Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Sik Wit It
I honestly think the other half of the morale changes might be too much next season as it is. I don't think the reserve stuff will make it worthless again.

That's a good point, I forgot the the 2nd half was still coming.

Originally posted by David Stern
mentors disapeaer = 5 people who can do something. Sorry I speak GLB

ah lol ok

Originally posted by David Stern
Originally posted by Deathblade

Potential problem I see is making confidence less important at higher levels. A lot of players are already ending games at 70 morale minimum...would all players always end games at 100 (or more) with the change?

This is end-game talking, lower levels do NOT need higher energy/morale drain.

conf is about to double, and we also get 5 more roster slots for morale reducing players such as intimidating line backers.

- removal of motivational speaker with this change would probably be perfect TBH

That works too.

we're removing Mentor - removing MS makes sense too.

<------------- wouldn't fight the removal of MS at all.

Originally posted by Sik Wit It
Ah, but the actual REDUCTION in morale is based on confidence, not salary. You still need confidence to not hit a spiral, you will just have some more morale in reserves for when you do play bad. I honestly think the other half of the morale changes might be too much next season as it is. I don't think the reserve stuff will make it worthless again.

But let's say I have a morale reserve, right? If I play bad in the current system, I start dropping in performance, like I should. If I have a reserve, I may be able to play like shit for an entire half before I start to see the effects. I'm not liking that idea.

If I'd lose 60 morale in a normal game, going to 40, having a reserve of 35 and having the EXACT same reduction (60 morale), I'd be at what, 75 morale? 75 vs 40 for losing the exact same morale?

Unfortunately, it wouldn't work that well. If I do something stupid and lose morale, it drops my abilities, which then compounds and I perform worse. With a reserve, I'd fuck up over and over again, and still be at 100 morale because of my "reserve". Then, if I'm still at 100 morale, the chances of me fucking up again are lower than they would be if my morale was less than 100, am I right? So then, that 60 drop in morale might be reduced to a 30-40 drop, if not less. Then, my 35 reserve would allow me to stay at what, 95?

Originally posted by Catch22
we're removing Mentor - removing MS makes sense too.

progress here

Originally posted by Catch22
we're removing Mentor - removing MS makes sense too.

will suck to play glb without it, but with the player bank being able to bank (120) and the morale changes about to double it would really work itself out and sounds like we have a winner on all grounds with that

Originally posted by Catch22
we're removing Mentor - removing MS makes sense too.

Perfect! Because basically only K and P have it now anyways.

Originally posted by Catch22
we're removing Mentor - removing MS makes sense too.

I've never liked either.

Originally posted by blln4lyf
Seriously, I am trying to help you guys out by bumping this. This is a solid middle-ground, and will not make morale near useless at the high levels...give this a long hard look...

You'd really get rid of the perm bonuses? I can see getting rid of deterioration, but only having the temp bonuses means you have to worry about buying them constantly.

Originally posted by Staz
Originally posted by Sik Wit It

Ah, but the actual REDUCTION in morale is based on confidence, not salary. You still need confidence to not hit a spiral, you will just have some more morale in reserves for when you do play bad. I honestly think the other half of the morale changes might be too much next season as it is. I don't think the reserve stuff will make it worthless again.

But let's say I have a morale reserve, right? If I play bad in the current system, I start dropping in performance, like I should. If I have a reserve, I may be able to play like shit for an entire half before I start to see the effects. I'm not liking that idea.

If I'd lose 60 morale in a normal game, going to 40, having a reserve of 35 and having the EXACT same reduction (60 morale), I'd be at what, 75 morale? 75 vs 40 for losing the exact same morale?

Unfortunately, it wouldn't work that well. If I do something stupid and lose morale, it drops my abilities, which then compounds and I perform worse. With a reserve, I'd fuck up over and over again, and still be at 100 morale because of my "reserve". Then, if I'm still at 100 morale, the chances of me fucking up again are lower than they would be if my morale was less than 100, am I right? So then, that 60 drop in morale might be reduced to a 30-40 drop, if not less. Then, my 35 reserve would allow me to stay at what, 95?

Valid points.

I certainly wouldn't want to get this prematurely implemented without thinking of the consequences because it's something I just thought about on the fly and is not well-thought out obviously.

Originally posted by sjmay
Hey Bort/Catch,

Any idea on what would constitute a players expected salary?

Figured since we have a productive thread going, we can push it further

Think I got missed lol

Originally posted by Bort
You'd really get rid of the perm bonuses? I can see getting rid of deterioration, but only having the temp bonuses means you have to worry about buying them constantly.

Yeah, I like the Perm bonuses....and tbh I didnt mind deterioration.....but whatev makes the system work....Just would rather not see the day when a team has EVERY perm bonus bought.....they should have to work for it w/ Deterioration...but MINOR detail

Originally posted by sjmay
Hey Bort/Catch,

Any idea on what would constitute a players expected salary?

Figured since we have a productive thread going, we can push it further

HIs position and level

The original plan's idea was to compare to other players at the same position in the league.