User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > California + WL = lulz
Page:
 
Jiddy78
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by superpunk


"THE MORE STAMINA YOU HAVE THE BETTER YOU PERFORM! BORT SAID SO!!!"


 
supbro
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jiddy78
"THE MORE STAMINA YOU HAVE THE BETTER YOU PERFORM!"




that's what she said...
 
California
knows how to party
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by supbro
that's what she said...


My girl likes that I have 18 in Power Through
 
supbro
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by California
My girl likes that I have 18 in Power Through


no u don't.
 
California
knows how to party
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by supbro
no u don't.


ok, it's actually like 3... 3.5 maybe
 
Victory Jones
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by California
Originally posted by Victory Jones

actually all he wanted was an explanation cuz your math didnt jive.

you didnt like having to explain yourself...

and yes we did build a team that season (most are here: http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1702)... you'll see them here in a few seasons.



Yeah I don't math for anybody and have never ever bothered "to do the math" to prove things one way or another. But I think it's clear at this point that 60 STR at C wasn't going to get it done. Fair to say?


sure, but his point wasnt that the Center should only take strength to 60...

it was that the math you were offering up in the build plans didnt add up.

you were like: get strength to 68 by level X...

he was like: thats mathmatically impossible to do that by that level, your math was wrong. see lemme show you using the Center position as an example

you were then like: fuck off, you'll do what I say, when I say

we were like: uhm... really?

and then you banned us all...

Originally posted by California

It's interesting how people remember things to back up their own twisted point of view.


indeed it is Cali.

indeed it is.

Edited by Victory Jones on Jan 19, 2010 09:29:13
 
Victory Jones
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by California
Originally posted by supbro

no u don't.


ok, it's actually like 3... 3.5 maybe


Ive got Bedroom General maxed...

its one of the reasons I keep makin babies everytime I so much as drink out of the same glass as Baby Momma...
 
Link
 
WAHT MAN?

I can't hear you because you're on ignore for having a seizure inducing avatar that is the suck. For the love of Bert change that shit.
 
jamz
offline
Link
 
TTSB, WL Record for most locked parody thread?

GET THIS MAN A LOLTROPHY, DD. DO IT NAO
 
California
knows how to party
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Victory Jones
indeed it is Cali.

indeed it is.



Our guides had nothing about levels within them. We had build plans that extended into borderline useless minor attributes. They'd have "Take carrying to 40" for TEs and "Take confidence to 35" for SSs. So I know for a fact that if I ever even mentioned "attribute to X by level Y" sort of discussion, it was only a very rough estimation and nothing I would have argued about.

Feel free to get ICRockets in here, I'm pretty sure that's the guy who had beef with the build plan. And I'm pretty damn sure it had everything to do with his interpretation of autolevel gains being the highest for any position at C, and therefore that it wasn't necessary to take STR to 68 because it'd be a waste of SPs.

I PMed dmfa41. He had a C on the team and he'll remember what our C guides were like far better than me.
 
California
knows how to party
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
WAHT MAN?

I can't hear you because you're on ignore for having a seizure inducing avatar that is the suck. For the love of Bert change that shit.


wat
 
cowtesticles2001
udder pressure
offline
Link
 
0 replies
 
kHarmaKillz
offline
Link
 
As the owner of EPICfail, I feel it is my duty to step foward and resolve this issue.

None of our build plans had ANYTHING about where a stat should be at a certain level. It was all theory before slow-building became big, but level was NEVER used as a guideline.

The arguement you fine gentlemen are thinking of was when the buffalo crew questioned that the builds we suggested were even possible to achieve. We assured them that they were, and Cali gave them a rough estimate as to when they could expect to hit the caps.. in seasons, not levels. The buffalo crew were boys in a man's world.. that is all that happened.

On a side note.. if the intelligence of a fanbase relates to the intelligence of a team and its players.. The Bills are in for a LONG couple seasons.
 
Jiddy78
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Chris Layne
As the owner of EPICfail, I feel it is my duty to step foward and resolve this issue.

None of our build plans had ANYTHING about where a stat should be at a certain level. It was all theory before slow-building became big, but level was NEVER used as a guideline.

The arguement you fine gentlemen are thinking of was when the buffalo crew questioned that the builds we suggested were even possible to achieve. We assured them that they were, and Cali gave them a rough estimate as to when they could expect to hit the caps.. in seasons, not levels. The buffalo crew were boys in a man's world.. that is all that happened.

On a side note.. if the intelligence of a fanbase relates to the intelligence of a team and its players.. The Bills are in for a LONG couple seasons.


Fakeassalo....but I agree that they are in for a LONG couple of seasons.........



........if they train carrying on their defenders....
 
Pariah
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Chris Layne
The buffalo crew were boys in a man's world.. that is all that happened..


So you come up here and talk trash about members of a team that was competitve in the WL, while you have no part of any WL teams, or any players worth crap.

Get some cred before you flap your gums about another team who is better than any team you are affiliated with.

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.