Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Shaddow74
This reminds me of something Clemens and Bonds might have said. " Senator, I did not take steriods. I just got bigger and stronger the older i got."

I look forward to playing Siena. I know you guys feel the same way.


Who are you?

Originally posted by wallysmith
Originally posted by Jayadamo

Originally posted by Shaddow74


This reminds me of something Clemens and Bonds might have said. " Senator, I did not take steriods. I just got bigger and stronger the older i got."

I look forward to playing Siena. I know you guys feel the same way.


Who are you?



If they beat Siena I will edit this post

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=236736

That is all.

Originally posted by Jackula1027
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=236736

That is all.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA...i can't wait for my team to be done slow building because i know this team will still be here unless they move up by default (cpu team)

BTW....Mannheim has 46 regular season wins...the london pounds have 34...back to the bus you go.

Originally posted by Jackula1027
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=236736

That is all.

you forgot three other meetings between the two, in which the record is 2-2,

you guys went what 10-6, we went 13-3

and the season before

you - 8-8, us - 12-4

and the one before that

you - 10-6, us - 9-7

and the one before that

you - 6-10, us 12-4

so here is a little history leason, since you are the one wanting to go there,

Jaguars>Pounds

THAT IS ALL

That game was important because you guys looked like you were on the verge of going undefeated, or 15-1 to be realistic. Plus it's about what you have done recently that matters. You guys trashed your team to slowbuild, which will serve you better in the long run. But you are going to have to deal with losing for a long time before you will ever taste success again (except when you face all the CPUs in BBB).

I used that game as an example to show a huge upset, not because it represented the series betweent the 2.

Originally posted by Jackula1027
That game was important because you guys looked like you were on the verge of going undefeated, or 15-1 to be realistic. Plus it's about what you have done recently that matters. You guys trashed your team to slowbuild, which will serve you better in the long run. But you are going to have to deal with losing for a long time before you will ever taste success again (except when you face all the CPUs in BBB).

I used that game as an example to show a huge upset, not because it represented the series betweent the 2.

London got lucky in that game,

Even a blind squirrel can find a nut

Coaching imo.

Originally posted by Jackula1027
Coaching imo.

Could just be me, but it seems like you're hurting your own cause. You brought up a game as an example of how London is better, then when faced with facts about Mannheim's long run of success, downplay the original game as an "upset." Then when called lucky for winning the game, you credit coaching.

If coaching was the reason London won that game, then it can be a reasonable assumption that coaching is the reason for Mannheim's continued success. And if that's the barometer we're using, then Mannheim is clearly the better team, by leaps and bounds. If London outcoached Mannheim for a game, then Mannheim's outcoached London for entire (multiple) seasons. Just the fact that Mannheim had a chance for an unbeaten season while London has never even sniffed that is reason to dead the argument right there.

Originally posted by wallysmith
Originally posted by Jackula1027

Coaching imo.

Could just be me, but it seems like you're hurting your own cause. You brought up a game as an example of how London is better, then when faced with facts about Mannheim's long run of success, downplay the original game as an "upset." Then when called lucky for winning the game, you credit coaching.

If coaching was the reason London won that game, then it can be a reasonable assumption that coaching is the reason for Mannheim's continued success. And if that's the barometer we're using, then Mannheim is clearly the better team, by leaps and bounds. If London outcoached Mannheim for a game, then Mannheim's outcoached London for entire (multiple) seasons. Just the fact that Mannheim had a chance for an unbeaten season while London has never even sniffed that is reason to dead the argument right there.

Thanks, sometimes I wish Mannheim didn't go slow build so that we could have enjoyed a very successful season. Oh well...some day, we'll get our revenge.