Originally posted by crawlins
GG The Other Guys
U2 - very good dots you guys have there
GG The Other Guys
U2 - very good dots you guys have there
Forum > University Leagues > Season 32 University Elite #1
Rank ... OFF ... DEF ... S.o.S. ........ W-L-T Team
1.. ........ 2 ........ 6 ........ 0.542 ........ 11-1.... Johannesburg Jackals
2.. ........ 3 ........ 2 ........ 0.451 ........ 12-0.... Fort Worth Texans
3.. ...... 10 ........ 5 ........ 0.542 ........ 9-3...... The Other Guys
4.. ...... 20 ........ 9 ........ 0.521 ........ 10-2.... Chesapeake Panthers
5.. ........ 1 ........ 3 ........ 0.514 ........ 11-1.... Mentone Beach Chiefs
6.. ........ 9 ........ 1 ........ 0.507 ........ 9-2-1.. Border Reivers
7.. ........ 4 ........ 4 ........ 0.438 ........ 9-2-1.. Monster Madness 2013
8.. ...... 25 ...... 15 ........ 0.611 ........ 6-6...... Winnipeg Wrath
9.. ........ 5 ...... 14 ........ 0.438 ........ 8-4...... HTTR 24/7
10 ...... 13 ...... 13 ........ 0.458 ........ 9-3...... Mayan Prophecy 2012
11 ........ 7 ...... 20 ........ 0.528 ........ 8-4...... Black & White Juventus
12 ........ 6 ...... 10 ........ 0.424 ........ 9-3...... North Side Mob
13 ...... 16 ...... 16 ........ 0.542 ........ 7-5...... Chicago Tadpoles
14 ........ 8 ...... 12 ........ 0.472 ........ 8-4...... Team Still In Beta
15 ...... 17 ...... 11 ........ 0.528 ........ 7-5...... Lima Vipers
16 ...... 11 ........ 7 ........ 0.410 ........ 7-5...... Sport City Chefs
17 ...... 21 ........ 8 ........ 0.493 ........ 6-6...... Legacy's Dotball Assassins
18 ...... 14 ...... 19 ........ 0.444 ........ 7-5...... Massive Dynamic
19 ...... 22 ...... 24 ........ 0.611 ........ 4-8...... Carteret Devil Dogs
20 ...... 15 ...... 18 ........ 0.528 ........ 5-7...... Chupa Cabras
21 ...... 18 ...... 17 ........ 0.431 ........ 6-6...... 8-Bit NES Heroes
22 ...... 19 ...... 25 ........ 0.493 ........ 5-7...... Devil's Lake Dotball Asylum
23 ...... 12 ...... 21 ........ 0.472 ........ 3-9...... Midnight Marauders
24 ...... 23 ...... 22 ........ 0.368 ........ 4-8...... Jersie Crushers
25 ...... 28 ...... 23 ........ 0.528 ........ 3-9...... Accidental Contenders
26 ...... 24 ...... 27 ........ 0.521 ........ 3-9...... Carolina Underground
27 ...... 26 ...... 26 ........ 0.479 ........ 3-9...... Ottawa Rulers
28 ...... 27 ...... 28 ........ 0.479 ........ 1-11.... Spartan Warriors
29 ...... 29 ...... 29 ........ 0.458 ........ 1-11.... Winterfell Direwolves
30 ...... 31 ...... 31 ........ 0.583 ........ 0-12.... Dotball Swag Champs
31 ...... 30 ...... 30 ........ 0.576 ........ 0-12.... Justice League Legomen Heroes
32 ...... 32 ...... 32 ........ 0.528 ........ 0-12.... Huntington Beach Cowboys
NEXT WEEK'S MATCHUPS
Exp Score Matchup
49 - 7 Mentone Beach Chiefs (11-1) def. Midnight Marauders (3-9)
131 - 0 Chesapeake Panthers (10-2) def. Dotball Swag Champs (0-12)
20 - 3 Border Reivers (9-2-1) def. 8-Bit NES Heroes (6-6)
16 - 6 Monster Madness 2013 (9-2-1) def. Legacy's Dotball Assassins (6-6)
25 - 10 North Side Mob (9-3) def. Massive Dynamic (7-5)
55 - 7 Team Still In Beta (8-4) def. Ottawa Rulers (3-9)
59 - 6 Lima Vipers (7-5) def. Spartan Warriors (1-11)
116 - 0 Devil's Lake Dotball Asylum (5-7) def. Justice League Legomen Heroes (0-12)
21 - 6 Fort Worth Texans (12-0) def. Mayan Prophecy 2012 (9-3)
46 - 7 Johannesburg Jackals (11-1) def. Jersie Crushers (4-8)
15 - 13 The Other Guys (9-3) def. HTTR 24/7 (8-4)
25 - 21 Black & White Juventus (8-4) def. Chupa Cabras (5-7)
28 - 7 Chicago Tadpoles (7-5) def. Accidental Contenders (3-9)
56 - 7 Sport City Chefs (7-5) def. Carolina Underground (3-9)
74 - 3 Winnipeg Wrath (6-6) def. Winterfell Direwolves (1-11)
146 - 0 Carteret Devil Dogs (4-8) def. Huntington Beach Cowboys (0-12)
