Warrior General Games

And if what I said was so wrong, where were you after this GM, Sparky?
Originally posted by prthdinhoc
Originally posted by Cruzi

Why is it offensive? Something about dead puppies hurt your feelings?

No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

Originally posted by Cruzi

I would be highly disappointed if the bitch contingent at GLB was that great.

Originally posted by Cruzi

I guess that's part of being born without a vagina.

Originally posted by Cruzi
nancy boy.


Yah you dont sound whiney here at all, my mistake.

Originally posted by Cruzi

Who said it did? Reading. Man, it must be harder than I thought.


lol @ cruzi... dude I have read more in one day than you have in your entire life, and comic books dont count.

BTW the PC comment was in referance to this...

Originally posted by bobmoult

I think this is way blown out of proportion. Only idiotic PC idiots think this is offensive

And this was probably one of the more idiotic posts.

So it's not the reading you struggle with, but the comprehension. Forgive me.

Originally posted by Rudger
Originally posted by Cruzi


I would be highly disappointed if the bitch contingent at GLB was that great.

Originally posted by Cruzi


I guess that's part of being born without a vagina.

Originally posted by Cruzi

nancy boy.


Yah you dont sound whiney here at all, my mistake.

That's called pointing and laughing at a whiner, hoss. But feel free to keep reaching and failing. Gives me someone else to point and laugh at.

Originally posted by Cruzi
Originally posted by Rudger

Originally posted by Cruzi



I would be highly disappointed if the bitch contingent at GLB was that great.

Originally posted by Cruzi



I guess that's part of being born without a vagina.

Originally posted by Cruzi


nancy boy.


Yah you dont sound whiney here at all, my mistake.

That's called pointing and laughing at a whiner, hoss. But feel free to keep reaching and failing. Gives me someone else to point and laugh at.

Whiner? At what point was I whining? I merely pointed out that glorifying the torture and death by electrocution, drowning, slamming the dog to the ground, is offensive. If that makes me a nancy boy, vagina, whiner, or bitch, so be it. I would much rather be called those things for taking a small stand against glorifying or even making light of Michael Vick's crimes than be a complete and utter fucking asshole for no reason whatsoever like yourself. You are not offended by the name, fine, you want to speak out in support of the name, fine, that's your decision, but you do neither. You just sit back and toss 5th grade insults at someone who had the balls to take somewhat of a stand and appeal to normal decency INSTEAD of running straight to support. If that makes me a bitch in your book, that's fine by me.

You call that squalling nonsensical garbage "having balls" and "taking a stand"? Hysterical. What a sheltered life you've had if you think having the "courage" to cry in public is a form of bravery. I've seen 5th graders with thicker skin than you.

Tell me more about how ballsy you are. Please. I want to be a real hero just like you.

Originally posted by Cruzi
You call that squalling nonsensical garbage "having balls" and "taking a stand"? Hysterical. What a sheltered life you've had if you think having the "courage" to cry in public is a form of bravery. I've seen 5th graders with thicker skin than you.

Tell me more about how ballsy you are. Please. I want to be a real hero just like you.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. I started this thread saying that the name was strange and offensive. You could've said, "I don't think it's offensive and here's why", or "why does that offend you, people kill everyday", or something to that effect, but instead you chose to attack me for my belief that what he did was wrong. You obviously feel it was within the realm of normal human decency to do what Vick did, or you wouldn't carry on like this, but I guess I'll stoop to your level:

Go back to your fucking trailer, cook your meth, host dog fights, and hope like hell the police catch you before a decent human being with a concealed carry permit does.

Originally posted by prthdinhoc

Go back to your fucking trailer, cook your meth, host dog fights, and hope like hell the police catch you before a decent human being with a concealed carry permit does.

Now that's the type of class I expect of a whiner. Bravo.

Not sure how this got twisted into anything related to dogfighting, but bravo for that too.

