Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Nuge20
btw GG Dakar, cant stop McGee
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=979937&pbp_id=15300134

Surprised he didn't run towards the sidelines after hitting the second level...

GG Dakar.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by Nuge20

btw GG Dakar, cant stop McGee
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=979937&pbp_id=15300134

Surprised he didn't run towards the sidelines after hitting the second level...

GG Dakar.

I was about to say, the only way he doesnt go toward the sideline is if he is in the exact center of the field because with his vision he cant see the sidelines from there

Originally posted by blln4lyf
Wow, GG Valhalla .

You guys did a good job tagging us etc. (and here was me expecting you to stay with the base AI) but it really came down to that passing game..even with 2/3 guys in position it seemed like an auto catch nearly all game long.

Really? This game determined pretty much #1 seed and a guarantee trophy in the addicts tournament and you didnt think they would try?

IMO sorta a weak excuse.

Originally posted by Stobie
Originally posted by blln4lyf

Wow, GG Valhalla .

You guys did a good job tagging us etc. (and here was me expecting you to stay with the base AI) but it really came down to that passing game..even with 2/3 guys in position it seemed like an auto catch nearly all game long.

Really? This game determined pretty much #1 seed and a guarantee trophy in the addicts tournament and you didnt think they would try?

IMO sorta a weak excuse.

Of course I expected them to try, but to this point it looked like all their changes were very small. This game they went bigger than I expected and it took me by surprise. Sort of a weak call out IMO.

Besides, we lost b.c we couldn't stop the passing game, not because they tagged us etc. We would of lost that game had they done nothing imo.

gg Dakar
gg Lincoln

Originally posted by blln4lyf

Besides, we lost b.c we couldn't stop the passing game, not because they tagged us etc. We would of lost that game had they done nothing imo.

The passing yardage was impressive but 51% completion rate, 2 interceptions (one a 70 yard TD), and 6 punts leaves some room for your offense to sneak in. I think the defense was a bigger factor and we probably would have lost without any changes. Who really knows though.

GG either way. I have a feeling we shall meet again.

Originally posted by w_alloy
Originally posted by blln4lyf


Besides, we lost b.c we couldn't stop the passing game, not because they tagged us etc. We would of lost that game had they done nothing imo.

The passing yardage was impressive but 51% completion rate, 2 interceptions (one a 70 yard TD), and 6 punts leaves some room for your offense to sneak in. I think the defense was a bigger factor and we probably would have lost without any changes. Who really knows though.

GG either way. I have a feeling we shall meet again.

I agree, but it is a defensive sim imo and our O did enough to have beaten any other team we had matched up with this season. The main thing that held our offense back was your defensive's ability to swarm but also not miss tackles. The amount of times I am used to seeing a missed tackle but didn't this game was disturbing. The passing game did not look too impressive with the 51% completion rate, but the passing game extended more than enough drives to get an easy win in a defensive sim.

If you think you would of lost without any changes then I'll trust your opinion and I look forward to a hopeful rematch in the playoffs.

Originally posted by coachviking
GG Krungthep

GG MEM

Originally posted by blln4lyf
Originally posted by w_alloy

Originally posted by blln4lyf



Besides, we lost b.c we couldn't stop the passing game, not because they tagged us etc. We would of lost that game had they done nothing imo.

The passing yardage was impressive but 51% completion rate, 2 interceptions (one a 70 yard TD), and 6 punts leaves some room for your offense to sneak in. I think the defense was a bigger factor and we probably would have lost without any changes. Who really knows though.

GG either way. I have a feeling we shall meet again.

I agree, but it is a defensive sim imo and our O did enough to have beaten any other team we had matched up with this season. The main thing that held our offense back was your defensive's ability to swarm but also not miss tackles. The amount of times I am used to seeing a missed tackle but didn't this game was disturbing. The passing game did not look too impressive with the 51% completion rate, but the passing game extended more than enough drives to get an easy win in a defensive sim.

If you think you would of lost without any changes then I'll trust your opinion and I look forward to a hopeful rematch in the playoffs.

5 TFLs on Sleazy, and still only 9 broken tackles in 18 rushes. That is quite impressive.

GG Gunners

GG Team Korb... we needed that one and it took a long time for that one to be decided.

Originally posted by tautology

5 TFLs on Sleazy, and still only 9 broken tackles in 18 rushes. That is quite impressive.



rng ftw imo

GG Gunners. Hard fought one that was even on yardage but we just got an extra big play or two. You guys still have a shot of the playoffs by running the table and getting some help i think. You definitely should go all out against the Rams week 16

SCREW YOU SPARTA........just kidding guys (I have some players on their baby sparta team) GG