Head-to-Head Fantasy matchup
Exp Score Matchup
11 - 10 Mentone Beach Chiefs (11-1) def. Fort Worth Texans (12-0)
1.. ........ 2 ........ 6 ........ 0.542 ........ 11-1.... Johannesburg Jackals
2.. ........ 3 ........ 2 ........ 0.451 ........ 12-0.... Fort Worth Texans
3.. ...... 10 ........ 5 ........ 0.542 ........ 9-3...... The Other Guys
4.. ...... 20 ........ 9 ........ 0.521 ........ 10-2.... Chesapeake Panthers
5.. ........ 1 ........ 3 ........ 0.514 ........ 11-1.... Mentone Beach Chiefs
6.. ........ 9 ........ 1 ........ 0.507 ........ 9-2-1.. Border Reivers
7.. ........ 4 ........ 4 ........ 0.438 ........ 9-2-1.. Monster Madness 2013
8.. ...... 25 ...... 15 ........ 0.611 ........ 6-6...... Winnipeg Wrath
9.. ........ 5 ...... 14 ........ 0.438 ........ 8-4...... HTTR 24/7
10 ...... 13 ...... 13 ........ 0.458 ........ 9-3...... Mayan Prophecy 2012
11 ........ 7 ...... 20 ........ 0.528 ........ 8-4...... Black & White Juventus
12 ........ 6 ...... 10 ........ 0.424 ........ 9-3...... North Side Mob
13 ...... 16 ...... 16 ........ 0.542 ........ 7-5...... Chicago Tadpoles
14 ........ 8 ...... 12 ........ 0.472 ........ 8-4...... Team Still In Beta
15 ...... 17 ...... 11 ........ 0.528 ........ 7-5...... Lima Vipers
16 ...... 11 ........ 7 ........ 0.410 ........ 7-5...... Sport City Chefs
17 ...... 21 ........ 8 ........ 0.493 ........ 6-6...... Legacy's Dotball Assassins
18 ...... 14 ...... 19 ........ 0.444 ........ 7-5...... Massive Dynamic
19 ...... 22 ...... 24 ........ 0.611 ........ 4-8...... Carteret Devil Dogs
20 ...... 15 ...... 18 ........ 0.528 ........ 5-7...... Chupa Cabras
21 ...... 18 ...... 17 ........ 0.431 ........ 6-6...... 8-Bit NES Heroes
22 ...... 19 ...... 25 ........ 0.493 ........ 5-7...... Devil's Lake Dotball Asylum
23 ...... 12 ...... 21 ........ 0.472 ........ 3-9...... Midnight Marauders
24 ...... 23 ...... 22 ........ 0.368 ........ 4-8...... Jersie Crushers
25 ...... 28 ...... 23 ........ 0.528 ........ 3-9...... Accidental Contenders
26 ...... 24 ...... 27 ........ 0.521 ........ 3-9...... Carolina Underground
27 ...... 26 ...... 26 ........ 0.479 ........ 3-9...... Ottawa Rulers
28 ...... 27 ...... 28 ........ 0.479 ........ 1-11.... Spartan Warriors
29 ...... 29 ...... 29 ........ 0.458 ........ 1-11.... Winterfell Direwolves
30 ...... 31 ...... 31 ........ 0.583 ........ 0-12.... Dotball Swag Champs
31 ...... 30 ...... 30 ........ 0.576 ........ 0-12.... Justice League Legomen Heroes
32 ...... 32 ...... 32 ........ 0.528 ........ 0-12.... Huntington Beach Cowboys
NEXT WEEK'S MATCHUPS
Exp Score Matchup
49 - 7 Mentone Beach Chiefs (11-1) def. Midnight Marauders (3-9)
131 - 0 Chesapeake Panthers (10-2) def. Dotball Swag Champs (0-12)
20 - 3 Border Reivers (9-2-1) def. 8-Bit NES Heroes (6-6)
16 - 6 Monster Madness 2013 (9-2-1) def. Legacy's Dotball Assassins (6-6)
25 - 10 North Side Mob (9-3) def. Massive Dynamic (7-5)
55 - 7 Team Still In Beta (8-4) def. Ottawa Rulers (3-9)
59 - 6 Lima Vipers (7-5) def. Spartan Warriors (1-11)
116 - 0 Devil's Lake Dotball Asylum (5-7) def. Justice League Legomen Heroes (0-12)
21 - 6 Fort Worth Texans (12-0) def. Mayan Prophecy 2012 (9-3)
46 - 7 Johannesburg Jackals (11-1) def. Jersie Crushers (4-8)
15 - 13 The Other Guys (9-3) def. HTTR 24/7 (8-4)
25 - 21 Black & White Juventus (8-4) def. Chupa Cabras (5-7)
28 - 7 Chicago Tadpoles (7-5) def. Accidental Contenders (3-9)
56 - 7 Sport City Chefs (7-5) def. Carolina Underground (3-9)
74 - 3 Winnipeg Wrath (6-6) def. Winterfell Direwolves (1-11)
146 - 0 Carteret Devil Dogs (4-8) def. Huntington Beach Cowboys (0-12)
Head-to-Head Fantasy matchup
Exp Score Matchup
11 - 10 Mentone Beach Chiefs (11-1) def. Fort Worth Texans (12-0)
Originally posted by dsl20
