I think it's a great idea.
Forum > Announcements > Team Waiting List
jrweeks1
offline
offline
Thanks for limiting the number of teams and processing them into the league at a reasonable rate. Roster minimums are good especially with the new salary minimums. That is as close to parity as I think we should get.
Originally posted by danpenc918
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
Last edited May 17, 2008 12:02:29
Originally posted by adamcohen1
What day is it probably going to come out? Ballpark.
When it's done
What day is it probably going to come out? Ballpark.
When it's done
Quadri Space
offline
offline
"sign up date" = the day you signed the i want a team list OR the day you created a GLB account? Thanks.
Originally posted by Quadri Space
"sign up date" = the day you signed the i want a team list OR the day you created a GLB account? Thanks.
account create date (updated OP)
"sign up date" = the day you signed the i want a team list OR the day you created a GLB account? Thanks.
account create date (updated OP)
buffalobills_tw
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
- The only exception to the resale is for inactive owners. We will still give an active GM the option of taking over the team, to encourage continuity on the team. If they don't want it, though, it goes to the top person on the wait list.
If a owner doesn't plan to renew his ownership, is it possible to let the current members in the team, like GM, take over the team?
- The only exception to the resale is for inactive owners. We will still give an active GM the option of taking over the team, to encourage continuity on the team. If they don't want it, though, it goes to the top person on the wait list.
If a owner doesn't plan to renew his ownership, is it possible to let the current members in the team, like GM, take over the team?
AC33
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by adamcohen1
What day is it probably going to come out? Ballpark.
When it's done
K
Originally posted by adamcohen1
What day is it probably going to come out? Ballpark.
When it's done
K
Laggo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
- When we add new teams for this off-season, they will be added as CPU-only leagues. We will then release them to new owners over time, throughout the season, following the same rules as above. This will allow the teams to have a full 16-game schedule, but also allow us to control the team market a little better.
Does this mean that some owners in a new league wont get access to their teams until a few games into the season, putting them at a disadvantage?
Or does it mean that entire leagues will be released one at a time.
- When we add new teams for this off-season, they will be added as CPU-only leagues. We will then release them to new owners over time, throughout the season, following the same rules as above. This will allow the teams to have a full 16-game schedule, but also allow us to control the team market a little better.
Does this mean that some owners in a new league wont get access to their teams until a few games into the season, putting them at a disadvantage?
Or does it mean that entire leagues will be released one at a time.
xfrozenxsoulsx
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by danpenc918
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
Chemistry resets so that shouldn't be too big of a deal.
I do have a question. If the team is in bad debt, can that be fixed as well? I don't think players will want to get a team and it be in bad debt (-500,000 with a loan pending) with stadium upgrades. So if you can look into making sure teams aren't in debt, maybe even consider reseting money for players, that would be great too.
Originally posted by danpenc918
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
Chemistry resets so that shouldn't be too big of a deal.
I do have a question. If the team is in bad debt, can that be fixed as well? I don't think players will want to get a team and it be in bad debt (-500,000 with a loan pending) with stadium upgrades. So if you can look into making sure teams aren't in debt, maybe even consider reseting money for players, that would be great too.
danpenc918
offline
offline
Originally posted by xfrozenxsoulsx
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by danpenc918
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
Chemistry resets so that shouldn't be too big of a deal.
I do have a question. If the team is in bad debt, can that be fixed as well? I don't think players will want to get a team and it be in bad debt (-500,000 with a loan pending) with stadium upgrades. So if you can look into making sure teams aren't in debt, maybe even consider reseting money for players, that would be great too.
But .. should they get the stadium upgrade in addition to getting the money back? Or reset the stadium as well?
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by danpenc918
If a team were sold back and then offered to the first person in line, could they get a chance to review it and possibly turn it down without losing their place in line.
No. We want to streamline it. Having to wait for a bunch of people to accept/reject just takes too long, especially if it goes down the line...waiting 24-48 hours for every person. Teams are a very limited commodity; no chance to be choosy.
Chemistry resets so that shouldn't be too big of a deal.
I do have a question. If the team is in bad debt, can that be fixed as well? I don't think players will want to get a team and it be in bad debt (-500,000 with a loan pending) with stadium upgrades. So if you can look into making sure teams aren't in debt, maybe even consider reseting money for players, that would be great too.
But .. should they get the stadium upgrade in addition to getting the money back? Or reset the stadium as well?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
