Okla State, who did they beat?
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
when you can prove a point, then you can win the argument.
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
when you can prove a point, then you can win the argument.
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
when you can prove a point, then you can win the argument.
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
Neither one of them would be favored over USC. It's already been said by the "proffessionals".
Like I said in my previous post, crawl back in your hole because you know nothing of College football.
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
not really, all you got off on saying was bitch this bitch that crawl in your hole bitch
you didn't say anything otherwise to prove a point
Sad thing is, that was still more than you had to say about any of it.
when you can prove a point, then you can win the argument.
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
Neither one of them would be favored over USC. It's already been said by the "proffessionals".
Like I said in my previous post, crawl back in your hole because you know nothing of College football.
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
Hmmm, Oklahoma would be favored over USC and Florida would probably be favored over USC.
Take a second to review your statement that makes no sense. Florida is favored over Oklahoma, then why would Okla. be favored over USC but Florida may possibly be not?
oklahoma would be favored over usc.....florida would probably be favored too, but you'd never see it....too much of a usc homer
Hmmm, Oklahoma would be favored over USC and Florida would probably be favored over USC.
Take a second to review your statement that makes no sense. Florida is favored over Oklahoma, then why would Okla. be favored over USC but Florida may possibly be not?
Hokiemon
offline
offline
Here ya go Stout. In case you're afraid to click the link...
"Florida, the No. 1 college football team from a betting perspective, would have been favored by 7 points against USC; by 8 against Texas; by 9 against Alabama; by 13 against Penn State or Texas Tech; and by 19 against Utah, according to Bell. Those numbers are based on games set at a neutral field."
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/10/oddsmakers-back-bcs-title-pairing/
Is that good enough to qualify as "professional" opinion? Or were you actually referring to ESPN as professional opinion? If so, I wasted my time making you look like a fool, since you've already done it
"Florida, the No. 1 college football team from a betting perspective, would have been favored by 7 points against USC; by 8 against Texas; by 9 against Alabama; by 13 against Penn State or Texas Tech; and by 19 against Utah, according to Bell. Those numbers are based on games set at a neutral field."
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/10/oddsmakers-back-bcs-title-pairing/
Is that good enough to qualify as "professional" opinion? Or were you actually referring to ESPN as professional opinion? If so, I wasted my time making you look like a fool, since you've already done it
soapbox
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hokiemon
Here ya go Stout. In case you're afraid to click the link...
"Florida, the No. 1 college football team from a betting perspective, would have been favored by 7 points against USC; by 8 against Texas; by 9 against Alabama; by 13 against Penn State or Texas Tech; and by 19 against Utah, according to Bell. Those numbers are based on games set at a neutral field."
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/10/oddsmakers-back-bcs-title-pairing/
Is that good enough to qualify as "professional" opinion? Or were you actually referring to ESPN as professional opinion? If so, I wasted my time making you look like a fool, since you've already done it
But ESPN knows what they're talking about...uhh..yeah!
I guess I can't rip on all of them too hard. I think all of their NCAAF analysts are on the dumb side, but I love Dilfer and some of the other former players (Schlereth, etc) and their analysis. I just think that, with the quality of gamefilm the analysts get, they should be able to do a better job comparing players. I mean like all of the analysts picked Alabama except maybe one or two (vs Florida), and I honestly was shocked. And now they're saying that Oklahoma's offense might be too much for Florida? I want to know if they know how to analyze stats at all. Or at least be able to analyze gamefilm.
/rant
Edit: And don't forget WHERE the game's being played. It's a home game for Florida.
Here ya go Stout. In case you're afraid to click the link...
"Florida, the No. 1 college football team from a betting perspective, would have been favored by 7 points against USC; by 8 against Texas; by 9 against Alabama; by 13 against Penn State or Texas Tech; and by 19 against Utah, according to Bell. Those numbers are based on games set at a neutral field."
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/10/oddsmakers-back-bcs-title-pairing/
Is that good enough to qualify as "professional" opinion? Or were you actually referring to ESPN as professional opinion? If so, I wasted my time making you look like a fool, since you've already done it
But ESPN knows what they're talking about...uhh..yeah!
I guess I can't rip on all of them too hard. I think all of their NCAAF analysts are on the dumb side, but I love Dilfer and some of the other former players (Schlereth, etc) and their analysis. I just think that, with the quality of gamefilm the analysts get, they should be able to do a better job comparing players. I mean like all of the analysts picked Alabama except maybe one or two (vs Florida), and I honestly was shocked. And now they're saying that Oklahoma's offense might be too much for Florida? I want to know if they know how to analyze stats at all. Or at least be able to analyze gamefilm.
/rant
Edit: And don't forget WHERE the game's being played. It's a home game for Florida.
Last edited Dec 18, 2008 21:25:37
Earth Wan
offline
offline
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
Never before have I seen such blatant douche-baggery. USC got PWNED by a little 5 foot 7 inch beaver named Jacquizz lmao
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
Never before have I seen such blatant douche-baggery. USC got PWNED by a little 5 foot 7 inch beaver named Jacquizz lmao
soapbox
offline
offline
Originally posted by Earth Wan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
Never before have I seen such blatant douche-baggery. USC got PWNED by a little 5 foot 7 inch beaver named Jacquizz lmao
USC would clearly beat all but maybe 2-3 teams right now. For the 3rd year in a row, they took a game off and it cost them. That's about it.
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
last time i checked they weren't playing for the national championship, so it really doesn't matter.
Look dude, I never said they should be. All I stated was that USC would be favored over anyone they played.
Take what you want from that. Either way I still owned your ass.
Never before have I seen such blatant douche-baggery. USC got PWNED by a little 5 foot 7 inch beaver named Jacquizz lmao
USC would clearly beat all but maybe 2-3 teams right now. For the 3rd year in a row, they took a game off and it cost them. That's about it.
majech
offline
offline
That's what I LOVE about college football. Taking a game off ends your season. It's a 3 month pressure cooker.
USC would clearly beat Oregon State...DOH. USC would clearly beat Stanford...DOH. USC, "the greatest team of all time", would clearly beat Texas in the championship game...DOH. Reggie Bush is going to DOMINATE the NFL and CLEARLY should be chosen over Mario Williams...DOH!
USC would clearly beat Oregon State...DOH. USC would clearly beat Stanford...DOH. USC, "the greatest team of all time", would clearly beat Texas in the championship game...DOH. Reggie Bush is going to DOMINATE the NFL and CLEARLY should be chosen over Mario Williams...DOH!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
