Warrior General Games

Originally posted by McGruffHawk
Originally posted by dpell

The whole points of the BCS is to compare teams who haven't or won't play each other.

No, the whole point of the BCS is to give out meaningless trophies to teams that don't deserve them.

Which, ironically, will be about the same relevance of this ranking at the end of the season.

No, it was to get a #1 vs. #2 title game every year.

It doesnt really matter. Just get to the playoffs. The cream usually rises to the top there. A loss or two never hurt anyone. Make the playoffs and win your last game of the season and you will be #1

Originally posted by dpell
See, I always thought they didn't like Cajuns and crushed them.

LOL, I have heard that a dozen times but it is still funny. I use the Cajun Crusher name for most of my Fantasy Football teams as well.

And as for you Splitter 24, the boys at CCC know what Cajuns are I have schooled most of them on our proud culture. I do realize when I started this team that I used a non Oceania name, when I signed on here there where like 500 teams tops in all of GLB. Who knew it would grow into the world fake football phenomenon it is now. I picked up the Cascade name as a tribute to my love of beer and to honor Hobart the original home given to my team before I purchased the team.

I guess when kicking everyone ass gets too easy some of you guys have to spend your time worrying about the petty shit. Unfortunately C.C.C. does not have that luxury. I tend to worry more about game planning and how to exploit matchups, we need all we can get.

I may not have any reading comprehension, spelling or grammatical skills, maybe not even a cull factor with the ladies but who gives a shit, that’s the beauty of being a coon-ass. I will not judge you and I could give a shit what you think of me. Les’a le Bon Temp Roule!

All that talk of lipstick and pigs is tends to build up a lot of sexual tension on here.

Originally posted by DollarBill
Originally posted by McGruffHawk

Originally posted by dpell


The whole points of the BCS is to compare teams who haven't or won't play each other.

No, the whole point of the BCS is to give out meaningless trophies to teams that don't deserve them.

Which, ironically, will be about the same relevance of this ranking at the end of the season.

No, it was to get a #1 vs. #2 title game every year.

yeah, based on the year PSU and Nebraska were clear #1's, but stupid bowl tie in's prevented PSU from getting even a share of the title (along with a garbage sympathy vote for Osbourne)..the problem is that it will rarely be a clear cut 2 undefeated teams, and then the stupid biased humans have 2/3 of the poll. So teams like Utah get screwed, even with a better SOS than most of the SEC West and Bama.

BcS Blows

I never understood why it is so important to get the over analyzed biased opinion of some tick turd who never played a down of football. Ok maybe not all AP writers are a bunch of team color bleeding frat boys who lived to smell the jocks of the real athletes in college, but most fit that category. I have always put more stock in a SOS system; high schools in every state have used it for years to seed playoffs. I know we need a playoff system but I disagree with guarantying any conference a bid (like the BCS). I think you must combine a SOS CPU system and a coach’s poll to seed the top 8 or 16 teams. Sides note, I feel a Coach’s poll is also terribly bias but I trust a football guy over a pencil pusher with too much time on his hands.

Originally posted by midlineveer
Originally posted by dpell

See, I always thought they didn't like Cajuns and crushed them.

LOL, I have heard that a dozen times but it is still funny. I use the Cajun Crusher name for most of my Fantasy Football teams as well.

And as for you Splitter 24, the boys at CCC know what Cajuns are I have schooled most of them on our proud culture. I do realize when I started this team that I used a non Oceania name, when I signed on here there where like 500 teams tops in all of GLB. Who knew it would grow into the world fake football phenomenon it is now. I picked up the Cascade name as a tribute to my love of beer and to honor Hobart the original home given to my team before I purchased the team.

I guess when kicking everyone ass gets too easy some of you guys have to spend your time worrying about the petty shit. Unfortunately C.C.C. does not have that luxury. I tend to worry more about game planning and how to exploit matchups, we need all we can get.

I may not have any reading comprehension, spelling or grammatical skills, maybe not even a cull factor with the ladies but who gives a shit, that’s the beauty of being a coon-ass. I will not judge you and I could give a shit what you think of me. Les’a le Bon Temp Roule!

All that talk of lipstick and pigs is tends to build up a lot of sexual tension on here.


Oh I have absolutely no problem with your team name at all. Just using it as an example for the one person who seems to have a problem with my own team's non-Oceanic name. You Cascade boys should in know way take anything that I have said as some sort of slight.