Originally posted by prthdinhoc

This is exactly what I'm talking about. I started this thread saying that the name was strange and offensive. You could've said, "I don't think it's offensive and here's why", or "why does that offend you, people kill everyday", or something to that effect, but instead you chose to attack me for my belief that what he did was wrong.
Did I?

Originally posted by Cruzi
Why is it offensive? Something about dead puppies hurt your feelings?

How, pray tell, was that an "attack"?

Originally posted by prthdinhoc
No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

Looks to me like you're the one who went on the offensive there, my little cry baby. But, hey. You know what they say. Don't ever let the facts get in the way of your argument.

Originally posted by
You obviously feel it was within the realm of normal human decency to do what Vick did, or you wouldn't carry on like this

Now where have I even implied, alluded to, or indicated in the least that I have participated in, supported, condoned, or believed in dog fighting?

Again, those facts sure don't mean a damn thing to you when it's time to fly off the handle like a drunken step-father, do they?

What a fucking tool you are. Hilarious.


This is about you getting your fallopian tubes in a knot over the name "Ghost Dogz". I don't care who you are or what you believe. It takes a terminally lame individual to get this worked up over the name of a team on some MMORPG, and an even lamer individual to try and spin it into whether or not dog fighting is bad.

Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

Originally posted by cruzi
Originally posted by prthdinhoc

No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

Looks to me like you're the one who went on the offensive there, my little cry baby. But, hey. You know what they say. Don't ever let the facts get in the way of your argument.


Not so fast, my gender-obsessed friend. You're the one who's been copy/pasting "reading comprehension d00d!" in every other post yet you come back with something this incredibly stupid in the very same thread?

Given your dedication to reading comprehension we can surmise you're familiar with the use of "if" and "then" (including implied) in sentence structure. Thus, the only reasonable conclusion, since you feel he "went on the offensive" rather than making a simple if/then statement, is that you do indeed think there is nothing wrong with "raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak" (the qualifier).

You then proceeded to argue and whine (yes, whining about someone else's opinion is still whining) your way back to this:

Originally posted by cruzi
Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

So which is it, kolpophobic waffler? Go ahead, take a stand for once in your life even if it is just on a remote message forum. I promise no one will call you childish names for it. Do you find dog fighting cruel and wrong or do you not?

Originally posted by Doger



Originally posted by cruzi

Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

So which is it, kolpophobic waffler? Go ahead, take a stand for once in your life even if it is just on a remote message forum. I promise no one will call you childish names for it. Do you find dog fighting cruel and wrong or do you not?


Looks like he just answered that for you. Why ask again?

Originally posted by Doger
Originally posted by cruzi

Originally posted by prthdinhoc


No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

Looks to me like you're the one who went on the offensive there, my little cry baby. But, hey. You know what they say. Don't ever let the facts get in the way of your argument.


Not so fast, my gender-obsessed friend. You're the one who's been copy/pasting "reading comprehension d00d!" in every other post yet you come back with something this incredibly stupid in the very same thread?

Given your dedication to reading comprehension we can surmise you're familiar with the use of "if" and "then" (including implied) in sentence structure. Thus, the only reasonable conclusion, since you feel he "went on the offensive" rather than making a simple if/then statement, is that you do indeed think there is nothing wrong with "raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak" (the qualifier).

You then proceeded to argue and whine (yes, whining about someone else's opinion is still whining) your way back to this:

Originally posted by cruzi

Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

So which is it, kolpophobic waffler? Go ahead, take a stand for once in your life even if it is just on a remote message forum. I promise no one will call you childish names for it. Do you find dog fighting cruel and wrong or do you not?


You finally decide to jump in, and this is what you come with.

http://archive.salon.com/people/bc/2001/03/06/chuck_barris/story.jpg

Failure.

Hilarious, isn't it? The simp tries to flip the reading comprehension bit around on me, then asks something that's clearly just been answered, pretending that I've somehow contradicted myself. If I have, dear fool. Please, be a good boy and show me where.

Originally posted by Cruzi
You call that squalling nonsensical garbage "having balls" and "taking a stand"?

