Warrior General Games

Honestly, I would rather play one of the top 3 leagues, but I think we need to wake some people up and remind them this isn't Season 5.

Originally posted by buffalobills_tw
Originally posted by nthomas


EEPL has 26 teams ready to go, and we can play after we are done with SEAPL around day 15-20. But having 7 or 8 teams step up from a league of 32 isn't going to cut it.


You guys are playing SEAPL? Then if you can't win against them, I guess we will find a better league to play since we already beat SEAPL last season.


And we beat OPL last season. Using last season's challenges to judge this season's results is as useless as tits on a bull. Season 9 results mean nothing in season 10, with the new sim, player movements, etc.

Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by buffalobills_tw

Originally posted by nthomas



EEPL has 26 teams ready to go, and we can play after we are done with SEAPL around day 15-20. But having 7 or 8 teams step up from a league of 32 isn't going to cut it.


You guys are playing SEAPL? Then if you can't win against them, I guess we will find a better league to play since we already beat SEAPL last season.


And we beat OPL last season. Using last season's challenges to judge this season's results is as useless as tits on a bull. Season 9 results mean nothing in season 10, with the new sim, player movements, etc.

That's funny. You guys obviously forget about new sim and player movements when ranking APL like it's season 3.

BCP will take on whomever is the lowest leveled team in EE Pro...

Edit: In fact, we'll take on any team that has about 6/7 levels on us or fewer. But we won't waste our time playing a team of level 60s.

Nairobi will participate. Count us in.

Well this http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=408&team2=2778 happens in 16 hrs...sucks there 0-3, but we will see how good an EEPL team is...

Edit- If they beat SEAPL, Seychelles is down for sure

Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by Hokiemon

Long story short, I posted what I felt were the League rankings (PRO leagues) in the PWT rankings forum. After seeing so many idiots with APL at 8th (last place), I posted mine with APL at 4th, behind USAPL, CPL, and SAPL.

So now it's started. I got a PM from EEPL, and it seems those scrubs want to challenge us to shut me up (go figure huh)

Are there any teams interested in playing an APL vs. EEPL challenge?

EEPL has 26 teams that are ready to play any league who can step up. They are teams from top to bottom, and we played SLAP and OPL last season, and are set to play SEAPL next week. Not sure how active APL is, but rumor is that you have been able to get only 10-12 teams to do things like this in the past. No offense, but that is pretty weak. With 32 teams in the league, even with some gut jobs, your league still should be able to produce 26 teams to play a single game.

It would help with planning this thing if you could list the 26 teams from EEPL that have committed to play. Since it has been implied that the top teams from each will play each other, it will help with scheduling match ups as the games draw closer. I am sure you wouldn't want to see a 10-0 team playing a 3-7 team or vice-versa if it can be avoided.

Just a thought.

Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by SuperHawks

EEPL, aren't they the worst Pro league in all of GLB?

Stallions want to get in on some of this fun...

Funny, that is what the EEPL guys said about APL. I heard (these are quotes):

"Aren't they the worst Pro league ever"

"I would rather play one of the AAA leagues"

"Africa has a pro league????"

"That is the most inactive league in all of GLB. There is no f'in way that 26 teams from that minor league will step up"

EEPL has 26 teams ready to go, and we can play after we are done with SEAPL around day 15-20. But having 7 or 8 teams step up from a league of 32 isn't going to cut it.


Where? I see 0 threads. Don't be making up stuff now.lol

Ghana is in, as long as we can play someone who sucks.

Originally posted by Lensar

Ghana is in, as long as we can play someone who sucks.

That would be most of the teams in EEPL. lol

ABD will be in, although I am very frustrated so far, we will not let APL down...Count us in.
Vegas

Originally posted by SheVegas
ABD will be in, although I am very frustrated so far, we will not let APL down...Count us in.
Vegas

That's what I like to hear. How many is that now?

Seychelles
LOL
Dar es
DD
ABD
Ghana
Nairobi
BCP
Stallions
Pirates
GRitS
RRK
Warlords
Pangani Peckerwoods
Mogadishu Malice
Angola Spider Monkeys

That's 13. We're halfway there.

Originally posted by kondor
Originally posted by nthomas

Originally posted by Hokiemon


Long story short, I posted what I felt were the League rankings (PRO leagues) in the PWT rankings forum. After seeing so many idiots with APL at 8th (last place), I posted mine with APL at 4th, behind USAPL, CPL, and SAPL.

So now it's started. I got a PM from EEPL, and it seems those scrubs want to challenge us to shut me up (go figure huh)

Are there any teams interested in playing an APL vs. EEPL challenge?

