User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
wat up deathblade, AGD2D is 27th.

and those WRs are definitely not shitty

Maybe if you didn't just read a coding manual and finally learn how to fix CB coverage, i coulda proved it.


Now you're just trying too hard.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jampy2.0

If I throw 3k passes with AGD2Ds QB this season, I can guarantee you he is not the best QB in GLB, but he will be #1 in the HOF.



I wish you would try instead of being a little bitch about it.
 
Xavori
offline
Link
 
So let's settle this WR thing (cuz math isn't really that hard). Just always divide by targeted, and you can eliminate any bias created by a WR getting a lot more looks.

Hands in Pocket was targeted 534 times and picked up 3760 yards making for 7.0 yards per target. He caught 1 TD for every 20.5 targeted.

Randal Cobb was targeted 557 times for 4291.5 yards making 7.7 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.7 targets.

The Great Gatsby was targeted 310 for 2231 yards making 7.2 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.1 targets.

So, one you get it per target, it's pretty obvious the ranking of the top 3 HOF WR's should be:

1. Randal Cobb
2. The Great Gatsby
3. Hands in Pocket

Personally, I'd be happy with any of them on my team.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Xavori
So let's settle this WR thing (cuz math isn't really that hard). Just always divide by targeted, and you can eliminate any bias created by a WR getting a lot more looks.

Hands in Pocket was targeted 534 times and picked up 3760 yards making for 7.0 yards per target. He caught 1 TD for every 20.5 targeted.

Randal Cobb was targeted 557 times for 4291.5 yards making 7.7 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.7 targets.

The Great Gatsby was targeted 310 for 2231 yards making 7.2 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.1 targets.

So, one you get it per target, it's pretty obvious the ranking of the top 3 HOF WR's should be:

1. Randal Cobb
2. The Great Gatsby
3. Hands in Pocket

Personally, I'd be happy with any of them on my team.


Does this make my TE better than all of them then? Cos I don't think it should
Edited by mutleyddmc DTD on May 14, 2014 16:24:42
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
This is how I evaluate my WRs:

Yards per target * Rec/Target * Yards + (TDs * 7) - (Drops * 3)

Pure Possession WRs may not be targeted as often because they don't get the separation. If you want a clutch bot, he needs to actually be targeted when you need a clutch catch.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Now you're just trying too hard.


And you didnt try hard enough. You couldve at least looked at the team rank.
 
Merik
offline
Link
 
well Xavori it's not that easy cause you have to calculate with QB strength and o-line strength and strength of schedule, so if you really want to go mathematical it is hard

and this situation is never going to be settled but i agre that they are all good
Edited by Merik on May 14, 2014 16:32:57
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Xavori
So let's settle this WR thing (cuz math isn't really that hard). Just always divide by targeted, and you can eliminate any bias created by a WR getting a lot more looks.

Hands in Pocket was targeted 534 times and picked up 3760 yards making for 7.0 yards per target. He caught 1 TD for every 20.5 targeted.

Randal Cobb was targeted 557 times for 4291.5 yards making 7.7 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.7 targets.

The Great Gatsby was targeted 310 for 2231 yards making 7.2 yards per target. He caught 1 TD per 14.1 targets.

So, one you get it per target, it's pretty obvious the ranking of the top 3 HOF WR's should be:

1. Randal Cobb
2. The Great Gatsby
3. Hands in Pocket

Personally, I'd be happy with any of them on my team.


Pocket takes over games more than Gatsby but that might be because he has Justice and the others on his team to take away from him with probably similar builds. They are also much better YAC guys than Hands and Cobb too.
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
Anyone else noticed players being subbed in and out more often? Has energy/conditioning changed at all?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Haven't noticed anything different in my games.
 
Thunderoo
offline
Link
 
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/61474/64873

Corndog anyway to stop the CB running past a WR that's stopped???? Can't be an awareness issue btw
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Thunderoo
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/61474/64873

Corndog anyway to stop the CB running past a WR that's stopped???? Can't be an awareness issue btw


Yes
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
wait wat am i saying, agd2d has awful pass D


Tested.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/61462

Confirmed.

 
Xavori
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
Tested.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/61462

Confirmed.



You had to be cheating!

No way could you beat the awesomeness that is a Jampy-led team, especially not with a team a full tier below his!

The only logical explanation is u iz hax.

You should be ashamed of yourself...
 
Thunderoo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Yes


Awareness? Consistency? Guys got over 90 awareness so consistency then? (still that's not exactly low and this isn't the only case I've seen!)
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.