Warrior General Games

Obviously my successes as an OC prove that I don't know what I'm doing....very good points there, a normal person would never have linked the two. It's obviously a testament to my inadequacies that we haven't scored fewer than 40 points since our loss to the Nightmare

You're so caught up into stats of individual players that you fail to realize one thing....IT DOESN'T MATTER AT ALL. Individual stats in this game have never mattered, if you haven't gathered this much by now then you're being pretty dense. Who cares if Sweed doesn't put up monster numbers week in and week out against the "good" teams? Do we always try to feature him and try to get him stats? Not in the least...it's all about the best gameplan for that game and if he benefits and performs, great, if not, it's all good as long as we get the win. Congrats, you've pointed out that he has a lot of stats against gutted teams...takes a genius to put that one together.

Originally posted by nfratami
Originally posted by blevstone

Also...our offense earlier in the year is nothing close to what our offense is right now. We're firing on all cylinders now and we don't even resemble the same team we were earlier. Continue to not know what you're talking about though...makes you look brilliant.

coming from the guy who is arguing a point that was never made

Actually....it's in response to your brilliant comments about our game against the Nightmare, so once again...genius.

Originally posted by nfratami
what does any of this matter, take out his obscene games against cupcakes and his numbers arent anywhere close to league leaders

the ARGUMENT WAS NEVER THAT he can't have a good game against a good team, it was that he is at the top because of 4 cupcakes, yet you guys cant argue against that point so you decide to manipulate the argument into something where you actually have a point

our ypc is irrelevant for two reasons

1. we only run in short yardage situations where the defenses are stacking the line (ie 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and shortt/goal line)

2. you have rush attempts against cupcakes raising your average

honestly throw around all the numbers you want about your "balanced" offense

balance this...

13-0

You cannot truly be insinuating that your running game is anywhere near the caliber of ours? Just because you CAN'T run consistently and only use it when you have to doesn't mean anything...and our running attack has been very successful against good and bad teams so it's hardly an argument in the least to point to our YPC being raised because of playing against gutted teams. In fact, Tyler Rose hasn't even had a single GAME this season where he averaged a YPC as low as your team does all the time. His worst ypc in a game this year is your starting RB's season long average....congrats on that. Congrats on being predictable too...if you guys went up against a DC who could gameplan properly, you would have been shut down long before now.

Great argument on the record....since we play so many of the same teams it's an obviously equal barometer....brilliant yet again. That 1 game better on the record means so much when we play just 2 of the same teams all season long....one of them gutted before we got to play them but we beat the other worse than you beat them so take that for what it is.

Fuck now that blevstone is posting I am worried Nfrat!!!!

We need to figure out what the fuck we are doing 13-0 was all luck, lets just try to lose these next 3 by less than 100.

from nfratami,

If we wanted to we could have one of the best rushing games, history speaks for itself, any season we haven't gone 100% pass our HBs have received trophies (D3, Ricky Jordan). Just because a team chooses to only run to get short first downs and touchdowns doesn't mean that they aren't capable.

It actually is a great argument on the record, you aren't undefeated in a conference where your 2nd place team loses to our 6th place team.

(Some shit mod banned him for 1 bay after he just got off for 7...)

from nfratami,

also to your point about individual stats not mattering, i agree, but this was actually a role playing press release, and obviously for fun to get a response out of a player who talks in character

you and your crew of flunkies came in all freaked out and i responded, since individual stats dont matter and i am banned and it is annoying to post like this i will leave you with the winning argument

13-0 in a stronger conference vs 12-1 in a weaker conference

GG

well for what its worth I enjoyed this RP post. I'd love to see more stuff like this done and when responding people should respond correctly, meaning RP that shit!

Originally posted by Cerneo
from nfratami,

also to your point about individual stats not mattering, i agree, but this was actually a role playing press release, and obviously for fun to get a response out of a player who talks in character

you and your crew of flunkies came in all freaked out and i responded, since individual stats dont matter and i am banned and it is annoying to post like this i will leave you with the winning argument

13-0 in a stronger conference vs 12-1 in a weaker conference

GG

Believe what you want right up until we beat you when we play you...because 1 loss will matter so much then.

Oh, and Cerneo....you suck at sarcasm. Just saying.

Originally posted by blevstone
Oh, and Cerneo....you suck at sarcasm. Just saying.

Cool, by the way you suck.

Let's ignore those cupcake games, because those mean nothing. Let's look at games that make more sense.




here's all games with a scoring margin under 100:

Limas Limas Sweed: 4 rpg, 56.3 ypg, 14.08 ypr, 8 TDs

Gerald Catcher: 6.75 rpg per game, 99 ypg, 14.67 ypr, 8 TDs

Jamal Lincoln: 6.42 rpg, 75.14 ypg, 11.68 yards ypr, 16 TDs

Xavier Hands: 5.3 rpg, 83.83 ypg, 15.72 ypr, 9 TDs




Oh, and by the way, Limas Limas Sweed gets 64 plays per game versus Lincoln's 54, Hands' 56, and Catcher's 48.




Oh, but that's not all. What about just close games where stud receivers are supposed to stand out? You know, where they earn their fame and notoriety?





close games in depth: games within 21 points in the 4th quarter

Limas Limas Sweed: 2.4 receptions per game, 20.2 ypg, 8.42 ypr, 52% catch rate, 47% PD rate, 2 TDs

Gerald Catcher: 5.9 receptions per game, 66.29 ypg, 11.13 ypr, 65% catch rate, 30% PD rate, 0 TDs

Jamal Lincoln: 6.42 repections per game, 75.14 ypg, 11.68 ypr, 45% catch rate, 55% PD rate, 7 TDs

Xavier Hands: 4.42 receptions per game, 60.29 ypg, 13.6ypr, 51% catch rate, 34% PD rate, 1 TD


QED

Fucking destroyed.

Yea....aren't you a genius...let's compare receivers for a team that passes ALL THE TIME to a team that only passes a lot on occasion. Makes perfect sense. Man...you guys are good at this stuff.

LOL were comparing passing stats from a team that runs first to a team that pass first. BRILLIANT!

Originally posted by bubbajwp
LOL were comparing passing stats from a team that runs first to a team that pass first. BRILLIANT!

so he shows up in big games even though he doesn't get thrown at?

You can't have both arguments when they contradict, sir.

I'll simplify it

We usually use a run heavy offense = Limas not good stats

We switch up our ai to a pass heavy offense = Limas has good stats

The games I have already provided in this thread are the evidence. Easy enough

Originally posted by bubbajwp
I'll simplify it

We usually use a run heavy offense = Limas not good stats

We switch up our ai to a pass heavy offense = Limas has good stats

The games I have already provided in this thread are the evidence. Easy enough

So why should LLS get the trophy if you only stat-pad him vs CPU teams?

LLS: 9 games vs non-CPU

36 rec, 506 yards. Extrapolate that for a 13 game season so far...

52 rec, 731 yards.


Why should LLS get recognized for his play against CPU teams? Those numbers are not bad, but they're not anything to write home about.

The issue really isn't whether LLS is the better receiver, it's that he's stealing a trophy from a far more worthy one...or two....or three.