How in the hell is Ft. Worth not number 1? GG script.
The script is very heavy on SoS, but I'm not sure where it gets that information from.
How in the hell is Ft. Worth not number 1? GG script.
The script is very heavy on SoS, but I'm not sure where it gets that information from.
armadafalls
offline
offline
Because the ranking script is heavy on SoS, Fort Worth is temporarily "punished" because it does not have the only undefeated team (Ft. Worth 12-0) on its schedule and all of the teams that Fort Worth plays on its schedule have at least one loss.Where as every other team that plays Fort Worth receives the temporary "benefit" of having a schedule that includes an undefeated team.
If the ranking script placed less emphasis on SoS and more on win-loss record then Fort Worth would be ranked number one. But that does not mean that jpjn94 is using a bad script. I like the ranking script that jpjn94 is using because that ranking script is very useful in comparing teams in two separate conferences. If we were just ranking one conference we could throw SoS completely out the window and just rely on win-loss record and offensive and defensive rankings because all teams would essentially have the same teams on their schedule. But since we are comparing all teams on two separate schedules, SoS should be heavily weighted in the ranking script.
If, for example, all of the truly talented teams ended up in one conference or another, then it would not be as impressive if one team went undefeated. 16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
If the ranking script placed less emphasis on SoS and more on win-loss record then Fort Worth would be ranked number one. But that does not mean that jpjn94 is using a bad script. I like the ranking script that jpjn94 is using because that ranking script is very useful in comparing teams in two separate conferences. If we were just ranking one conference we could throw SoS completely out the window and just rely on win-loss record and offensive and defensive rankings because all teams would essentially have the same teams on their schedule. But since we are comparing all teams on two separate schedules, SoS should be heavily weighted in the ranking script.
If, for example, all of the truly talented teams ended up in one conference or another, then it would not be as impressive if one team went undefeated. 16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
Edited by armadafalls on Jan 3, 2013 04:11:25
Mentone Beach Chiefs over Black & White Juventus 58 - 7
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2248325
GG B&W GG
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2248325
GG B&W GG
Pnthrz1
offline
offline
Originally posted by armadafalls
Because the ranking script is heavy on SoS, Fort Worth is temporarily "punished" because it does not have the only undefeated team (Ft. Worth 12-0) on its schedule and all of the teams that Fort Worth plays on its schedule have at least one loss.Where as every other team that plays Fort Worth receives the temporary "benefit" of having a schedule that includes an undefeated team.
If the ranking script placed less emphasis on SoS and more on win-loss record then Fort Worth would be ranked number one. But that does not mean that jpjn94 is using a bad script. I like the ranking script that jpjn94 is using because that ranking script is very useful in comparing teams in two separate conferences. If we were just ranking one conference we could throw SoS completely out the window and just rely on win-loss record and offensive and defensive rankings because all teams would essentially have the same teams on their schedule. But since we are comparing all teams on two separate schedules, SoS should be heavily weighted in the ranking script.
