User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
bongbreath
offline
Link
 
I GM Hammerfest, last year we would lose by a 100 or win by a 100, there couldn't have been a worse league as far as imbalance.

Bort should make sure we all have a fair shot to win, let player builds and strategy decide the champion.

What ever we had last year was a complete joke and as long as it gets fixed, I'm all for it.

Side note, Bort asked for a vote and this thread turned into a childish pissing match, thanks for making this thread unreadable children, you should have voted and allowed the process to work itself out.
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 05:44:26
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JcWildcat
LOL I can't reverse the tally haha, and that's no where close to all of the teams in EEA voting.

41-16 (no duplicates or teams out of this league counted in this tally)

Had to post that again for page rollover. Make it easier for Bort to see if he makes it back to this thread tonight.


42-16 now.

Bort, I would like some sort of confirmation.
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
edited for retort.
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 12:18:48
 
Link
 
Originally posted by bongbreath

Side note, Bort asked for a vote and this thread turned into a childish pissing match, thanks for making this thread unreadable children, you should have voted and allowed the process to work itself out.


You would appear to be no better than the "children" you speak of imo.
Should of just placed your vote instead of belittling people, child.
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by JcWildcat

Originally posted by JcWildcat


Bort, in case you see this thread, I tallied up as you asked to do in the EEA shuffle question thread.


Based it on teams in EEA as you asked in your OP, and did not count duplicates.


Thanks, will take a look.


Since he responded in my attempt to bring him back in this thread last night and did not comment in this thread about the tallies, I'm not sure what to think folks.
 
kswass
offline
Link
 
I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.

 
jonnyGoBlue
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kswass
I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



What would you have done differently and how would you be screwed over by a reshuffle now?
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Edited
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 12:19:11
 
KangarWhoDey
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kswass
I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



Since you're not an owner in this league, it really doesn't matter
 
Valenski
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KangarWhoDey
Originally posted by kswass

I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



Since you're not an owner in this league, it really doesn't matter


He doesnt have to be a owner if you read the original post it said owners AND GM's....I am the Owner for the Washington Wrath and he is one of my GM's and i agree with him we vote NO.

 
KangarWhoDey
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Valenski
Originally posted by KangarWhoDey

Originally posted by kswass


I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



Since you're not an owner in this league, it really doesn't matter


He doesnt have to be a owner if you read the original post it said owners AND GM's....I am the Owner for the Washington Wrath and he is one of my GM's and i agree with him we vote NO.



Actually, if you've been reading this thread, you'd see that the vote tally was done by counting owners, and not GMs.
 
head1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KangarWhoDey


Actually, if you've been reading this thread, you'd see that the vote tally was done by counting owners, and not GMs.


Originally posted by Bort

Please post a link to your team here if you approve of this, but ONLY if you're a team owner or GM in this league. Random players and people from other leagues need not apply. Thanks!


k
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 07:48:08
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KangarWhoDey
Originally posted by Valenski

Originally posted by KangarWhoDey


Originally posted by kswass



I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



Since you're not an owner in this league, it really doesn't matter


He doesnt have to be a owner if you read the original post it said owners AND GM's....I am the Owner for the Washington Wrath and he is one of my GM's and i agree with him we vote NO.



Actually, if you've been reading this thread, you'd see that the vote tally was done by counting owners, and not GMs.


It counted GM's if the owner had not voted. I did not count votes from the same team as we all know some teams stack up with GMs (and would therefore stack the ballot so to speak). So I did not count duplicates for the yes or no side. Also, did not count teams from other leagues, but did check the user to see if they GMed a team in this league (that had not submitted a vote)
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 07:53:05
 
KangarWhoDey
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JcWildcat

It counted GM's if the owner had not voted. I did not count votes from the same team as we all know some teams stack up with GMs (and would therefore stack the ballot so to speak). So I did not count duplicates for the yes or no side.


Gotcha

..My apologies guys..
Last edited Apr 9, 2009 08:06:53
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kswass
I vote NO

We would have done things differently if there was going to be another reshuffle.



I don't believe that team had a vote yet, which brings the tally to 42-17.

I didn't add it before b/c I'm about to give up if Bort's not going to come back in as he said he would last night (see quote above with Bort).
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.