Warrior General Games

Originally posted by RobertRJS
1.5 yards difference on a small sampling. kinda silly argument there.

Second of all, GLB isn't the NFL. One WR isn't targeted more than another. The dots don't magically fear team X's stud WR anymore than it fears team X's 6th string WR.

What prevents Jamal from getting more looks his way is that the other two WRs, and TEs even, are good enough that the RNG will swing their way a lot as well.

So a single drop by Bennett and a broken tackle by Lincoln on this "small sampling" mean something but more receiving yards and a higher average is a "silly argument"?

As for the second part I was referring to game planning. If Bennett plays with "nobodies" ( which couldn't be farther from the truth) wouldn't opposing teams focus the gameplan towards stopping Bennett?

In the end I could really care less about who's dot is better when most likely the two builds are nearly identical anyways. I just felt like ruffling some feathers tonight and knew nfrat and his crew would go crazy over anyone saying their player is better.

Originally posted by RobertRJS
Jamal was targeted less even though his QB threw a lot more. Why? Cuz not only does Jamal have to pwn the CBs/safeties, but he's gotta outperform his fellow stud receivers.

A tough task indeed, yet he excels.

Jamal > Tristan

Well if that's the case our 5th receiver>Jamal. He may not have better stats but that's only because he has to share passes with four other stud receivers on the Raiders. If it wasn't for them he would easily have better numbers then Jamal.

Jamal vs Devils (one of the top two teams in AAA2)

/thread

Originally posted by cannons call
So a single drop by Bennett and a broken tackle by Lincoln on this "small sampling" mean something but more receiving yards and a higher average is a "silly argument"?

nah, just pointing out your blatant omission to prop up his stats,

Originally posted by
As for the second part I was referring to game planning. If Bennett plays with "nobodies" ( which couldn't be farther from the truth) wouldn't opposing teams focus the gameplan towards stopping Bennett?

You can't really gear GLB to just take out 1 WR

Originally posted by
In the end I could really care less about who's dot is better when most likely the two builds are nearly identical anyways. I just felt like ruffling some feathers tonight and knew nfrat and his crew would go crazy over anyone saying their player is better.

mhm

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by RobertRJS

Jamal was targeted less even though his QB threw a lot more. Why? Cuz not only does Jamal have to pwn the CBs/safeties, but he's gotta outperform his fellow stud receivers.

A tough task indeed, yet he excels.

Jamal > Tristan

Well if that's the case our 5th receiver>Jamal. He may not have better stats but that's only because he has to share passes with four other stud receivers on the Raiders. If it wasn't for them he would easily have better numbers then Jamal.


No, because that 5th stringer would fail as the WR1. Jamal plays alongside 2 other #1s. He's sacrificed for the good of the team, but trust me, he's the best WR and at the end of the day, it will be obvious to all.

Jamal = Randy Moss
Xavier = Steve Smith
Catcha = Wes Welker

imo

Xavier too tall to be Steve Smith. Andre johnson, imo. Otherwise, sounds correct!

Originally posted by RobertRJS
Originally posted by cannons call

So a single drop by Bennett and a broken tackle by Lincoln on this "small sampling" mean something but more receiving yards and a higher average is a "silly argument"?

nah, just pointing out your blatant omission to prop up his stats,

blatant omision? I got the stats from the gamelogs, show me where it lists broken tackles and drops. When's the last time you've seen espn list broken tackles and drops as a stat line? Probably never because they are pretty irrelevant unless a player has an assload of drops or broken tackles in a game.

Originally posted by RobertRJS
Originally posted by cannons call

As for the second part I was referring to game planning. If Bennett plays with "nobodies" ( which couldn't be farther from the truth) wouldn't opposing teams focus the gameplan towards stopping Bennett?

You can't really gear GLB to just take out 1 WR

you can't totally take them out of the game but you can certainly focus your defense towards one.

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by RobertRJS

Originally posted by cannons call


So a single drop by Bennett and a broken tackle by Lincoln on this "small sampling" mean something but more receiving yards and a higher average is a "silly argument"?

nah, just pointing out your blatant omission to prop up his stats,

blatant omision? I got the stats from the gamelogs, show me where it lists broken tackles and drops. When's the last time you've seen espn list broken tackles and drops as a stat line? Probably never because they are pretty irrelevant unless a player has an assload of drops or broken tackles in a game.

Originally posted by RobertRJS

Originally posted by cannons call


As for the second part I was referring to game planning. If Bennett plays with "nobodies" ( which couldn't be farther from the truth) wouldn't opposing teams focus the gameplan towards stopping Bennett?

You can't really gear GLB to just take out 1 WR

you can't totally take them out of the game but you can certainly focus your defense towards one.






cry moar please

anyways kids I must go to bed now. Work in the morning

I've got no dogs in this fight, but I've got to go Sweed, then Bennett. They're both unreal.

Originally posted by nfratami
Jamal = Randy Moss
Xavier = Steve Smith
Catcha = Wes Welker

imo

They're pretty lucky they never have to go against Vertigo in games, imo.

Originally posted by cannons call
damn I was hoping to get a response out of nfratami but he signed off



Don't worry he'll reply from his boyfriend's bedside using a Blackberry soon enough.

Oh man a gay joke. Does some one pay you to be that original?

Your mother does.