PeeWee guys to build a rookie team together, that way we can suck up all the Free Players and not feel like we are wasting them.

Originally posted by Burger Kang
Really it isn't so much up to the teams as it is to the Dot makers.

How long do you think 1-2 one-man teams will pay $1,000,000 a day to play this game when they see everyone else playing for free?

Don't ask Gold teams not to boost or custom, ask those people who make dots to build MORE no/no dots rather than ANY yes/yes dots...

I promise you that you can easily get your dot on a good team being no/no.

I imagine silver would actually be competitive if all Yes/Yes dots were divided out into the same cost in No/No dots....



Another idea would be for us PeeWee guys to build a rookie team together, that way we can suck up all the Free Players and not feel like we are wasting them.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5137254&page=1

gimme ur free dots

Originally posted by Burger Kang
Really it isn't so much up to the teams as it is to the Dot makers.

How long do you think 1-2 one-man teams will pay $1,000,000 a day to play this game when they see everyone else playing for free?


I think it's all about those 1-2 man teams though. They make up most of the top teams in the league. If they didn't boost, then most other teams wouldn't have to recruit to find boosting agents that can actually build PW dots. I doubt anyone really enjoys that. So it's more on the guys like Gerr, LE, AI, Tazmann, Whodey, jkid, slybert, and the few that build for Hired Guns.

Originally posted by andersonba1210
Well your squad will be in gold next season. So your team, plus mine as well as Subversive is at least 3 no/no teams.

Maybe we will inspire more to join us!

We are recruiting boosters for next season...

we might be partial boost, partial no/no depending on how well the recruiting process goes...

I prefer just a 2-4 agent team of no/nos. Well built dots seem a lot better than the headaches of random agents. They don't build right, go inactive, don't boost, don't set the tactics you want, don't get or upgrade EQ, etc. The team just never feels or plays right.

I know people would love PWG to go no-no, but be careful of what you ask for on the forums as the admins have handed down bans for talk like this. Remember that boosting pays their salary, so they will be quick to put a stop to any talk of this.

With that being said, I will follow what ever direction most people are going. However, not making any comments as to which way I think it should go.

Originally posted by Gerr
I know people would love PWG to go no-no, but be careful of what you ask for on the forums as the admins have handed down bans for talk like this. Remember that boosting pays their salary, so they will be quick to put a stop to any talk of this.

With that being said, I will follow what ever direction most people are going. However, not making any comments as to which way I think it should go.

This is true. As I have said throughout the post, we are going no/no. It would be fun to see others do the same but in now way am I recruiting teams for no/no. Just wanted to make everyone aware of our changes in the upcoming season.

Originally posted by Gerr
I know people would love PWG to go no-no, but be careful of what you ask for on the forums as the admins have handed down bans for talk like this. Remember that boosting pays their salary, so they will be quick to put a stop to any talk of this.

With that being said, I will follow what ever direction most people are going. However, not making any comments as to which way I think it should go.

I think if they allowed agents to "talk" more and have these discussions they would make more money in the long run... Handing out bans and booting customers doesn't make sense.

Imagine if companies like Wal-Mart and Target banned people from shopping in there store because they made negative comments about product and service. They never would. They would LOSE too much money. Loss of cash flow = close up shop.

Originally posted by bryceps2
I think if they allowed agents to "talk" more and have these discussions they would make more money in the long run... Handing out bans and booting customers doesn't make sense.

Imagine if companies like Wal-Mart and Target banned people from shopping in there store because they made negative comments about product and service. They never would. They would LOSE too much money. Loss of cash flow = close up shop.

Never forget! Not all who own a business are good business men... Lessons learned from business school!

Business school? Where?

Originally posted by JBStar23
Business school? Where?

John Brown University. Business program.

Originally posted by Gerr
I know people would love PWG to go no-no, but be careful of what you ask for on the forums as the admins have handed down bans for talk like this. Remember that boosting pays their salary, so they will be quick to put a stop to any talk of this.

With that being said, I will follow what ever direction most people are going. However, not making any comments as to which way I think it should go.

yes I comment with trepidation about this discussion, which is partly why I have been an advocate for CEQs which hopefully would be to the satisfaction for those of which wield the ban hammer! ...who knows, it could very well be more profitable for bort and co, should this motivate more within the realms of GLB to be involved with peewee! ...and of course, we all know that someone would try to use CEQs on the sly

I think it might just lead to more PW players playing regular and more regular players playing PW. Seems like a win-win for them