Originally posted by Phil Jackson
This is complete horseshit, your opinions are laughable. Trying to call a 6'0 WR short is ridiculous. The average wide receiver is
over 6'0". Now if we were talking about the general population of the United States, then sure, 6'0" would not be considered "short." In the NFL, it is, just as 6'4" would be considered short in the NBA.
Originally posted by
Your argument fails. I don't think there is a person in the planet who would say Height doesn't help a WR. It may not hurt someone, but it can always help.Actually, no. Height can often be a hindrance for positions that require quick changes of direction, as the higher center of gravity makes it more difficult to sustain speed and balance. If you ask me what kind of receiver I want to run a fade route from the opponent's 10 yard line, then sure, I'd want someone 6'4"+. But wide receivers have more responsibilities than just that, which is why being short can actually be an advantage in other roles.
Originally posted by
I'm just arguing with chubby fantasy football star that thinks he deserves a slot on the NFL Network. Guess what? No one gives a fuck about what your double-chinned gullet flopping up and down has to say.I think you're projecting. Just because you got turned away by Jenny Craig as a hopeless case that even they couldn't fix doesn't mean that everyone else is a bloated whale. Ultimately, though, we'll always come back to the fact that I actually have a reason for being here. You don't. You're posting in this forum because you service someone who services someone else who actually has a reason for being here.