Read: We shit on every other conference because we send 8 teams to the tourney every year.
Forum > Pro Leagues > Global rankings (with matricies)
maizenhops
offline
offline
Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by kalkmanc
I don't understand conference pride in GLB..or in real life for that matter..all it is is teams feeding off of one or two teams success to brag because their team isn't good enough...and the funny thing is that one good team in WL is Haliblack...and without an APL team(LOL), they would have 0 WL trophies..
wait...
are you saying that a gutted team made hali win the WL?
sigh
Originally posted by kalkmanc
I don't understand conference pride in GLB..or in real life for that matter..all it is is teams feeding off of one or two teams success to brag because their team isn't good enough...and the funny thing is that one good team in WL is Haliblack...and without an APL team(LOL), they would have 0 WL trophies..
wait...
are you saying that a gutted team made hali win the WL?
sigh
NiborRis
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rot
What ever happened to those massive spreadsheets that spit out global rankings across all of the pro leagues, adding in scrims to make it more accurate? Would something like that get too thrown out of a whack by the WL?
If not, whoever did it should dust off the spreadsheet and see what it says next season. I'm in an lolargument on another website and I would like statistical evidence to belittle APL and back up my claims
Yeah I made the charts, was pretty out of it during thanksgiving holidays (Man I love me some vacation).
I've mentioned in various places before, but basically - if someone wants to make the game result data available, I can run the numbers again pretty easily. Unfortunately it's not a spreadsheet (and god knows I have no clue how to turn it into one), it's a program written in Perl to run on my AIX workstation, so it's not the most portable or user friendly hunk of code. But I'm happy to run the numbers again. In theory the existence of the WL shouldn't hurt things at all, as long as there are enough srsscrms to throw in the mix. Anyone running the game data could of course decide on whatever criteria to use in including games.
Easiest would be a spreadsheet or perhaps just a text file with three columns
Winning Team
Losing Team
Result (only important when there's a tie) - I need some way to mark that a game was a tie instead of the winning team winning.
From there it's not too bad to create the rankings.
What ever happened to those massive spreadsheets that spit out global rankings across all of the pro leagues, adding in scrims to make it more accurate? Would something like that get too thrown out of a whack by the WL?
If not, whoever did it should dust off the spreadsheet and see what it says next season. I'm in an lolargument on another website and I would like statistical evidence to belittle APL and back up my claims
Yeah I made the charts, was pretty out of it during thanksgiving holidays (Man I love me some vacation).
I've mentioned in various places before, but basically - if someone wants to make the game result data available, I can run the numbers again pretty easily. Unfortunately it's not a spreadsheet (and god knows I have no clue how to turn it into one), it's a program written in Perl to run on my AIX workstation, so it's not the most portable or user friendly hunk of code. But I'm happy to run the numbers again. In theory the existence of the WL shouldn't hurt things at all, as long as there are enough srsscrms to throw in the mix. Anyone running the game data could of course decide on whatever criteria to use in including games.
Easiest would be a spreadsheet or perhaps just a text file with three columns
Winning Team
Losing Team
Result (only important when there's a tie) - I need some way to mark that a game was a tie instead of the winning team winning.
From there it's not too bad to create the rankings.
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
but gart told me that jedi couldnt carry dooley's jock.
told me that in confidence, though, so dont tell anyone.
wtf, yo?
but gart told me that jedi couldnt carry dooley's jock.
told me that in confidence, though, so dont tell anyone.
wtf, yo?
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
but gart told me that jedi couldnt carry dooley's jock.
told me that in confidence, though, so dont tell anyone.
That comment was not metaphorical. Gart was merely confessing that Dooley stuffs his jock with a depleted uranium codpiece.
but gart told me that jedi couldnt carry dooley's jock.
told me that in confidence, though, so dont tell anyone.
That comment was not metaphorical. Gart was merely confessing that Dooley stuffs his jock with a depleted uranium codpiece.
NiborRis
offline
offline
Originally posted by Feudel
doesn't really matter since all teams are inferior to Haliblack
The computer isn't weighted to decide certain games (WL championship) are worth more than other games (lolregularseason). Haliblack might not come up 1st.
doesn't really matter since all teams are inferior to Haliblack
The computer isn't weighted to decide certain games (WL championship) are worth more than other games (lolregularseason). Haliblack might not come up 1st.
r87
offline
offline
Originally posted by NiborRis
Originally posted by Feudel
doesn't really matter since all teams are inferior to Haliblack
The computer isn't weighted to decide certain games (WL championship) are worth more than other games (lolregularseason). Haliblack might not come up 1st.
Computer's wrong tbh
Originally posted by Feudel
doesn't really matter since all teams are inferior to Haliblack
The computer isn't weighted to decide certain games (WL championship) are worth more than other games (lolregularseason). Haliblack might not come up 1st.
Computer's wrong tbh
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
