GG Samoa FF, you jumped out ahead early and made us fight for every inch.
darrengd
offline
offline
Originally posted by CinTex
GG Pittsburg you played up to your namesake today...
Good game to you guys (N.M.I) Pagan Fire Eaters.
The way our season has been going I am surprised we won. So I will agree we stole that one
Good luck the rest of the way.
GG Pittsburg you played up to your namesake today...
Good game to you guys (N.M.I) Pagan Fire Eaters.
The way our season has been going I am surprised we won. So I will agree we stole that one
Good luck the rest of the way.Edited by darrengd on Sep 6, 2009 18:06:08
jprietman
offline
offline
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
Yeah, right. GG. Those fucking centers at LG, oh my. Can't wait until Borat makes the coach who can reduce their OOP penalty, then maybe they'll pull their weight for you. *big fucking rolleyes*
wow. is this a serious post?
Yeah, right. GG. Those fucking centers at LG, oh my. Can't wait until Borat makes the coach who can reduce their OOP penalty, then maybe they'll pull their weight for you. *big fucking rolleyes*
wow. is this a serious post?
notgoing2argue
offline
offline
Originally posted by jprietman
wow. is this a serious post?
I probably should have separated my thoughts a bit there. Sorry about that, I forgot there is always somebody looking for a chip to put on their shoulder. Seriously, no slight intended. We got destroyed, GG on your part, sorry we could give you a good game. Just not strong enough of a team to compete with what Tasmania is brining this season.
So, the first part wasn't serious. It was my light-hearted way of saying yeah we got the shit kicked out of us and it wasn't a good game for us at all. I know NeoDR was being a good sport with the obligatory GG. But after you lose 62-6 or whatever it was, it's hard to take GG seriously - in a literal sense. I'm not sure anybody gameplanned much because we knew what was coming. You could sim that game 500 times and we'd probably never win one with thehazyone gameplanning for us.
The second part is an observation of one of the many reasons for Tasmania's dominance in this game. I noticed the center's at LG because my DT got pancaked 17 times, haha. I don't think I've ever seen him pancaked more than 4 in any game, hence the "Those fucking centers at LG, oh my." Lions, Tigers, and Bears kind of Oh my!
The last part is pure sarcasm, which is why I threw in a *big fucking rolleyes* at the end. I'm personally not looking forward to seeing a trend of Cs at LG/RG, DEs at LB, FBs as power HBs once Borat makes his coach that can lessen the OOP penalty. It would be inevitable that everyone would lean towards those exploits because of the massive level gains to those positions' most important attributes. I suspect you would also see Gs at OT since they can shop for a Protector piece of AEQ and get better strength and blocking level ups. It's all about getting more strength than the opposing line. And, an Oline with G C C C G would dominate your basic DE DT DT DE line with a marginalized OOP penality. You know that, which is why you guys are running with centers at guard. Kudos for having the players to do it. They've smashed the shit out of everyone in the league and that sets up Tasmania a trend setter.
wow. is this a serious post?
I probably should have separated my thoughts a bit there. Sorry about that, I forgot there is always somebody looking for a chip to put on their shoulder. Seriously, no slight intended. We got destroyed, GG on your part, sorry we could give you a good game. Just not strong enough of a team to compete with what Tasmania is brining this season.
So, the first part wasn't serious. It was my light-hearted way of saying yeah we got the shit kicked out of us and it wasn't a good game for us at all. I know NeoDR was being a good sport with the obligatory GG. But after you lose 62-6 or whatever it was, it's hard to take GG seriously - in a literal sense. I'm not sure anybody gameplanned much because we knew what was coming. You could sim that game 500 times and we'd probably never win one with thehazyone gameplanning for us.
The second part is an observation of one of the many reasons for Tasmania's dominance in this game. I noticed the center's at LG because my DT got pancaked 17 times, haha. I don't think I've ever seen him pancaked more than 4 in any game, hence the "Those fucking centers at LG, oh my." Lions, Tigers, and Bears kind of Oh my!
The last part is pure sarcasm, which is why I threw in a *big fucking rolleyes* at the end. I'm personally not looking forward to seeing a trend of Cs at LG/RG, DEs at LB, FBs as power HBs once Borat makes his coach that can lessen the OOP penalty. It would be inevitable that everyone would lean towards those exploits because of the massive level gains to those positions' most important attributes. I suspect you would also see Gs at OT since they can shop for a Protector piece of AEQ and get better strength and blocking level ups. It's all about getting more strength than the opposing line. And, an Oline with G C C C G would dominate your basic DE DT DT DE line with a marginalized OOP penality. You know that, which is why you guys are running with centers at guard. Kudos for having the players to do it. They've smashed the shit out of everyone in the league and that sets up Tasmania a trend setter.
irresistible_force
offline
offline
Originally posted by eZe471
GG Micronesia, we definitely weren't up to the task today. Good luck the rest of the season.
GG to you Vipers!!! It was back and forth the whole game. You have a great team!!!!!
GG Micronesia, we definitely weren't up to the task today. Good luck the rest of the season.
GG to you Vipers!!! It was back and forth the whole game. You have a great team!!!!!