EEPL has 26 teams that are ready to play any league who can step up. They are teams from top to bottom, and we played SLAP and OPL last season, and are set to play SEAPL next week. Not sure how active APL is, but rumor is that you have been able to get only 10-12 teams to do things like this in the past. No offense, but that is pretty weak. With 32 teams in the league, even with some gut jobs, your league still should be able to produce 26 teams to play a single game.

It would help with planning this thing if you could list the 26 teams from EEPL that have committed to play. Since it has been implied that the top teams from each will play each other, it will help with scheduling match ups as the games draw closer. I am sure you wouldn't want to see a 10-0 team playing a 3-7 team or vice-versa if it can be avoided.

Just a thought.


Fair enough. We have a private league forum, and there is also a private forum just for the EEPL challenges, with every team owner or a representative GM to talk about matchups once we get the teams aligned. Getting teams evenly ranked (at least in their respective leagues) usually makes for the best matchups, since it compares all levels of the league.

Here are the 26 teams that will be playing SEAPL and hopefully APL (in no particular order except order of sign-up):

1. Buda Pests
2. Vaadwaur Phoenix
3. Warsaw Warriors
4. Estonian Wife Carriers
5. Dallas Smoke stacks
6. Minsk Ninjas
7. Stewart Ballers
8. Sofia Spiders
9. Stuttgart Blitzkrieg
10. Emmaus Fighting Green Hornets
11. Budapest Tigers
12. Hellas Hoplites
13. Warsaw Wrath
14. The Wheatfield
15. C-Town Hoodlums
16. Russian Revolution
17. Stalingrad Gryphon Army
18. D.C. Redskins
19. Chicago Midway Monsters
20. Arkadak Arsenal
21. Minoan Minotaurs
22. Vladivostok Voodoo
23. Budapest Devils
24. Alexandrovsk Conquerors
25. Lafayette Ragin Cajuns
26. The Cape Town Cubicles

Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by kondor

Originally posted by nthomas


Originally posted by Hokiemon



Long story short, I posted what I felt were the League rankings (PRO leagues) in the PWT rankings forum. After seeing so many idiots with APL at 8th (last place), I posted mine with APL at 4th, behind USAPL, CPL, and SAPL.

So now it's started. I got a PM from EEPL, and it seems those scrubs want to challenge us to shut me up (go figure huh)

Are there any teams interested in playing an APL vs. EEPL challenge?

EEPL has 26 teams that are ready to play any league who can step up. They are teams from top to bottom, and we played SLAP and OPL last season, and are set to play SEAPL next week. Not sure how active APL is, but rumor is that you have been able to get only 10-12 teams to do things like this in the past. No offense, but that is pretty weak. With 32 teams in the league, even with some gut jobs, your league still should be able to produce 26 teams to play a single game.

It would help with planning this thing if you could list the 26 teams from EEPL that have committed to play. Since it has been implied that the top teams from each will play each other, it will help with scheduling match ups as the games draw closer. I am sure you wouldn't want to see a 10-0 team playing a 3-7 team or vice-versa if it can be avoided.

Just a thought.


Fair enough. We have a private league forum, and there is also a private forum just for the EEPL challenges, with every team owner or a representative GM to talk about matchups once we get the teams aligned. Getting teams evenly ranked (at least in their respective leagues) usually makes for the best matchups, since it compares all levels of the league.

Here are the 26 teams that will be playing SEAPL and hopefully APL (in no particular order except order of sign-up):

1. Buda Pests
2. Vaadwaur Phoenix
3. Warsaw Warriors
4. Estonian Wife Carriers
5. Dallas Smoke stacks
6. Minsk Ninjas
7. Stewart Ballers
8. Sofia Spiders
9. Stuttgart Blitzkrieg
10. Emmaus Fighting Green Hornets
11. Budapest Tigers
12. Hellas Hoplites
13. Warsaw Wrath
14. The Wheatfield
15. C-Town Hoodlums
16. Russian Revolution
17. Stalingrad Gryphon Army
18. D.C. Redskins
19. Chicago Midway Monsters
20. Arkadak Arsenal
21. Minoan Minotaurs
22. Vladivostok Voodoo
23. Budapest Devils
24. Alexandrovsk Conquerors
25. Lafayette Ragin Cajuns
26. The Cape Town Cubicles


No disrespect, and I am not talking for APL, I represent the ABD only....But you truly have some shit ass names for your teams in your league.......Dallas, DC, Chicago...Is this the NFC or EEPL??????