on the plus side; Hayrow no longer the biggest a-hole on D'Haran.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Vet Ladder Talk 8/12
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
I'm not the only one who has a problem with you. At some point you probably should point the finger towards yourself.
One other hyper sensitive idiot who gets in fights regularly is that only other person...
At some point, you probably should point the finger towards yourself.
I'm not the only one who has a problem with you. At some point you probably should point the finger towards yourself.
One other hyper sensitive idiot who gets in fights regularly is that only other person...

At some point, you probably should point the finger towards yourself.
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
on the plus side; Hayrow no longer the biggest a-hole on D'Haran.
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Sorry if I offended your boyfriend. Won't make that mistake again.
on the plus side; Hayrow no longer the biggest a-hole on D'Haran.
Originally posted by Cuivienen
Sorry if I offended your boyfriend. Won't make that mistake again.
Cuivienen
offline
offline
Hey rob, I'm super duper sorry my dry sense of humor rubbed you the wrong way. If I polish your gifs for you, will you call off your bros?
I bet if you offer to polish his knob, all will be forgiven. Sov's mouth is probably getting tired anyway so I bet he'd like a break.
Spastic_Cowboy
offline
offline
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217837
I know Bronx has chemistry issues--and it's only a lolscrim with crappy playcalls for us--but damn that was nice to see. That's by FAR the best we've ever looked running the ball against them in any scrim or real game.
Don't think we ran a single counter last season, but they're definitely going back in the playbook now.
I know Bronx has chemistry issues--and it's only a lolscrim with crappy playcalls for us--but damn that was nice to see. That's by FAR the best we've ever looked running the ball against them in any scrim or real game.
Don't think we ran a single counter last season, but they're definitely going back in the playbook now.
Sov.
offline
offline
Originally posted by Spastic_Cowboy
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217837
I know Bronx has chemistry issues--and it's only a lolscrim with crappy playcalls for us--but damn that was nice to see. That's by FAR the best we've ever looked running the ball against them in any scrim or real game.
Don't think we ran a single counter last season, but they're definitely going back in the playbook now.
yeah gg, i am all for game balance and these changes definitely seemed to help make the run game more effective
one issue im having though is that since these changes, i feel like screen plays are much less effective. they already took a pretty hard hit when they changed the pursuit on the D, but now it seems guys cut inside right into defenders rather than cutting outside into wide open space. threat of the screen pass was the equivalent of threat of the forward pass for pure run teams. saw it happen over and over again in quite a few of our scrims testing multiple different types of screen plays
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/217837/43470
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217837
I know Bronx has chemistry issues--and it's only a lolscrim with crappy playcalls for us--but damn that was nice to see. That's by FAR the best we've ever looked running the ball against them in any scrim or real game.
Don't think we ran a single counter last season, but they're definitely going back in the playbook now.
yeah gg, i am all for game balance and these changes definitely seemed to help make the run game more effective
one issue im having though is that since these changes, i feel like screen plays are much less effective. they already took a pretty hard hit when they changed the pursuit on the D, but now it seems guys cut inside right into defenders rather than cutting outside into wide open space. threat of the screen pass was the equivalent of threat of the forward pass for pure run teams. saw it happen over and over again in quite a few of our scrims testing multiple different types of screen plays
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/217837/43470
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sov.
yeah gg, i am all for game balance and these changes definitely seemed to help make the run game more effective
one issue im having though is that since these changes, i feel like screen plays are much less effective. they already took a pretty hard hit when they changed the pursuit on the D, but now it seems guys cut inside right into defenders rather than cutting outside into wide open space. threat of the screen pass was the equivalent of threat of the forward pass for pure run teams. saw it happen over and over again in quite a few of our scrims testing multiple different types of screen plays
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/217837/43470
Watching the game it seems to be specific to wr odell beckham jr. Later in the game you can see adler take a screen and head towards the sideline. Try running the wr screens with adler at the 2 spot and i bet it looks better. Or put it in short i bet odell's run style is set to combo or north and south or something.
yeah gg, i am all for game balance and these changes definitely seemed to help make the run game more effective
one issue im having though is that since these changes, i feel like screen plays are much less effective. they already took a pretty hard hit when they changed the pursuit on the D, but now it seems guys cut inside right into defenders rather than cutting outside into wide open space. threat of the screen pass was the equivalent of threat of the forward pass for pure run teams. saw it happen over and over again in quite a few of our scrims testing multiple different types of screen plays
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/217837/43470
Watching the game it seems to be specific to wr odell beckham jr. Later in the game you can see adler take a screen and head towards the sideline. Try running the wr screens with adler at the 2 spot and i bet it looks better. Or put it in short i bet odell's run style is set to combo or north and south or something.
Spastic_Cowboy
offline
offline
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217925
Interesting scrim MEM vs Central. I'm sure I can do better with the run D, but not often you see a rushing team average 10ypc and lose. 51 to 17 TOP will do that I guess.
Interesting scrim MEM vs Central. I'm sure I can do better with the run D, but not often you see a rushing team average 10ypc and lose. 51 to 17 TOP will do that I guess.
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Spastic_Cowboy
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217925
Interesting scrim MEM vs Central. I'm sure I can do better with the run D, but not often you see a rushing team average 10ypc and lose. 51 to 17 TOP will do that I guess.
Keep in mind id never run that d vs a run heavy team.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/217925
Interesting scrim MEM vs Central. I'm sure I can do better with the run D, but not often you see a rushing team average 10ypc and lose. 51 to 17 TOP will do that I guess.
Keep in mind id never run that d vs a run heavy team.
Spastic_Cowboy
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Keep in mind id never run that d vs a run heavy team.
I pointed out our defense was pretty bad too. Just thought it was a cool game is all.
Keep in mind id never run that d vs a run heavy team.
I pointed out our defense was pretty bad too. Just thought it was a cool game is all.
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Spastic_Cowboy
I pointed out our defense was pretty bad too. Just thought it was a cool game is all.
yea i learned a lot, like counters dont work very well on mem for the most part
I pointed out our defense was pretty bad too. Just thought it was a cool game is all.
yea i learned a lot, like counters dont work very well on mem for the most part
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























