Originally posted by Madayew
see u next season
see u next season
Lout84
offline
offline
Berlin can not wait to play the Winemakers for the conference title game. It should be a good one.
goldielax25
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lout84
Berlin can not wait to play the Winemakers for the conference title game. It should be a good one.
that it will be, i think we'll play each other twice this season, the same as last season, cept so much more will be on the line this year
Berlin can not wait to play the Winemakers for the conference title game. It should be a good one.
that it will be, i think we'll play each other twice this season, the same as last season, cept so much more will be on the line this year
goldielax25
offline
offline
im gonna get to week 7 picks today, and probably do a power rankings tomorrow night after the games or friday after work.
JBennett23
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chefnastee
Originally posted by goldielax25
stockholm got out-gameplanned badly in that game
I'm going to have to disagree. The score was actually much closer than it should have been, and all 3 INT's on our part were uncharacteristic bad throws or went right through our WR's hands. Hesinki had no real answer for our running game and outside of one play, their offense was held in check. If I'm not mistaken, they averaged 450+ rushing ypg coming into this game. They were held to 100 tonight.
The guys on Stockholm that know Xelstyle had nothing but good words to say about him in our team forum, and I believe them....but I think our guys more than held their own tonight. GG Helsinki. May we meet again in the playoffs
This is pretty accurate. We lost our entire LB corps from last year, and as a result, it is our biggest weakness. However, we're working on gameplans that can compensate for that. He's also right about their defense... they did a great job containing the run while remaining stingy to the pass. They are a great team, and when we boost we'll meet them in the playoffs >: )
The exception is the interceptions, which were definitely characteristic of our pass D, which I consider to be one of our strong suits.
Originally posted by goldielax25
stockholm got out-gameplanned badly in that game
I'm going to have to disagree. The score was actually much closer than it should have been, and all 3 INT's on our part were uncharacteristic bad throws or went right through our WR's hands. Hesinki had no real answer for our running game and outside of one play, their offense was held in check. If I'm not mistaken, they averaged 450+ rushing ypg coming into this game. They were held to 100 tonight.
The guys on Stockholm that know Xelstyle had nothing but good words to say about him in our team forum, and I believe them....but I think our guys more than held their own tonight. GG Helsinki. May we meet again in the playoffs
This is pretty accurate. We lost our entire LB corps from last year, and as a result, it is our biggest weakness. However, we're working on gameplans that can compensate for that. He's also right about their defense... they did a great job containing the run while remaining stingy to the pass. They are a great team, and when we boost we'll meet them in the playoffs >: )
The exception is the interceptions, which were definitely characteristic of our pass D, which I consider to be one of our strong suits.
Last edited Jan 14, 2009 13:17:40
goldielax25
offline
offline
stockholm passed, and because they did the game was close. thats not a characteristic of good game planning, when you pass against an exceptional pass defense when you could run against an above-average one, with an exceptional running game. if stockholm stuck to the ground the game wouldnt have been close. i stand by the out-gameplanned statement.
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by JBennett23
Originally posted by Chefnastee
Originally posted by goldielax25
stockholm got out-gameplanned badly in that game
I'm going to have to disagree. The score was actually much closer than it should have been, and all 3 INT's on our part were uncharacteristic bad throws or went right through our WR's hands. Hesinki had no real answer for our running game and outside of one play, their offense was held in check. If I'm not mistaken, they averaged 450+ rushing ypg coming into this game. They were held to 100 tonight.
The guys on Stockholm that know Xelstyle had nothing but good words to say about him in our team forum, and I believe them....but I think our guys more than held their own tonight. GG Helsinki. May we meet again in the playoffs
This is pretty accurate. We lost our entire LB corps from last year, and as a result, it is our biggest weakness. However, we're working on gameplans that can compensate for that. He's also right about their defense... they did a great job containing the run while remaining stingy to the pass. They are a great team, and when we boost we'll meet them in the playoffs >: )
The exception is the interceptions, which were definitely characteristic of our pass D, which I consider to be one of our strong suits.
the exception is the best QB in the leauge?.... oh wait you mean when the ball is intercepted, not this guy:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=879709
my bad
Originally posted by Chefnastee
Originally posted by goldielax25
stockholm got out-gameplanned badly in that game
I'm going to have to disagree. The score was actually much closer than it should have been, and all 3 INT's on our part were uncharacteristic bad throws or went right through our WR's hands. Hesinki had no real answer for our running game and outside of one play, their offense was held in check. If I'm not mistaken, they averaged 450+ rushing ypg coming into this game. They were held to 100 tonight.
The guys on Stockholm that know Xelstyle had nothing but good words to say about him in our team forum, and I believe them....but I think our guys more than held their own tonight. GG Helsinki. May we meet again in the playoffs
This is pretty accurate. We lost our entire LB corps from last year, and as a result, it is our biggest weakness. However, we're working on gameplans that can compensate for that. He's also right about their defense... they did a great job containing the run while remaining stingy to the pass. They are a great team, and when we boost we'll meet them in the playoffs >: )
The exception is the interceptions, which were definitely characteristic of our pass D, which I consider to be one of our strong suits.
the exception is the best QB in the leauge?.... oh wait you mean when the ball is intercepted, not this guy:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=879709
my bad
Last edited Jan 14, 2009 14:33:29
Chefnastee
offline
offline
Originally posted by goldielax25
stockholm passed, and because they did the game was close. thats not a characteristic of good game planning, when you pass against an exceptional pass defense when you could run against an above-average one, with an exceptional running game. if stockholm stuck to the ground the game wouldnt have been close. i stand by the out-gameplanned statement.
Fair enough.
stockholm passed, and because they did the game was close. thats not a characteristic of good game planning, when you pass against an exceptional pass defense when you could run against an above-average one, with an exceptional running game. if stockholm stuck to the ground the game wouldnt have been close. i stand by the out-gameplanned statement.
Fair enough.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