Kevin Smith
offline
offline
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
The last part is pure sarcasm, which is why I threw in a *big fucking rolleyes* at the end. I'm personally not looking forward to seeing a trend of Cs at LG/RG, DEs at LB, FBs as power HBs once Borat makes his coach that can lessen the OOP penalty. It would be inevitable that everyone would lean towards those exploits because of the massive level gains to those positions' most important attributes. I suspect you would also see Gs at OT since they can shop for a Protector piece of AEQ and get better strength and blocking level ups. It's all about getting more strength than the opposing line. And, an Oline with G C C C G would dominate your basic DE DT DT DE line with a marginalized OOP penality. You know that, which is why you guys are running with centers at guard. Kudos for having the players to do it. They've smashed the shit out of everyone in the league and that sets up Tasmania a trend setter.
FBs as power backs is going to huge if that gets implemented. I am kinda hoping for it because my level 42 would be unstoppable. The OOPP for them is not that big (unlike, say, HBs at QB) so they will be getting very close to zero OOPP. And there´s no way HBs can compete with their natural gains. Plus Power Thru, the best power SA, comes cheaper for FBs than for HBs. DEs and/or SSs at LB would be another one, but if the coaches can only do one player, the easiest/biggest gain will be from coaching your running FB.
The last part is pure sarcasm, which is why I threw in a *big fucking rolleyes* at the end. I'm personally not looking forward to seeing a trend of Cs at LG/RG, DEs at LB, FBs as power HBs once Borat makes his coach that can lessen the OOP penalty. It would be inevitable that everyone would lean towards those exploits because of the massive level gains to those positions' most important attributes. I suspect you would also see Gs at OT since they can shop for a Protector piece of AEQ and get better strength and blocking level ups. It's all about getting more strength than the opposing line. And, an Oline with G C C C G would dominate your basic DE DT DT DE line with a marginalized OOP penality. You know that, which is why you guys are running with centers at guard. Kudos for having the players to do it. They've smashed the shit out of everyone in the league and that sets up Tasmania a trend setter.
FBs as power backs is going to huge if that gets implemented. I am kinda hoping for it
because my level 42 would be unstoppable. The OOPP for them is not that big (unlike, say, HBs at QB) so they will be getting very close to zero OOPP. And there´s no way HBs can compete with their natural gains. Plus Power Thru, the best power SA, comes cheaper for FBs than for HBs. DEs and/or SSs at LB would be another one, but if the coaches can only do one player, the easiest/biggest gain will be from coaching your running FB.Edited by Kevin Smith on Sep 7, 2009 05:49:48
Kevin Smith
offline
offline
And I get the no-GG comment. Been on both sides of that coin enough to know that you feel silly saying GG when you know it wasn´t, whether you were the blower-out or the blowee-out.
NeoDR
offline
offline
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
deleted on purpose, so this post wasn't huge
I understood all of that without you having to post your thoughts bud, I just felt it poor sport to not say anything when I know you guys are a quality squad and good guys. Thanks for the explanation though and I agree...it's very tough to matchup against our Centers at both RG and LG, not to mention our Centers playing as Centers
Good luck the rest of the way!
deleted on purpose, so this post wasn't huge
I understood all of that without you having to post your thoughts bud, I just felt it poor sport to not say anything when I know you guys are a quality squad and good guys. Thanks for the explanation though and I agree...it's very tough to matchup against our Centers at both RG and LG, not to mention our Centers playing as Centers
Good luck the rest of the way!
thekegcans
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigr925
Good job Perth...
single most frustrating game for me to watch this season.
Good game VV. I enjoyed it after going 0-2 against you guys last season.
Good job Perth...
single most frustrating game for me to watch this season.
Good game VV. I enjoyed it after going 0-2 against you guys last season.
johnbarber
offline
offline
Originally posted by NeoDR
I understood all of that without you having to post your thoughts bud, I just felt it poor sport to not say anything when I know you guys are a quality squad and good guys. Thanks for the explanation though and I agree...it's very tough to matchup against our Centers at both RG and LG, not to mention our Centers playing as Centers
Good luck the rest of the way!
It's doable, there's ways to negate any advantage. This is not the creampuff Pro's, know your enemy and fight it tooth and nail.
I understood all of that without you having to post your thoughts bud, I just felt it poor sport to not say anything when I know you guys are a quality squad and good guys. Thanks for the explanation though and I agree...it's very tough to matchup against our Centers at both RG and LG, not to mention our Centers playing as Centers
Good luck the rest of the way!
It's doable, there's ways to negate any advantage. This is not the creampuff Pro's, know your enemy and fight it tooth and nail.
notgoing2argue
offline
offline
Originally posted by johnbarber
It's doable, there's ways to negate any advantage. This is not the creampuff Pro's, know your enemy and fight it tooth and nail.
Yup. It's called another season of boosts for my S3 DT. Normally, he does alriight against C's while playing the NT position, but this game was something else. Too big of a level gap to close against a well-built player.
It's doable, there's ways to negate any advantage. This is not the creampuff Pro's, know your enemy and fight it tooth and nail.
Yup. It's called another season of boosts for my S3 DT. Normally, he does alriight against C's while playing the NT position, but this game was something else. Too big of a level gap to close against a well-built player.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
