msupoke
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ratphlegm
Originally posted by BDizzle80
Originally posted by msupoke
Originally posted by soapbox
Originally posted by NDepth
Or as fast as a bead of sweat runs from a fat girls neck to her cankles.
I don't know if you understand it, but actually the increased surface area by all of the fat would make the bead of sweat travel more slowly than the same sweat on a skinnier person.
Actually, the sweat would travel at the same rate of speed, but it would take longer due to the increased distance, assuming that the fat girl and skinny girl are the same height.
This.
You fail at physics, soapbox.
Wrong. A fat girl's fat creates a cottage cheese effect which increases drag, and pooling as the bead rolls, reducing bead mass and weight, meaning hydrogen bonds would reduce its speed to a greater effect.
Someone find Warren Buffet, he can confirm this.
I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion.
Originally posted by BDizzle80
Originally posted by msupoke
Originally posted by soapbox
Originally posted by NDepth
Or as fast as a bead of sweat runs from a fat girls neck to her cankles.
I don't know if you understand it, but actually the increased surface area by all of the fat would make the bead of sweat travel more slowly than the same sweat on a skinnier person.
Actually, the sweat would travel at the same rate of speed, but it would take longer due to the increased distance, assuming that the fat girl and skinny girl are the same height.
This.
You fail at physics, soapbox.
Wrong. A fat girl's fat creates a cottage cheese effect which increases drag, and pooling as the bead rolls, reducing bead mass and weight, meaning hydrogen bonds would reduce its speed to a greater effect.
Someone find Warren Buffet, he can confirm this.
I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion.
soapbox
offline
offline
Meh, I meant it'd take longer, not travel at a slower speed. If you read the first part of my post, you'll see that I just misworded the end.
msupoke
offline
offline
Originally posted by soapbox
Meh, I meant it'd take longer, not travel at a slower speed. If you read the first part of my post, you'll see that I just misworded the end.
I am illiterate.
Meh, I meant it'd take longer, not travel at a slower speed. If you read the first part of my post, you'll see that I just misworded the end.
I am illiterate.
Bigmoneydave
offline
offline
We all know fat chicks be greezy. Therefore a smoother surface. Oil and water don't mix.
nathbear
offline
offline
Originally posted by gameface25
Originally posted by nathbear
Originally posted by gameface25
Originally posted by nathbear
Except when you lost to the Baggies last season before we'd even recruited a single player, right?
cuz post-season scrims are SRS BIZNUSS amirite?
And using that as an excuse for sucking crap seems to be the typical response from you guys, it seems. How about you beat someone half decent then come and see me? Oh wait, that's right. You can't.
Enjoy another season of mediocrity!
"another" would imply it has happened before...
checking, um.... nope
and a "typical response" would also imply it has happened before, care to elaborate or point it out? DO you just open your mouth and nonsense rolls out? rare talent on GLB.....
You talk smack about as well as my 15 month old
Im sorry that you are able to "get off" from beating a team in a post season scrim, after we were upset in playoffs and didnt even view tactics, let along set them, scout etc. But hey, if you did and it makes you happy in your pants for a meaningless "W", kudos to you bro!
DO WORK!
Excuses again? You lost, get over it. You're just coming across as pathetic now, I'm afraid. Much like your team.
Originally posted by nathbear
Originally posted by gameface25
Originally posted by nathbear
Except when you lost to the Baggies last season before we'd even recruited a single player, right?
cuz post-season scrims are SRS BIZNUSS amirite?
And using that as an excuse for sucking crap seems to be the typical response from you guys, it seems. How about you beat someone half decent then come and see me? Oh wait, that's right. You can't.
Enjoy another season of mediocrity!
"another" would imply it has happened before...
checking, um.... nope
and a "typical response" would also imply it has happened before, care to elaborate or point it out? DO you just open your mouth and nonsense rolls out? rare talent on GLB.....
You talk smack about as well as my 15 month old
Im sorry that you are able to "get off" from beating a team in a post season scrim, after we were upset in playoffs and didnt even view tactics, let along set them, scout etc. But hey, if you did and it makes you happy in your pants for a meaningless "W", kudos to you bro!
DO WORK!
Excuses again? You lost, get over it. You're just coming across as pathetic now, I'm afraid. Much like your team.
JBennett23
offline
offline
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
mateinone
offline
offline
geez this goes down as one of the stranger threads.... good luck with it all.
Amazing what an off-season can produce
Amazing what an off-season can produce
msupoke
offline
offline
Originally posted by JBennett23
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
Ratphlegm
offline
offline
The sweat bead discussion has been a clearly sarcastic detour from an already retarded thread.
msupoke
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ratphlegm
The sweat bead discussion has been a clearly sarcastic detour from an already retarded thread.
Sarcasm is apparently lost on some.
The sweat bead discussion has been a clearly sarcastic detour from an already retarded thread.
Sarcasm is apparently lost on some.
The Tempest
offline
offline
Originally posted by msupoke
That has never happened before. Elephant has always been stronger.
Are you being sarcastic or do you honestly believe that????
That has never happened before. Elephant has always been stronger.
Are you being sarcastic or do you honestly believe that????
JBennett23
offline
offline
Originally posted by msupoke
Originally posted by JBennett23
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
"""I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion."""
You're claiming this isn't an algebraic equation? You need to brush up on your basic algebra if that's the case.
Originally posted by JBennett23
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
"""I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion."""
You're claiming this isn't an algebraic equation? You need to brush up on your basic algebra if that's the case.
msupoke
offline
offline
Originally posted by JBennett23
Originally posted by msupoke
Originally posted by JBennett23
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
"""I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion."""
You're claiming this isn't an algebraic equation? You need to brush up on your basic algebra if that's the case.
I am definitely claiming it is not an algebraic equation. I think that my use of the term 'variables' is throwing you off. Variables exist in many disciplines outside of algebra or even mathematics. Just because you could make an algebraic equation out of this discussion does not mean that it is algebra. Using your logic, we could say that the above passage is physics, chemistry, biology, etc.
Just out of curiosity, could you please explain why you do think this is algebra?
Originally posted by msupoke
Originally posted by JBennett23
The fact that you are making algebraic equations to represent whose skin is healthier between a fat chick and a skinny chick is 100% absolutely retarded.
If anyone used algebra in this thread, you would have a point.
"""I contemplated noting this effect in my previous post, but I was eliminating all unstated variables such as height, drag, etc. You are correct in that the surface tension would increase drag and slow the sweat droplet considerably. However, without specifying a direct variable, you cannot safely assume that the skinny girl has perfect skin. In fact, her physique may be a result of methamphetamine-usage, which would create lesions and scabs, thereby creating more drag than cottage cheese would. Also, skinny chicks can have plenty of cottage cheese.
Another consideration we have failed to mention is the position that you have the girl in. If you have the fat girl bent over and touching her toes, the sweat could simply drop from her neck straight to her cankles. If you have the skinny girl in some positions, it is more likely that her sweat would hit your ankles before it hits hers. I would need more information before I could safely come to a conclusion."""
You're claiming this isn't an algebraic equation? You need to brush up on your basic algebra if that's the case.
I am definitely claiming it is not an algebraic equation. I think that my use of the term 'variables' is throwing you off. Variables exist in many disciplines outside of algebra or even mathematics. Just because you could make an algebraic equation out of this discussion does not mean that it is algebra. Using your logic, we could say that the above passage is physics, chemistry, biology, etc.
Just out of curiosity, could you please explain why you do think this is algebra?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
