a new avi is selected.... gary was retired
Forum > Pro Leagues > to help liven the WL from the lolmid season blues.... pick my avi
Feudel
offline
offline
Originally posted by Whatsdafus
best one is replacing coleman
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3800200
you fail go away
best one is replacing coleman
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3800200
you fail go away
Whatsdafus
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
that avi sucks...this contest sucks!
your teams QB sucks!!! hey, wait a minute....
that avi sucks...this contest sucks!
your teams QB sucks!!! hey, wait a minute....
HoyaHater
offline
offline
I am not understanding what this thread has to do with the World League, per se. And it follows from that to wonder why one of these fine WL Mods hasn't locked it up yet, or indeed, deleted it entirely, as they did my much-more-relevant recent rant about the state of the game (following a blowout loss by the Hood, which I am DC for).
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
KingDan23
offline
offline
Originally posted by gocincinnati
I am not understanding what this thread has to do with the World League, per se. And it follows from that to wonder why one of these fine WL Mods hasn't locked it up yet, or indeed, deleted it entirely, as they did my much-more-relevant recent rant about the state of the game (following a blowout loss by the Hood, which I am DC for).
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
ITT the most you could have seen is one post by me and two posts from a moderator, so that is a lie my good man.
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like. It would be much more productive than spamming the threads here in the WL, I feel.
I am not understanding what this thread has to do with the World League, per se. And it follows from that to wonder why one of these fine WL Mods hasn't locked it up yet, or indeed, deleted it entirely, as they did my much-more-relevant recent rant about the state of the game (following a blowout loss by the Hood, which I am DC for).
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
ITT the most you could have seen is one post by me and two posts from a moderator, so that is a lie my good man.
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like. It would be much more productive than spamming the threads here in the WL, I feel.
JuniorMcSpiffy
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kingdan23
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like.
Then at the mod office Christmas party, they get together, break out the e-mails and have a good laugh. Rumors have it they do get read and addressed at other times, but Snopes.com says that's false.
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like.
Then at the mod office Christmas party, they get together, break out the e-mails and have a good laugh. Rumors have it they do get read and addressed at other times, but Snopes.com says that's false.
HoyaHater
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kingdan23
Originally posted by gocincinnati
I am not understanding what this thread has to do with the World League, per se. And it follows from that to wonder why one of these fine WL Mods hasn't locked it up yet, or indeed, deleted it entirely, as they did my much-more-relevant recent rant about the state of the game (following a blowout loss by the Hood, which I am DC for).
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
ITT the most you could have seen is one post by me and two posts from a moderator, so that is a lie my good man.
So basically you have no argument with the main thrust of my post, and lacking that, choose to instead attack a relatively minor side comment. Deflect criticism much?
Originally posted by Kingdan23
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like. It would be much more productive than spamming the threads here in the WL, I feel.
I like toying with victims. If you do not care to be toyed with, don't rattle my cage. I didn't start this.
Originally posted by gocincinnati
I am not understanding what this thread has to do with the World League, per se. And it follows from that to wonder why one of these fine WL Mods hasn't locked it up yet, or indeed, deleted it entirely, as they did my much-more-relevant recent rant about the state of the game (following a blowout loss by the Hood, which I am DC for).
I guess I should have specifically mentioned that Hood loss in the thread, to give it specific WL relevance.
But even without that, the thread was a hell of a lot more relevant than this silliness.
I have nothing against silliness. I have been known to engage in same myself from time to time.
What I am against is inconsistent standards when moderating a discussion forum. For a while now, I've been thinking to myself, "Wow, these WL Forum guys are pretty strict."
But apparently they are only strict when they want to be, since I have seen several posts by WL Mods in this very thread.
Kinda pisses me off, to be perfectly honest about it.
ITT the most you could have seen is one post by me and two posts from a moderator, so that is a lie my good man.
So basically you have no argument with the main thrust of my post, and lacking that, choose to instead attack a relatively minor side comment. Deflect criticism much?
Originally posted by Kingdan23
If you would like to complain about the moderating here in the WL please feel free to contact support or a Lead Mod if you like. It would be much more productive than spamming the threads here in the WL, I feel.
I like toying with victims. If you do not care to be toyed with, don't rattle my cage. I didn't start this.
Gturtle
offline
offline
Hey are we rattling cages?
Let me go get Christian Bale and Fake Katie Holmes they like that sort of thing
Let me go get Christian Bale and Fake Katie Holmes they like that sort of thing
JuniorMcSpiffy
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gturtle
Hey are we rattling cages?
Let me go get Christian Bale and Fake Katie Holmes they like that sort of thing
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
Hey are we rattling cages?
Let me go get Christian Bale and Fake Katie Holmes they like that sort of thing
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
Feudel
offline
offline
Originally posted by gocincinnati
I like toying with victims. If you do not care to be toyed with, don't rattle my cage. I didn't start this.
easy there Tony Dungy Jr.
I like toying with victims. If you do not care to be toyed with, don't rattle my cage. I didn't start this.
easy there Tony Dungy Jr.
Gturtle
offline
offline
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
DON'T RATTLE MY CAGE, BRO
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
DON'T RATTLE MY CAGE, BRO
JuniorMcSpiffy
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gturtle
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
DON'T RATTLE MY CAGE, BRO
You don't fucking understand what it's like with forumwarriors, that's what that is.
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
You and me, we're fucking done, loldotballedly.
DON'T RATTLE MY CAGE, BRO
You don't fucking understand what it's like with forumwarriors, that's what that is.
Gturtle
offline
offline
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
You don't fucking understand what it's like with forumwarriors, that's what that is.
No, you don't get it- the shitty thread he created was on topic and this less shitty (though still marginal) thread isn't and since his shitty thread got locked he wants to exact revenge on the moderators because he is the shitty DC of a shitty team, goddammit
You don't fucking understand what it's like with forumwarriors, that's what that is.
No, you don't get it- the shitty thread he created was on topic and this less shitty (though still marginal) thread isn't and since his shitty thread got locked he wants to exact revenge on the moderators because he is the shitty DC of a shitty team, goddammit
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.