Originally posted by Galactic Empire
That and run block awareness.
RBA is 40+ across the board
That and run block awareness.
RBA is 40+ across the board
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Season 17 Vet Discussion - Madcow talking to Madcow
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kayoh
RBA is 40+ across the board
I'm the last person you should take advice from:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/186733
Both teams combined for -8.5 yards rushing.
Time for roster changes!
RBA is 40+ across the board
I'm the last person you should take advice from:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/186733
Both teams combined for -8.5 yards rushing.
Time for roster changes!
Edited by Galactic Empire on May 31, 2015 14:57:48
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
I don't have a pure running team so maybe I'm just unfamiliar with the concept - but in my experience I would think that a slow-built run-blocking WR would get about as much run block tech as a pure run-block TE - without the OOP penalty? If the TE takes blocking specialist they become more expensive salary-wise than the WR as well I think.
I'm probably wrong on this since every team seems to want to run blocking TEs at the WR spot - but it just seems a little odd to me. Has Bort or Corndog ever come out and say what the OOP is for TEs playing at WR?
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
I don't have a pure running team so maybe I'm just unfamiliar with the concept - but in my experience I would think that a slow-built run-blocking WR would get about as much run block tech as a pure run-block TE - without the OOP penalty? If the TE takes blocking specialist they become more expensive salary-wise than the WR as well I think.
I'm probably wrong on this since every team seems to want to run blocking TEs at the WR spot - but it just seems a little odd to me. Has Bort or Corndog ever come out and say what the OOP is for TEs playing at WR?
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
Edited by Galactic Empire on May 31, 2015 15:38:00
Edited by Galactic Empire on May 31, 2015 15:37:09
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
You expect two rookie players to help you significantly?
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
You expect two rookie players to help you significantly?
Lokiness
offline
offline
"I have a big problem, let's make it even worse"
Dude you have 2 rookies with 0 chemistry and we are at game 11 when players that moved during offseason are around 75 chemistry, these 2 rookies with 0 chemistry vs sophomore with 75 or 100 chemistry are going to be useless.
You could (should) have made these changes next off season.
At this point I think I would cut the 2 rookies and give a high contracts to more players. Genuine advice.
Dude you have 2 rookies with 0 chemistry and we are at game 11 when players that moved during offseason are around 75 chemistry, these 2 rookies with 0 chemistry vs sophomore with 75 or 100 chemistry are going to be useless.
You could (should) have made these changes next off season.
At this point I think I would cut the 2 rookies and give a high contracts to more players. Genuine advice.
Edited by Lokiness on May 31, 2015 16:05:47
Edited by Lokiness on May 31, 2015 16:03:58
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
I'm the last person you should take advice from:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/186733
Both teams combined for -8.5 yards rushing.
Time for roster changes!
39 Punts!!
Has to be a record...
I'm the last person you should take advice from:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/186733
Both teams combined for -8.5 yards rushing.
Time for roster changes!
39 Punts!!
Has to be a record...
Danthesportsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xars
39 Punts!!
Has to be a record...
Probably. The Mannheim vs. Omaha game that resulted in 14.5 total net yards of offense only had 23 punts.
39 Punts!!
Has to be a record...
Probably. The Mannheim vs. Omaha game that resulted in 14.5 total net yards of offense only had 23 punts.
Absolut Zero
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
What? You retired the LB you cut instead of putting him on a CPU team? Why not keep the LB around and see if you need him later? Costs zero flex to be patient, and he would've leveled with your team.
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
What? You retired the LB you cut instead of putting him on a CPU team? Why not keep the LB around and see if you need him later? Costs zero flex to be patient, and he would've leveled with your team.
ValiantArcher
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
*cough*3-7 because of the offense*cough*
After tieing a 3-7 team, 0-0 today, I can't watch this crap anymore. So I cut a LB and added a blocking WR and OT (although they are a tier behind). Gave them high contracts as well as high contracts to 2 of my TEs. This depth better help significantly.
*cough*3-7 because of the offense*cough*
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lokiness
"I have a big problem, let's make it even worse"
Dude you have 2 rookies with 0 chemistry and we are at game 11 when players that moved during offseason are around 75 chemistry, these 2 rookies with 0 chemistry vs sophomore with 75 or 100 chemistry are going to be useless.
You could (should) have made these changes next off season.
At this point I think I would cut the 2 rookies and give a high contracts to more players. Genuine advice.
It's not as bad as you put it. The cut LB wasn't a key player. The 2 new guys will serve as depth and rest my TEs and O Line.
"I have a big problem, let's make it even worse"
Dude you have 2 rookies with 0 chemistry and we are at game 11 when players that moved during offseason are around 75 chemistry, these 2 rookies with 0 chemistry vs sophomore with 75 or 100 chemistry are going to be useless.
You could (should) have made these changes next off season.
At this point I think I would cut the 2 rookies and give a high contracts to more players. Genuine advice.
It's not as bad as you put it. The cut LB wasn't a key player. The 2 new guys will serve as depth and rest my TEs and O Line.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