If, for example, all of the truly talented teams ended up in one conference or another, then it would not be as impressive if one team went undefeated. 16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
What he said. Good Analysis.
Because the ranking script is heavy on SoS, Fort Worth is temporarily "punished" because it does not have the only undefeated team (Ft. Worth 12-0) on its schedule and all of the teams that Fort Worth plays on its schedule have at least one loss.Where as every other team that plays Fort Worth receives the temporary "benefit" of having a schedule that includes an undefeated team.
If the ranking script placed less emphasis on SoS and more on win-loss record then Fort Worth would be ranked number one. But that does not mean that jpjn94 is using a bad script. I like the ranking script that jpjn94 is using because that ranking script is very useful in comparing teams in two separate conferences. If we were just ranking one conference we could throw SoS completely out the window and just rely on win-loss record and offensive and defensive rankings because all teams would essentially have the same teams on their schedule. But since we are comparing all teams on two separate schedules, SoS should be heavily weighted in the ranking script.
If, for example, all of the truly talented teams ended up in one conference or another, then it would not be as impressive if one team went undefeated. 16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
What he said. Good Analysis.
Pnthrz1
offline
offline
I think the Panthers are done. Without an OC worth a darn, we're a one and done team in the playoffs. 
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
dsl20
offline
offline
Good run in the tournament John Gray. You run a very good team. Good luck in the league playoffs.
sanmantodd
offline
offline
Originally posted by Pnthrz1
I think the Panthers are done. Without an OC worth a darn, we're a one and done team in the playoffs.
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
If it were only that easy. I feel like we are hitting our stride but the playoffs are a different story. The 3rd game with themob will show me where we really are, they are really tough.
I think the Panthers are done. Without an OC worth a darn, we're a one and done team in the playoffs.
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
If it were only that easy. I feel like we are hitting our stride but the playoffs are a different story. The 3rd game with themob will show me where we really are, they are really tough.
Originally posted by armadafalls
16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
I didn't get a chance to read all this when I logged in this morning, but I do agree with all of this; I was merely pointing out why some teams are ranked in different areas. Clearly the Jackals shouldn't be on top, but they are in the weaker conference
16 victories against a bunch of 8-8 teams by the leader of one conference is not as impressive as a 12-4 record against a bunch of 11-5 and 10-6 teams in another completely separate conference. So if you are comparing teams in two separate conferences, that dont play against each other in the regular season, then adding a SoS component is crucial to weighing the overall value of any particular team and ranking that value against teams in separate conferences.
I didn't get a chance to read all this when I logged in this morning, but I do agree with all of this; I was merely pointing out why some teams are ranked in different areas. Clearly the Jackals shouldn't be on top, but they are in the weaker conference
Originally posted by sanmantodd
If it were only that easy. I feel like we are hitting our stride but the playoffs are a different story. The 3rd game with themob will show me where we really are, they are really tough.
You're supposed to be game planning for the one and done playoff team; not talking to the in the forums! DCs
If it were only that easy. I feel like we are hitting our stride but the playoffs are a different story. The 3rd game with themob will show me where we really are, they are really tough.
You're supposed to be game planning for the one and done playoff team; not talking to the in the forums! DCs
Originally posted by Pnthrz1
I think the Panthers are done. Without an OC worth a darn, we're a one and done team in the playoffs.
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
OCing is a lot easier than you think; I mean I'm successful at it and I'm drunk most of the time I'm game planning
I think the Panthers are done. Without an OC worth a darn, we're a one and done team in the playoffs.
Congrats, in advance, to the Chiefs for winning Gold this season.
OCing is a lot easier than you think; I mean I'm successful at it and I'm drunk most of the time I'm game planning
Originally posted by dsl20
Good run in the tournament John Gray. You run a very good team. Good luck in the league playoffs.
Wow very impressive win!!!! They are a tough team; I'm looking forward to our matchup
See what I did there was not tell you which team we're going to matchup with because I hate playing the stupid North Side Mob that doesn't let me score a bunch of points on them. BASTARDS!!!!
I mean... "Good Luck!!!"
Good run in the tournament John Gray. You run a very good team. Good luck in the league playoffs.
Wow very impressive win!!!! They are a tough team; I'm looking forward to our matchup
See what I did there was not tell you which team we're going to matchup with because I hate playing the stupid North Side Mob that doesn't let me score a bunch of points on them. BASTARDS!!!!
I mean... "Good Luck!!!"
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
