Originally posted by jkid2
I meant after looking at the game. Before the game I wasn't sure at all, so I boosted to guarantee that. I just am saying that after looking over the game, I think I would have won anyway. However, I couldn't have known that in advance, which is why I boosted.
Bit of a bold statement saying you would have won Jkid. I am not here to argue who would have won if you did not boost, nor do I care, but your statement is uncalled for. I gave you a gg b/c you won and was a good game.
There is nothing tangible saying you would have won still, but you have players 3 levels higher then me. Saying you would have won any ways is a bit of a joke.
I locked down your passing. You threw 15/37 and 4 of your completions came after I deflected it, and several were caught in double coverage. Let's say for shits and giggles you would have been 10/37 if you were at our level. Your running I defended well on when you rushed in the middle. Your toss/sweep runs my safties did not have enough vision and they stood there while you ran by them on the outside. Granted I did not have them set up to blitz but being 3 levels higher then me, your RB's are faster and more agile and my safties lack vision (which they would have had if they were L11).
You had a pick 6 and 2 TD's from special teams due to being 3 complete levels higher then my players.
your offense did not look that good, your defense looked good.
Your DE's were way too agile for our O-linemen to handle, 3 boosts shined there. You sacked us 8 times. Fat Chicks have been sacked 8 times total before this game. I guarantee that is at least top 3 in the league. Again, those 3 boosts helped a ton when talking cutting off my QB progression ticks and my o-linemen not at 11 like your DE's.
Not here to argue who would have won if you did not boost, I just want to point out your comment should not have been said. This is the only time I am commenting on this. None the less, gg Jkid you played a great game buddy.
Dan
