oh well
Saintsfan83
offline
offline
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
YOM77
offline
offline
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Take your sour grapes and go cry elsewhere little boy.
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Take your sour grapes and go cry elsewhere little boy.
Last edited Dec 15, 2008 19:36:31
Jiddy78
offline
offline
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Donald Williams tosses J Bo's salad IMO.
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Donald Williams tosses J Bo's salad IMO.
davi2188
offline
offline
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFs5l9K--7M&feature=related
somebody is mad that they lost...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFs5l9K--7M&feature=related
somebody is mad that they lost...
Slayer4099
offline
offline
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
Saintsfan83
offline
offline
Originally posted by YOM77
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Take your sour grapes and go cry elsewhere little boy.
so much for sour grapes posting a "you tube" video in your little girls room and you get your Panties in a bunch get a f-ing life
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
its not like I post here a lot plus its just an Internet Forum its not life buddy
Take your sour grapes and go cry elsewhere little boy.
so much for sour grapes posting a "you tube" video in your little girls room and you get your Panties in a bunch get a f-ing life
tciss
offline
offline
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
Skvan
offline
offline
Personally I would rather lose and play fair than win by using exploited plays over and over and over again. If they are pleased with winning in this manner then I hope they get promoted and out of our league.
Saintsfan83
offline
offline
wow this sounds like Madden I dont think I will be playing GLB very much longer is I see more and more of this
YOM77
offline
offline
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
wow this sounds like Madden I dont think I will be playing GLB very much longer is I see more and more of this
Good riddance!
wow this sounds like Madden I dont think I will be playing GLB very much longer is I see more and more of this
Good riddance!
YOM77
offline
offline
Originally posted by Saintsfan83
do you wait on me to post so you can respond
Yes. I also wait by the phone for you to call.
You and I were supposed to spoon tonight. Where the hell are you?
do you wait on me to post so you can respond
Yes. I also wait by the phone for you to call.
You and I were supposed to spoon tonight. Where the hell are you?
Slayer4099
offline
offline
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
If they were "exploit" plays, Bort would have pulled them.
Go read the forums chump, they're stoppable. You just have to decide if you're going to sell out or not. We chose not to sell out during the first round, but we didn't cry like a bunch of bitches when WRL gave us a good game using a similar game plan.
So which team is the only team during our game to use the WR screen and the so called "exploit" run plays? Hmmm... hard to answer that one, huh? So by your logic (and language), you used 3 "exploit" plays and we used 2. So which team tried to exploit which?
Check your stats boy, your team can't stop the run. We watched the Yak game and copied it with an exclamation point.
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
If they were "exploit" plays, Bort would have pulled them.
Go read the forums chump, they're stoppable. You just have to decide if you're going to sell out or not. We chose not to sell out during the first round, but we didn't cry like a bunch of bitches when WRL gave us a good game using a similar game plan.
So which team is the only team during our game to use the WR screen and the so called "exploit" run plays? Hmmm... hard to answer that one, huh? So by your logic (and language), you used 3 "exploit" plays and we used 2. So which team tried to exploit which?
Check your stats boy, your team can't stop the run. We watched the Yak game and copied it with an exclamation point.
domenick2x
offline
offline
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
If they were "exploit" plays, Bort would have pulled them.
Go read the forums chump, they're stoppable. You just have to decide if you're going to sell out or not. We chose not to sell out during the first round, but we didn't cry like a bunch of bitches when WRL gave us a good game using a similar game plan.
So which team is the only team during our game to use the WR screen and the so called "exploit" run plays? Hmmm... hard to answer that one, huh? So by your logic (and language), you used 3 "exploit" plays and we used 2. So which team tried to exploit which?
Check your stats boy, your team can't stop the run. We watched the Yak game and copied it with an exclamation point.
*looks around*
Who, us?
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by tciss
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
Originally posted by Slayer4099
Originally posted by MushMouthMike
THat was sick that you guys only threw 4 times, and 1 of those 4 went the other way for 101 yard TD. Wow that game could have went either way. It wasn't exactly a defensive struggle...no punts
That was my fault, we should have danced with the one that brung us. Tried to get fancy on the goal line and it was a 14 point swing.
Yeah you guys had a hell of a game plan. It basically came down to a missed XP, and we just happened to have the ball last.
You call that a good game plan? Really Mike? Let's see, call the same two runs up the middle over and over(73 times). Not much imagination. I have more to say about such a strategy but I'll keep it to myself.
Apparently class isn't your strong suit.
Actually I call that an outstanding game plan (with the exception of the 4 pass plays). You were obviously not expecting it.
It's not the fact that you ran 73 times, but that you only ran the two known exploit plays. Nice and classy way to try and steal a win. There is no difference between this and throwing WR screens every play. Either way you are trying to exploit the system instead of playing straight up.
If they were "exploit" plays, Bort would have pulled them.
Go read the forums chump, they're stoppable. You just have to decide if you're going to sell out or not. We chose not to sell out during the first round, but we didn't cry like a bunch of bitches when WRL gave us a good game using a similar game plan.
So which team is the only team during our game to use the WR screen and the so called "exploit" run plays? Hmmm... hard to answer that one, huh? So by your logic (and language), you used 3 "exploit" plays and we used 2. So which team tried to exploit which?
Check your stats boy, your team can't stop the run. We watched the Yak game and copied it with an exclamation point.
*looks around*
Who, us?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