P.S. - I am also known for my love of beer. I just don't own my own team to name it after. Though some of my players do have some custom equipment named after some barley beverages.

14 teams.

#1 and #2 get a bye.

Seeds as follows
6 "BCS" conf champs
Any undefeated non BCS
Any BCS conf team that was undefeated in their conference (aka, only loss came out of conf)
any non BCS team that was undefeated in their conference

then come the wild cards.

A) Wins
B) head to head
C) Strength of Schedule


seed em and away they go

it can all be done by the same date as the current NC game, and also the other bowls go on, and their pathetic attendance and viewership stay the same.

Bowl games rotate. Rose Bowl will always be a semi-final with once ever 5 years being the NC game as well

Do this, and NCAA will flourish
Do it not, and every one of your men will die here today...oh wait

Who CARES. There's no bowls on here so there's little point in rankings since its a pro league anyways. Either you win the championship or you DON'T.

Originally posted by JBennett23
Who CARES. There's no bowls on here so there's little point in rankings since its a pro league anyways. Either you win the championship or you DON'T.

Agreed with that

Something to compare the teams that will never play each other in a season is nice exercise, and can spark imo some interesting conversations. It can give an attempt at the relative strengths of the teams to help with seeing what is an upset and what isn't, in (one would hope) a less objective setting. Cause other then that, the only other usefulness of any ranking in the forums is bragging rights.

Originally posted by Mystico3
14 teams.

#1 and #2 get a bye.

Seeds as follows
6 "BCS" conf champs
Any undefeated non BCS
Any BCS conf team that was undefeated in their conference (aka, only loss came out of conf)
any non BCS team that was undefeated in their conference

then come the wild cards.

A) Wins
B) head to head
C) Strength of Schedule


seed em and away they go

it can all be done by the same date as the current NC game, and also the other bowls go on, and their pathetic attendance and viewership stay the same.

Bowl games rotate. Rose Bowl will always be a semi-final with once ever 5 years being the NC game as well

Do this, and NCAA will flourish
Do it not, and every one of your men will die here today...oh wait

You know that is a great idea, I read something like this a couple of seasons ago, I think your system would be a great starting point. Good points and I think we can close the discussion on that excellent post. I could talk NCAA football all day but it looks like kids are crying about it so lets stick to fake football.

if you read it a couple years ago, you must have been on the CBS Sportsline website...it is mine mine allllll mine

Originally posted by Mystico3
if you read it a couple years ago, you must have been on the CBS Sportsline website...it is mine mine allllll mine

I said I read something like it. Man you guys on here are getting worse every season. Pretty soon if an man farts he will have to give an accurate record of what he ate and where. It was ment as a complement, if I knew what I do now I would have told you it was stupid and you idea sucks.

Originally posted by midlineveer
Originally posted by Mystico3

if you read it a couple years ago, you must have been on the CBS Sportsline website...it is mine mine allllll mine

I said I read something like it. Man you guys on here are getting worse every season. Pretty soon if an man farts he will have to give an accurate record of what he ate and where. It was ment as a complement, if I knew what I do now I would have told you it was stupid and you idea sucks.

You need to 'understand' Mystico.

Just say 'Fucking Mystico' while shaking your head. Really all you gotta do.

Originally posted by midlineveer
I never understood why it is so important to get the over analyzed biased opinion of some tick turd who never played a down of football. Ok maybe not all AP writers are a bunch of team color bleeding frat boys who lived to smell the jocks of the real athletes in college, but most fit that category. I have always put more stock in a SOS system; high schools in every state have used it for years to seed playoffs. I know we need a playoff system but I disagree with guarantying any conference a bid (like the BCS). I think you must combine a SOS CPU system and a coach’s poll to seed the top 8 or 16 teams. Sides note, I feel a Coach’s poll is also terribly bias but I trust a football guy over a pencil pusher with too much time on his hands.


Um, you do not have to do a thing in order to study it. Such a suggestion is silly. There are many great coaches who were awful players, and probably quite a few who never played at all. And coaches have to be able to demonstrate a skill, while writers/analysts do not.

In fact, players are often the very least able to understand their sport well. Truly excellent players operate on such an elite, instinctual level, that they often cannot approach it on an intellectual level. Probably the poster child for this phenomenon is baseball's Joe Morgan--one of the best second basemen of all time, but infamous for his stubborn and wrongheaded beliefs about baseball (and one of the worst announcers to ever call a game).