You think "having balls" and "taking a stand" are nonsensical garbage? I guess that tells us lots about your sad life.

Originally posted by Cruzi


You finally decide to jump in, and this is what you come with.

http://archive.salon.com/people/bc/2001/03/06/chuck_barris/story.jpg

Failure.

Hilarious, isn't it? The simp tries to flip the reading comprehension bit around on me, then asks something that's clearly just been answered, pretending that I've somehow contradicted myself. If I have, dear fool. Please, be a good boy and show me where.

"Failure"? Are you a 12 year old or something? Isnt that part of some idiotic new internet culture...


This whole thing seems to boil down to, you wanting to spit in the face of people with morals. Then calling them highschool playground names in an effort to discredit legitimate arguements. I guess its your sad attempt at being "metal" or "anti-establishment", when realy all you come of as is a dick.

Originally posted by Cruzi
Originally posted by Doger

Originally posted by cruzi


Originally posted by prthdinhoc



No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

Looks to me like you're the one who went on the offensive there, my little cry baby. But, hey. You know what they say. Don't ever let the facts get in the way of your argument.


Not so fast, my gender-obsessed friend. You're the one who's been copy/pasting "reading comprehension d00d!" in every other post yet you come back with something this incredibly stupid in the very same thread?

Given your dedication to reading comprehension we can surmise you're familiar with the use of "if" and "then" (including implied) in sentence structure. Thus, the only reasonable conclusion, since you feel he "went on the offensive" rather than making a simple if/then statement, is that you do indeed think there is nothing wrong with "raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak" (the qualifier).

You then proceeded to argue and whine (yes, whining about someone else's opinion is still whining) your way back to this:

Originally posted by cruzi


Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

So which is it, kolpophobic waffler? Go ahead, take a stand for once in your life even if it is just on a remote message forum. I promise no one will call you childish names for it. Do you find dog fighting cruel and wrong or do you not?


You finally decide to jump in, and this is what you come with.

http://archive.salon.com/people/bc/2001/03/06/chuck_barris/story.jpg

Failure.

Hilarious, isn't it? The simp tries to flip the reading comprehension bit around on me, then asks something that's clearly just been answered, pretending that I've somehow contradicted myself. If I have, dear fool. Please, be a good boy and show me where.

That wasn't even a good try at side stepping the question. You can do better than that!

You answered the question twice (sorry you didn't catch that part, bluesguy), with opposing answers, making your true beliefs still undeclared. So which is it, do you find the practice wrong or do you enjoy it? C'mon, you can do it, I know you can!

Rudger, yes, he is just trying to appear anti-establishment, which is all the rage these days and very popular among those easily lead around by their nose. Most of them haven't yet learned the difference between open-minded and simple-minded, but they generally will with time.

Originally posted by bluesguy07
Originally posted by Doger


Originally posted by cruzi


Dog fighting is fucking cruel and senseless. At no point in this thread has that fact even come up for debate. But nice try with the labeling. You failed miserably. But nice try.

So which is it, kolpophobic waffler? Go ahead, take a stand for once in your life even if it is just on a remote message forum. I promise no one will call you childish names for it. Do you find dog fighting cruel and wrong or do you not?


Looks like he just answered that for you. Why ask again?


Sticking up for your boss is somewhat admirable, but you as well fail to see how the dimwitted metalhead contradicted himself. Doger tried to clarify for you, but I see it needs to broken down further:

When he felt this:

Originally posted by prthdinhoc

No, it does not hurt my feelings, but if you don't think there is something wrong with raising dogs to fight to the death and personally torture and kill the ones who are weak, you are a fucking piece of trash.

was a personal attack here:

Originally posted by Cruzi


Looks to me like you're the one who went on the offensive there, my little cry baby. But, hey. You know what they say. Don't ever let the facts get in the way of your argument.



he simply affirmed what I had said, in that, IF you approve of what was done, THEN you are a fucking piece of trash.

Only later did he backtrack what he seems to believe, so as Doger so eloquently asked, which is it?