User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > List for new S17 WL teams
Page:
 
SunshineMan89
offline
Link
 
Monowi will be finding new and creative ways to lose games.
 
GP1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SunshineMan89
Monowi will be finding new and creative ways to lose games.


I can only think of one- ass whoopings.
 
OtisDriftwood
offline
Link
 
Let Carthage dig our feet in the sand.
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jrry32
LOL is coming back? I am PMing Hokie to tell him to gut.


What are you talking about. It took a while, but roughly 1/2 the players are the same ones that were on the team the first WL trip. I have a feeling they will do a little better than they did as sub lvl 40 players though.
 
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
Link
 
I'm saying about 75% of these teams are going to be one and dones.
 
blazzinken
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Originally posted by jrry32

LOL is coming back? I am PMing Hokie to tell him to gut.


What are you talking about. It took a while, but roughly 1/2 the players are the same ones that were on the team the first WL trip. I have a feeling they will do a little better than they did as sub lvl 40 players though.


Kind of Sounds like us, a ton of our players are still on the team for our first WL venture
Edited by blazzinken on Jul 12, 2010 13:17:02
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by blazzinken
Kind of Sounds like us, a ton of our players are still on the team for our first WL venture


Not my old-ass guard, though, fortunately.
 
jdros13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
I'm saying about 75% of these teams are going to be one and dones.


pretty sure that is usually the case....maybe not quite 75%, but the majority are one and done.

Those who are back for a 2nd time usually fare better than those who have never been in the WL before. Know what to expect immediately and typically built their roster to compete at the WL level, not just to get there.

A lot depends on how the conferences get split up as well....that's always the x-factor.
 
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
Link
 
Osaka
Smurfs
CMC
LOL

Are the 4 I feel the most comfortable saying have playoff chances.

But there are also a lot of teams I don't really know much about so who knows. What I do know is that the WL playoff teams 1-8 have been getting more and more competive (especially w/o valhalla). Any Given Sunday type situation is becoming more viable.
 
Ubasstards
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Osaka
Smurfs
CMC
LOL

Are the 4 I feel the most comfortable saying have playoff chances.

But there are also a lot of teams I don't really know much about so who knows. What I do know is that the WL playoff teams 1-8 have been getting more and more competive (especially w/o valhalla). Any Given Sunday type situation is becoming more viable.


and what teams are likely to demote?
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
and what teams are likely to demote?


Halifax imo.
 
Ubasstards
offline
Link
 
i.e. what teams barely got into playoffs and didnt have a youngish roster that can boost & improve
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i.e. what teams barely got into playoffs and didnt have a youngish roster that can boost & improve


Gunny.
 
Ubasstards
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ImTheScientist
Originally posted by Ubasstards

i.e. what teams barely got into playoffs and didnt have a youngish roster that can boost & improve


Gunny.


definitely not lol

They are getting one of my dots, may drop them down a bit..........but they also get level 72s now with the change, and that makes up for taking on my dot
Edited by Ubasstards on Jul 12, 2010 15:05:02
 
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i.e. what teams barely got into playoffs and didnt have a youngish roster that can boost & improve


Thats why I said they have a chance there is no guarantees and the returning 16 to the WL are extremely strong. The strongest yet I think, with extended plateau there are a lot less question marks surrounding returning teams also.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.