I have to go (I have a life), but I'd love to continue this later ...
Free Country
offline
offline
Originally posted by juicepod
Seriously, I take more criticism weekly about my picks then you probably ever have.
And yet, you single me out. Why is that?
Seriously, I take more criticism weekly about my picks then you probably ever have.
And yet, you single me out. Why is that?
juicepod
offline
offline
Originally posted by ColumbusBuck
Originally posted by juicepod
Seriously, I take more criticism weekly about my picks then you probably ever have.
And yet, you single me out. Why is that?
You obviously haven't read the rest of my picks. You must have a complex because you are far from singled out.
(And I love the I have a life line. I've never seen or heard it before. I get paid to be on here. Thanks.)
Originally posted by juicepod
Seriously, I take more criticism weekly about my picks then you probably ever have.
And yet, you single me out. Why is that?
You obviously haven't read the rest of my picks. You must have a complex because you are far from singled out.
(And I love the I have a life line. I've never seen or heard it before. I get paid to be on here. Thanks.)
Parab00n
offline
offline
Haha everytime Juicepod does a thread it ends up being a flame fest. Last game it was Aaron vs DD, now Juice vs Buck. Good entertainment and good for these forums.
juicepod
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
Haha everytime Juicepod does a thread it ends up being a flame fest. Last game it was Aaron vs DD, now Juice vs Buck. Good entertainment and good for these forums.
I was hoping Columbus would help me take this thread further then the first 2. No such luck. Maybe after the games are played.
Haha everytime Juicepod does a thread it ends up being a flame fest. Last game it was Aaron vs DD, now Juice vs Buck. Good entertainment and good for these forums.
I was hoping Columbus would help me take this thread further then the first 2. No such luck. Maybe after the games are played.
Klydon
offline
offline
Originally posted by ColumbusBuck
I have to go (I have a life), but I'd love to continue this later ...
If you are smart, you won't bother because right now, I don't think you can catch up. Just let it go before it gets worse.
I have to go (I have a life), but I'd love to continue this later ...
If you are smart, you won't bother because right now, I don't think you can catch up. Just let it go before it gets worse.
Mickgolden
offline
offline
Originally posted by Klydon
Originally posted by ColumbusBuck
I have to go (I have a life), but I'd love to continue this later ...
If you are smart, you won't bother because right now, I don't think you can catch up. Just let it go before it gets worse.
Klydon is a wise wise man.
Originally posted by ColumbusBuck
I have to go (I have a life), but I'd love to continue this later ...
If you are smart, you won't bother because right now, I don't think you can catch up. Just let it go before it gets worse.
Klydon is a wise wise man.
felixtovar
offline
offline
So I know I'm giving up 3 1/2 levels or so to ACT but how does a 70% run defense with 65% outside run defense give up an 81.5 yard run, a 75 yard run, a 64.5 yard, and a smaller but substantial 25.5 yard run all to the outside? Not only that but a total of 374 yards on the ground. Any ideas?
Sjostrom7
offline
offline
Senegal NATIONALS vs. Zimbabwe Black Rhinos
The NATS get to tell us how great they are when they beat another horrible team.
Senegal 30 - Zimbabwe 3
Maybe you should show our team a little respect. Considering the fact we just won. Also side note, we beat your team last year as well.
The NATS get to tell us how great they are when they beat another horrible team.
Senegal 30 - Zimbabwe 3
Maybe you should show our team a little respect. Considering the fact we just won. Also side note, we beat your team last year as well.
Aaron330
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
Haha everytime Juicepod does a thread it ends up being a flame fest. Last game it was Aaron vs DD, now Juice vs Buck. Good entertainment and good for these forums.
Agreed. Juicepod's prediction threads are the best source for quality entertainment, especially when bored at work
Haha everytime Juicepod does a thread it ends up being a flame fest. Last game it was Aaron vs DD, now Juice vs Buck. Good entertainment and good for these forums.
Agreed. Juicepod's prediction threads are the best source for quality entertainment, especially when bored at work

Klydon
offline
offline
GG Togo. Hopefully we will get a chance for a rematch later in the season and get a little revenge.
Klydon
offline
offline
Originally posted by felixtovar
So I know I'm giving up 3 1/2 levels or so to ACT but how does a 70% run defense with 65% outside run defense give up an 81.5 yard run, a 75 yard run, a 64.5 yard, and a smaller but substantial 25.5 yard run all to the outside? Not only that but a total of 374 yards on the ground. Any ideas?
Just at a glance, the answers are pretty obvious. On the 81 yard run, you had 4 missed tackles. The 64 yarder also had a missed tackle. The 75 yard gain had 2 missed tackles. All in all, they had 17 broken tackles on you. It sounds like you had a fairly good scheme, but your players let you down with all the missed tackles. Get that fixed and I think you will like the results quite a bit better.
So I know I'm giving up 3 1/2 levels or so to ACT but how does a 70% run defense with 65% outside run defense give up an 81.5 yard run, a 75 yard run, a 64.5 yard, and a smaller but substantial 25.5 yard run all to the outside? Not only that but a total of 374 yards on the ground. Any ideas?
Just at a glance, the answers are pretty obvious. On the 81 yard run, you had 4 missed tackles. The 64 yarder also had a missed tackle. The 75 yard gain had 2 missed tackles. All in all, they had 17 broken tackles on you. It sounds like you had a fairly good scheme, but your players let you down with all the missed tackles. Get that fixed and I think you will like the results quite a bit better.

felixtovar
offline
offline
Originally posted by Klydon
All in all, they had 17 broken tackles on you. It sounds like you had a fairly good scheme, but your players let you down with all the missed tackles. Get that fixed and I think you will like the results quite a bit better.
Sonofabitch! That doesn't look like it will be anytime soon unless I boost since I had set all my D players to "Wrap-up" tackle for this game.
All in all, they had 17 broken tackles on you. It sounds like you had a fairly good scheme, but your players let you down with all the missed tackles. Get that fixed and I think you will like the results quite a bit better.

Sonofabitch! That doesn't look like it will be anytime soon unless I boost since I had set all my D players to "Wrap-up" tackle for this game.

Last edited Sep 25, 2008 15:54:08
Aaron330
offline
offline
Originally posted by Klydon
GG Togo. Hopefully we will get a chance for a rematch later in the season and get a little revenge.
GG Cairo, always a close one when we play you. We'll not look forward to meeting you in the playoffs
GG Togo. Hopefully we will get a chance for a rematch later in the season and get a little revenge.
GG Cairo, always a close one when we play you. We'll not look forward to meeting you in the playoffs

Last edited Sep 25, 2008 15:55:51
juicepod
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sjostrom7
Senegal NATIONALS vs. Zimbabwe Black Rhinos
The NATS get to tell us how great they are when they beat another horrible team.
Senegal 30 - Zimbabwe 3
Maybe you should show our team a little respect. Considering the fact we just won. Also side note, we beat your team last year as well.
Haha! If it's not the Nattys complaining it's you. Everyone lighten up already.
Senegal NATIONALS vs. Zimbabwe Black Rhinos
The NATS get to tell us how great they are when they beat another horrible team.
Senegal 30 - Zimbabwe 3
Maybe you should show our team a little respect. Considering the fact we just won. Also side note, we beat your team last year as well.
Haha! If it's not the Nattys complaining it's you. Everyone lighten up already.

Last edited Sep 25, 2008 16:18:24
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.

























