my edit to OTR was flawless...
Forum > Champion League > Through 7 Weeks: Huskers Rankings
GMathiasf
offline
offline
Originally posted by jktooley
my edit to OTR was flawless...
this guy really craves attention
my edit to OTR was flawless...
this guy really craves attention
jktooley
offline
offline
Originally posted by GMathiasf
this guy really craves attention
my heart flutters every time you mention me... you fuel me.
this guy really craves attention
my heart flutters every time you mention me... you fuel me.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
GP1
offline
offline
It was a regular season game. MEM didnt game plan. You obviously cant use that as a justification for being ranked higher than them.
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
Put Hali at #3.
1 & 2 whipped 3 who whipped 4.
Pretty clear.
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
Put Hali at #3.
1 & 2 whipped 3 who whipped 4.
Pretty clear.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by kurieg
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
Put Hali at #3.
1 & 2 whipped 3 who whipped 4.
Pretty clear.
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by GMathiasf
Overall very nicely done Husker. Though I would disagree with a couple here or there, that's pretty close to my thinking. The only one that makes little sense to me is having MEM over Hali. Seems like a pretty clear cut case there between those two teams.
Even this guy knows how ridiculous that is.
6-1 vs. 5-2
Put Hali at #3.
1 & 2 whipped 3 who whipped 4.
Pretty clear.
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Edited by jrry32 on Oct 27, 2009 13:26:13
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Strawman argument. Bonn/Manus is confused due to other games.
Nothing confusing about Hali/MEM.
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Strawman argument. Bonn/Manus is confused due to other games.
Nothing confusing about Hali/MEM.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
league records puts them both at 5-1 with Hali beating the snot out of MEM tho. 0_o
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
league records puts them both at 5-1 with Hali beating the snot out of MEM tho. 0_o
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by kurieg
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Strawman argument. Bonn/Manus is confused due to other games.
Nothing confusing about Hali/MEM.
No, it's easy better record means higher ranking. H2H only comes into place during ties.
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
Strawman argument. Bonn/Manus is confused due to other games.
Nothing confusing about Hali/MEM.
No, it's easy better record means higher ranking. H2H only comes into place during ties.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
league records puts them both at 5-1 with Hali beating the snot out of MEM tho. o_O
This isn't college though, league records don't have more bearing than actual records.
Originally posted by jrry32
6-1 vs. 5-2
If you want to go just on H2H then Manus over Bonn but Manus lost to Ragin so they have to be below them but Bonn beat Ragin so they have to be above them...you can't just disregard records and go to H2H...if you have a tied record, then you use H2H if possible. So 6-1 over 5-2.
league records puts them both at 5-1 with Hali beating the snot out of MEM tho. o_O
This isn't college though, league records don't have more bearing than actual records.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Doesn't really matter because these rankings aren't Kurieg's opinion or Bhall's opinion, they are Husker's.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
This isn't college though, league records don't have more bearing than actual records.
it shouldnt matter if you opened season play with an 0-16 caliber team or a 16-0 caliber team? Not that the case was that significant. But playing Over the Rhine in week 1 obviously played more into MEM's hands than playing NJB. Ya, this isn't college, but its legitimate facts really.
This isn't college though, league records don't have more bearing than actual records.
it shouldnt matter if you opened season play with an 0-16 caliber team or a 16-0 caliber team? Not that the case was that significant. But playing Over the Rhine in week 1 obviously played more into MEM's hands than playing NJB. Ya, this isn't college, but its legitimate facts really.
creeker22
offline
offline
Why does it matter who is higher in an opinionated ranking? Both are definitely going to be in the playoffs and you guys can settle it then
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by creeker22
Why does it matter who is higher in an opinionated ranking? Both are definitely going to be in the playoffs and you guys can settle it then
It shall be settled...
Why does it matter who is higher in an opinionated ranking? Both are definitely going to be in the playoffs and you guys can settle it then
It shall be settled...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
