User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
another joke.

pocket caught like 61%, nothing special.

the top of the HOF for WRs is just WRs who get a few hundred targets per sesaon.


He has taken over a lot of games on his own. What is funny is that even moving him around hasn't stopped Winn from finding him.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Oh yeah your WRs are very good, but usually never is the #1 HOF player the best, they were just put in the best situation for stats
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Well then shouldn't more WR's be putting up those kind of numbers if it is that easy?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
I might have a distorted view of what best means. But to me Doinitin is the best team in GLB and Hands in Pocket looks to be the best WR out there right except maybe Cobb.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Well then shouldn't more WR's be putting up those kind of numbers if it is that easy?


Especially putting up those kind of numbers while playing top 10 teams every other game.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Well then shouldn't more WR's be putting up those kind of numbers if it is that easy?


Not that many WRs are getting hundreds of passes a season. so no.

I'm not saying Pocket is not one of the best WRs in glb, but the best? nah, you won't find the best in a system like SF or OG.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
The absolute best WRs are in a system that doesn't pass that often.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Ah it all makes sense now. You can't be considered the best if you catch passes.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
The absolute best WRs are in a system that doesn't pass that often.


The absolute best WRs don't put up any stats. They are so good they don't have to get receiving yards and TDs. They just get to be the best because jampy says so without any actual argument to back up his claims.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Yeah, I mean that's how you know they're good, they don't even bother to put up stats or impact their team much at all.

You just know.
Edited by Corndog on May 14, 2014 15:39:48
 
TxSteve
Not A Mod
offline
Link
 
Best receiver in the game last season? 67% reception rate.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/56491
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
I mean it would be one thing if we were like a mid to lower ranked team putting up stats for the hell of it and losing I could see an argument for it being kinda lol. But ya that obviously isn't the case and it isn't even like I am being sneaky about my gameplans at all either.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Or because the overused WRs will be tired, and you can find better stats from less used WRs (maybe cut the season targets in half?)

Maybe In the mid 50s of the ladder where everyone is getting similar #s of targets producing completely different stats.

Because Ringin throws hundreds of passes doesn't mean he is the best QB does he? Cuz the way you guys are mocking if a player isn't getting abused hes not the best.

 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TxSteve
Best receiver in the game last season? 67% reception rate.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/56491


No sample size you mongrel
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Signs would say yes, Ringin does appear to be the consensus #1 QB in GLB2 over 3 seasons.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.