User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Why are USAPL teams doing worse in the WL than they have in previous seasons?
Page:
 
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ijg
You mean other than the degree I have in it? Worse try than your trollleader.

If you can't tell that a lvl 60 and a lvl 71 isn't as good as a 63 and 68 or a 65 and 66, then I guess I've overrated your knowledge of the game.


FYP

The Halifax Trollleaders, the best in GLB.

Here they come sporting the very busty Iceman, with curvilicious Feudel ..... and r87 the one with a FUPA! and omaigosh they got pom poms!
 
ddingo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology

1) The level advantage that USAPL enjoyed has worn off.

2) Several USAPL teams "colluded" to make two super-teams in Lincoln and the Blaze, both of which are doing very well...but at the expense of having 3-4 other teams that are very good.


That's about it.


Lincoln's "merger" last season was simply an attempt to bolster our roster AND provide some high-quality USAPL Season 1 studs with a chance for a WL season of glory. Only 3 of the merged players are still on the roster this season.
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
FYP

The Halifax Trollleaders, the best in GLB.

Here they come sporting the very busty Iceman, with curvilicious Feudel ..... and r87 the one with a FUPA! and omaigosh they got pom poms!


Epic
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ddingo
Lincoln's "merger" last season was simply an attempt to bolster our roster AND provide some high-quality USAPL Season 1 studs with a chance for a WL season of glory. Only 3 of the merged players are still on the roster this season.


word..and all 3 are hazy's dots.
 
thehazyone
NFL Replacement Refs SUCK
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
word..and all 3 are hazy's dots.


lol decline, all 3 are still performing pretty well.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by shull
I think there's been an increase in parity across the leagues as a result of teams looking for the path of least resistance to the world leagues, as opposed to trying to run up the USA ladder where you'll find level 70's at the AA level. In an attempt to win USA dottrophies, teams peak early playing there, so when they finally hit their stride and win USA they start the decline, leaving teams like Valhalla to compete for multiple seasons at the WL level.


statuswhore
 
r87
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ijg
Originally posted by Gart888

Originally posted by ijg


Originally posted by r87



Originally posted by ijg




Originally posted by Gart888





My guess is that their level advantage has worn off, and now everyone is on an even playing field.


dunno, Hounds are doing OK and we're maybe the most underleveled team in WL.


Median Level of 55 players is 68; mean is 66.2


Valhalla: Median Level of 55 players is 66; mean is 66

fix ur builds


nice try, but we're carrying around 20 lvl 60s. I'm guessing there's not anyone else with as many as 5 other than maybe Shockers.


you uhhhhh, don't understand statistics, do you?


You mean other than the degree I have in it?
Worse try than your cheerleader.

If you can't tell that a lvl 60 and a lvl 71 isn't as good as a 63 and 68 or a 65 and 66, then I guess I've overrated your knowledge of the game.


ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa


ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Edited by r87 on Dec 29, 2009 16:17:08
 
r87
offline
Link
 
I'm still not sure how a level 71 is worse than a level 66, but I am confident someone will enlighten me.
 
r87
offline
Link
 
Nashville has 33 players over level 67. Valhalla has 14.
 
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by r87
Nashville has 33 players over level 67. Valhalla has 14.


To be fair he did say "maybe", and they probably are in the bottom 25% of the WL with lvls.
Edited by Phil Jackson on Dec 29, 2009 16:31:43
 
r87
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by r87

Nashville has 33 players over level 67. Valhalla has 14.


To be fair he did say "maybe", and they probably are in the bottom 25% of the WL with lvls.


No doubt they are. Valhalla is the only one lower (by .2) as far as I can tell.
 
ijg
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by r87
I'm still not sure how a level 71 is worse than a level 66, but I am confident someone will enlighten me.


because you can't read. I said lvl 60 + lvl 71 < lvl 65 + lvl 66. Do you really not understand why?

Oh, maybe you don't looking at your player list.
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
So who's winning this pissing contest?
 
cowtesticles2001
udder pressure
offline
Link
 
CPL always wins...
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by cowtesticles2001
CPL always wins...


at least that's what they say..over..and over...and over and over again.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.