Originally posted by Xars
Straightforwardly, it's not so much Cover 3 zone, but the matchup issue. CBs that are OOP playing LB slots are better than DTs playing there own slot. Is it a Zone problem or a matchup problem?
5-2 Cover 1 Net YPA of 5.85yds
5-2 Cover 2 Net YPA of 5.6yds
5-2 Cover 3 Net YPA of 5.41yds
3-4 Cover 3 Net YPA of 4.25yds
In essence, the two Cover 3 are the same play - both have 3 shallow and 3 deep zones. The 5-2 Cover 3 has DEs dropping back to cover the two shallow flats and they don't have an particular Pass Defense skills. But that's how the play is designed. The 3-4 has CBs playing OOP in LB shallow zones but so have Pass Coverage skills, though degraded by playing OOP.
Is it Zone, generally? Probably not.
Are the degraded Pass Coverage skills of CBs better than DEs? Probably.
Or is it specific to the 3-4 play somehow? Dunno.
Straightforwardly, it's not so much Cover 3 zone, but the matchup issue. CBs that are OOP playing LB slots are better than DTs playing there own slot. Is it a Zone problem or a matchup problem?
5-2 Cover 1 Net YPA of 5.85yds
5-2 Cover 2 Net YPA of 5.6yds
5-2 Cover 3 Net YPA of 5.41yds
3-4 Cover 3 Net YPA of 4.25yds
In essence, the two Cover 3 are the same play - both have 3 shallow and 3 deep zones. The 5-2 Cover 3 has DEs dropping back to cover the two shallow flats and they don't have an particular Pass Defense skills. But that's how the play is designed. The 3-4 has CBs playing OOP in LB shallow zones but so have Pass Coverage skills, though degraded by playing OOP.
Is it Zone, generally? Probably not.
Are the degraded Pass Coverage skills of CBs better than DEs? Probably.
Or is it specific to the 3-4 play somehow? Dunno.






























