Originally posted by Gerr
GG RK, nice adjustments on defense and you just killed me with those 2 plays...
But what happened today just goes to prove my point that owners/coaches on Gold teams should be limited to one team only. RK has a really good recipe this season for winning, both of his Gold teams are in the conference finals, so hats off to him. But I also think that's hugely unfair as that gives an owner/coach twice as many chances to win Gold. Plus when you have a person like RK who is just dominating a season, he is doing it with two teams and is monopolizing the playoff spots.
Plus poor UT probably now has to face RK twice, first against TP in the Western Conference Finals, and again in the Championship game if UT beats TP and MG beats SBWL. Do you think for a second RK wont use the knowledge he gained from that game against UT in the championship game if they make it that far?
Don't get me wrong, I am not sore I lost, he beat me fair and square, so good job RK! I just don't like that he has 2 teams in Gold and thus allows him twice the chance to make it to the championship game. How fun will the championship game be if it's TP vs MG?!?Gerr, I have to give you credit. You have an uncanny ability of blowing things out of proportion. We all know this has been done millions of times in gold and I don't know why you bring this out now. This isn't your first time in gold and obviously there are other teams that has been doing this in the past and present. It's funny how you left all the other teams out and just focus only on my teams.
Also, I don't think I enjoyed any advantage to be quite honest. The more teams you are part of the more exposed you'll be. I remember when stoner had like millions of teams, and it actually made my game planning job easier since there was a lot of information available on how he does thing.
I hope you weren't being serious when you said UT pimps would be at a disadvantage. I'm sure they'll use their knowledge they gained from the conf final as well. There is always two sides of the story gerr. I think you had far more greater advantage against the philosophers in the 2nd round game with the yes/yes team than Maine gaining advantage from having a sister team. It's really an irony that you brought that out.
There is pros and cons to having more teams. First, the quality of game planning wouldn't be as good. I pretty much have reduced my AI in half ever since I started getting involved with more than one team. Other being the one I have already mentioned above.
By the way, I'm going to demote the philosophers. Not because of all your complaining but I already found another test team. Since this would be the last competitive game for the philosophers I decided to buy CE. Didn't realize how cheap the rental CE is and I guess Bort deserves little bit of my money for giving me the opportunity to enjoy this game with the philosophers without paying a single dime the last two seasons. Even the scrimmage games were covered by Bort's 100 flex point giveaways and prize money I won in tournament games.
It does sounds silly since I would still be at a significant disadvantage being 2 lvls behind (looks like I'll lvl up to 11 tomorrow) but this at least gives us a fighting chance and I'll probably regret it either way. An opportunity like this doesn't come very often, and I have a chance to put both teams in the final and first non-boosting team to make it to the gold final. This would probably only increase our chance from 5% to 20% but it should be well worth it, considering the significance of the game and a chance to make history. I already had this in mind since I would get a free level up. I'll just see this as CE+x1 boost deal with the price of CE
Anyway, I do think that one coordinator per one team is a good idea, just make sure you focus on the issue rather than putting out the frustration on me.