Look at todays game reno is overated-->
TtD
offline
offline
Well that's our stinker done for the season, hopefully no more car crash games from now until playoffs.
futuregm
offline
offline
Originally posted by nefer
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
Rubeskies
offline
offline
Originally posted by futuregm
Originally posted by nefer
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
The only reason that game was close is that you found a way to exploit us by running the same running play 100 times.
Props to you for seeing that. But I'm really glad you did though so that we can get that fixed.
If we didn't return all of the kicks for TDs, it wouldn't have mattered that much. Your secondary got torched and you didn't exactly stop the running game either. You allowed 7.8 yards per rush and 11 yards per passing attempt. I don't think your D was gonna get many stops.
Originally posted by nefer
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
The only reason that game was close is that you found a way to exploit us by running the same running play 100 times.
Props to you for seeing that. But I'm really glad you did though so that we can get that fixed.
If we didn't return all of the kicks for TDs, it wouldn't have mattered that much. Your secondary got torched and you didn't exactly stop the running game either. You allowed 7.8 yards per rush and 11 yards per passing attempt. I don't think your D was gonna get many stops.
futuregm
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by futuregm
Originally posted by nefer
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
The only reason that game was close is that you found a way to exploit us by running the same running play 100 times.
Props to you for seeing that. But I'm really glad you did though so that we can get that fixed.
If we didn't return all of the kicks for TDs, it wouldn't have mattered that much. Your secondary got torched and you didn't exactly stop the running game either. You allowed 7.8 yards per rush and 11 yards per passing attempt. I don't think your D was gonna get many stops.
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
Originally posted by futuregm
Originally posted by nefer
Look at todays game reno is overated-->
If it weren't for 4 special teams TD's, Bay Area would have won that game. I need to address my special teams! We ran the ball down their throats and out gained them on offense.
The only reason that game was close is that you found a way to exploit us by running the same running play 100 times.
Props to you for seeing that. But I'm really glad you did though so that we can get that fixed.
If we didn't return all of the kicks for TDs, it wouldn't have mattered that much. Your secondary got torched and you didn't exactly stop the running game either. You allowed 7.8 yards per rush and 11 yards per passing attempt. I don't think your D was gonna get many stops.
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
SkersAllTheWay
offline
offline
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Rubeskies
offline
offline
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Last edited Nov 19, 2008 13:50:06
nefer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I
see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last
season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me
having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team
will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Well then why didint u study us that we are gonna do ? Isint it almost like 100% sure that we are gonna run the ball when we are stronger on the run. I think people is only complaining about power I formation just because they dont build theyr players to go against it.
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I
see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last
season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me
having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team
will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Well then why didint u study us that we are gonna do ? Isint it almost like 100% sure that we are gonna run the ball when we are stronger on the run. I think people is only complaining about power I formation just because they dont build theyr players to go against it.
Rubeskies
offline
offline
Originally posted by nefer
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I
see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last
season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me
having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team
will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Well then why didint u study us that we are gonna do ? Isint it almost like 100% sure that we are gonna run the ball when we are stronger on the run. I think people is only complaining about power I formation just because they dont build theyr players to go against it.
As I said earlier, hats off to you for exploiting me with it. Fool me once, good work. Fool me twice, shame on me.
That being said, the Reno is overrated comments were a bit much considering you have a good team and we still destroyed your defense and and special teams and still won despite basically giving you a free pass to run to the right anytime you wanted. So that means the team itself is very good to overcome that despite the hiccup in gameplanning which will be corrected.
Also, who is overating us? Everybody said we hadn't been tested, including us.
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I
see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last
season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me
having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team
will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Well then why didint u study us that we are gonna do ? Isint it almost like 100% sure that we are gonna run the ball when we are stronger on the run. I think people is only complaining about power I formation just because they dont build theyr players to go against it.
As I said earlier, hats off to you for exploiting me with it. Fool me once, good work. Fool me twice, shame on me.
That being said, the Reno is overrated comments were a bit much considering you have a good team and we still destroyed your defense and and special teams and still won despite basically giving you a free pass to run to the right anytime you wanted. So that means the team itself is very good to overcome that despite the hiccup in gameplanning which will be corrected.
Also, who is overating us? Everybody said we hadn't been tested, including us.
Last edited Nov 19, 2008 14:02:07
klaydog
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
Rubeskies
offline
offline
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
Thefranchise
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
This sounds like someone defending their cheese in Madden. LMAO.
Not you Rube but the other guy.
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
This sounds like someone defending their cheese in Madden. LMAO.
Not you Rube but the other guy.
klaydog
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
It must have been an AI malfunction. I'll have it fixed the next time we meet. There's other things we could have did, but I messed up the AI. There were two more things that would work great against your D. If we meet again, I'll show them to you.
And now you know one of your weaknesses. You're welcome. Until we meet again...
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
It must have been an AI malfunction. I'll have it fixed the next time we meet. There's other things we could have did, but I messed up the AI. There were two more things that would work great against your D. If we meet again, I'll show them to you.
And now you know one of your weaknesses. You're welcome. Until we meet again...
Rubeskies
offline
offline
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
It must have been an AI malfunction. I'll have it fixed the next time we meet. There's other things we could have did, but I messed up the AI. There were two more things that would work great against your D. If we meet again, I'll show them to you.
And now you know one of your weaknesses. You're welcome. Until we meet again...
I certainly thank you for showing me my defenses weakness, I said as much before. But I don't buy your "AI malfunction" for a second.
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by klaydog
Originally posted by Rubeskies
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Originally posted by futuregm
Isnt that the point in this tough league where everyone is great? To exploit match ups lol Either way good game.
I see this as a positive sign for my team. This was a gutted team last season with 4 players. Our chemistry is still suffering due to me having to re-build the past season and a half, but I feel that my team will be getting better each week.
You mean the Strong I Off Tackle play that Bort made too strong and has been discussed ad nauseum in the main forums???
Yup, they ran it about 50 times, lost, and are now claiming that "Reno is overrated"
Reno certainly shouldn't be #1, but after deliberation, nobody really thinks they should be.
Bomber OC here...it wasn't about running the Strong I OT play. Their defense of that formation allowed us to do what we did. If their D lined up like that against the shotgun, pro set, or single back formation, we would have ran from that formation. Yes, the strong I is powerful, but we ran it today b/c their D against that formation gave us the best chance to win.
GG game Reno and I hope to see you guys in the playoffs.
There are lots of run plays in the book to the right. Why did you run the strong I 50 times and the others maybe once?
It must have been an AI malfunction. I'll have it fixed the next time we meet. There's other things we could have did, but I messed up the AI. There were two more things that would work great against your D. If we meet again, I'll show them to you.
And now you know one of your weaknesses. You're welcome. Until we meet again...
I certainly thank you for showing me my defenses weakness, I said as much before. But I don't buy your "AI malfunction" for a second.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
