Originally posted by Bladnach
Originally posted by GMathiasf
In addition, teams were buying EQ on an availability of money basis. Valhalla had an entire team of level 72 equipped dots. Made a huge difference.
And a team of mostyl all 3-4 aeq with +3attribute and +5%aeq that was all double/triple stacked team wide to go along with coordinating stacking VAs. People had a few dots here and there with good attributes and stuff but no one else came close to having a 55man roster quite like that. Madcow could've gotten out of the 1st round with the advantage alloy had
I think it's funny that people keep making excuses as to why Valhalla was so successful.
When you win, what was it, 59 of 60 games? with your only loss by 2 points then it goes without saying that you were superior to your opponents in a lot of different ways. EQ, VAs, builds, player levels, gameplans, Valhalla was among the best at every aspect.
Originally posted by GMathiasf
In addition, teams were buying EQ on an availability of money basis. Valhalla had an entire team of level 72 equipped dots. Made a huge difference.
And a team of mostyl all 3-4 aeq with +3attribute and +5%aeq that was all double/triple stacked team wide to go along with coordinating stacking VAs. People had a few dots here and there with good attributes and stuff but no one else came close to having a 55man roster quite like that. Madcow could've gotten out of the 1st round with the advantage alloy had
I think it's funny that people keep making excuses as to why Valhalla was so successful.
When you win, what was it, 59 of 60 games? with your only loss by 2 points then it goes without saying that you were superior to your opponents in a lot of different ways. EQ, VAs, builds, player levels, gameplans, Valhalla was among the best at every aspect.