Originally posted by BillSaidSux
Originally posted by aariafromarty
And with BCS rules, the Revenge would be like .950 and Terror like .860. The Terror's best win is against SSS. Revenge has two top quality wins. Sorry Trip, you guys are basically USC playing in the PAC 10 while the Revenge has beaten top 10 SEC teams.
Wait, your scenario would require the SEC to have three good teams. Please start naming them and if you get past Alabama and Florida you are insane. LSU and Georgia are the only other two teams you could even bring up and those guys aren't nearly as good as they were supposed to be. I guess it comes down to what you think "good" means, but you certainly can't call UGA's win over LSU a "quality victory". I guess that means that to me "good" means a 11/12 win football team and a legitimate top 10 team.
I think what you meant to say was "Big 12" unless your point was that the BCS has an inherent bias since it uses the human polls (which have an inherent SEC bias, which is mostly earned and partly mythology, lets be honest here, UT, Auburn and USC minor were supposed to be pretty good and they all suck. Half the SEC is apparently made up of Clemson this year.)
Full disclosure: I'm a Georgia Tech fan, so I am an expert on what a mediocre conference looks like. You should not try to debate me on this.
Originally posted by
Until the Big 12 wins a National Championship against the SEC, they will be 2nd to the SEC. But sure with the one loss comparisons, the Big 12 would have been a better analogy.
Noted Vince Young and Texas were a great team. I would have loved to see them play Tim Tebow's Florida
Originally posted by aariafromarty
And with BCS rules, the Revenge would be like .950 and Terror like .860. The Terror's best win is against SSS. Revenge has two top quality wins. Sorry Trip, you guys are basically USC playing in the PAC 10 while the Revenge has beaten top 10 SEC teams.
Wait, your scenario would require the SEC to have three good teams. Please start naming them and if you get past Alabama and Florida you are insane. LSU and Georgia are the only other two teams you could even bring up and those guys aren't nearly as good as they were supposed to be. I guess it comes down to what you think "good" means, but you certainly can't call UGA's win over LSU a "quality victory". I guess that means that to me "good" means a 11/12 win football team and a legitimate top 10 team.
I think what you meant to say was "Big 12" unless your point was that the BCS has an inherent bias since it uses the human polls (which have an inherent SEC bias, which is mostly earned and partly mythology, lets be honest here, UT, Auburn and USC minor were supposed to be pretty good and they all suck. Half the SEC is apparently made up of Clemson this year.)
Full disclosure: I'm a Georgia Tech fan, so I am an expert on what a mediocre conference looks like. You should not try to debate me on this.
Originally posted by
Until the Big 12 wins a National Championship against the SEC, they will be 2nd to the SEC. But sure with the one loss comparisons, the Big 12 would have been a better analogy.
Noted Vince Young and Texas were a great team. I would have loved to see them play Tim Tebow's Florida
