Iowa MAY pass Whaley but the H-Town back is gonna go the fuck off, book it.
BuddyHorn
offline
offline
I could care less who wins the rush tittle. It is just fun to mess with sphere about
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Originally posted by HydrOshocK
Which one??
Either. Point is Iowa is going to take it in the ass this year by one of three other HBs.
And that's what he gets for naming his player after probably one of the gayest states in the Union.
Which one??
Either. Point is Iowa is going to take it in the ass this year by one of three other HBs.
And that's what he gets for naming his player after probably one of the gayest states in the Union.
Last edited Sep 1, 2008 09:49:37
HydrOshocK
offline
offline
LOL. Well I guess we could discuss "what ifs" all day long but I know one thing is fact. If I would've upped the carries for either one of our two backs this season instead of splitting them right down the middle there would be no discussion about Iowa Jones or Chris Whaley.
just sayin
just sayin
lawdawg95
offline
offline
Well he does have the highest per carry average in our conference. . . . . too bad he had to split 50-50 with our other HB 
Seriously though, both of those owners have been absolutely awesome this season, not bitching once in our forum or in PM to me about the split work load. They have both been 100% for the platoon situation and keeping a fresh back in the game at all times.
Seriously though, both of those owners have been absolutely awesome this season, not bitching once in our forum or in PM to me about the split work load. They have both been 100% for the platoon situation and keeping a fresh back in the game at all times.
BuddyHorn
offline
offline
Originally posted by HydrOshocK
LOL. Well I guess we could discuss "what ifs" all day long but I know one thing is fact. If I would've upped the carries for either one of our two backs this season instead of splitting them right down the middle there would be no discussion about Iowa Jones or Chris Whaley.
just sayin
lol. whaley splits as well
LOL. Well I guess we could discuss "what ifs" all day long but I know one thing is fact. If I would've upped the carries for either one of our two backs this season instead of splitting them right down the middle there would be no discussion about Iowa Jones or Chris Whaley.
just sayin
lol. whaley splits as well
HydrOshocK
offline
offline
Originally posted by BuddyHorn
Originally posted by HydrOshocK
LOL. Well I guess we could discuss "what ifs" all day long but I know one thing is fact. If I would've upped the carries for either one of our two backs this season instead of splitting them right down the middle there would be no discussion about Iowa Jones or Chris Whaley.
just sayin
lol. whaley splits as well
That is true but not quite as evenly. Whaley still gets the bulk of the work whereas both of my guys are almost dead even and still in the top 5. If I leaned one way or the other I'm pretty sure either one would be at the top.
Originally posted by HydrOshocK
LOL. Well I guess we could discuss "what ifs" all day long but I know one thing is fact. If I would've upped the carries for either one of our two backs this season instead of splitting them right down the middle there would be no discussion about Iowa Jones or Chris Whaley.
just sayin
lol. whaley splits as well
That is true but not quite as evenly. Whaley still gets the bulk of the work whereas both of my guys are almost dead even and still in the top 5. If I leaned one way or the other I'm pretty sure either one would be at the top.
HydrOshocK
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Well he does have the highest per carry average in our conference. . . . . too bad he had to split 50-50 with our other HB
Seriously though, both of those owners have been absolutely awesome this season, not bitching once in our forum or in PM to me about the split work load. They have both been 100% for the platoon situation and keeping a fresh back in the game at all times.
Same with our guys. I know Soul08 would love to have that rushing title for Kane but we've always been right down the middle with our backs and I wouldn't dare mess with our offensive chemistry by trying to push one guy harder just for an individual trophy. It's just too bad they don't give a team trophy for rushing.
Well he does have the highest per carry average in our conference. . . . . too bad he had to split 50-50 with our other HB
Seriously though, both of those owners have been absolutely awesome this season, not bitching once in our forum or in PM to me about the split work load. They have both been 100% for the platoon situation and keeping a fresh back in the game at all times.
Same with our guys. I know Soul08 would love to have that rushing title for Kane but we've always been right down the middle with our backs and I wouldn't dare mess with our offensive chemistry by trying to push one guy harder just for an individual trophy. It's just too bad they don't give a team trophy for rushing.
lawdawg95
offline
offline
The crazy thing is we have a #3 HB who I think would be right there in the mix of Top 5 HBs if HE was cut loose to.
We won't carry 3 HBs in Season 5, we've got a hell of a decision to make. At least we should get a good CB or LB out of this "problem"
We won't carry 3 HBs in Season 5, we've got a hell of a decision to make. At least we should get a good CB or LB out of this "problem"
HydrOshocK
offline
offline
Originally posted by lawdawg95
The crazy thing is we have a #3 HB who I think would be right there in the mix of Top 5 HBs if HE was cut loose to.
We won't carry 3 HBs in Season 5, we've got a hell of a decision to make. At least we should get a good CB or LB out of this "problem"
We were in the same boat last season. We went with a 3 back rotation and it worked for the most part but was way too unpredictable, and if one back had a bad game then it wasn't as easy to compensate. We dealt the 3rd HB in the offseason to get my LB back from the Brigade since we lost one to free agency and had to fill that spot. I'm glad we're back to a two back rotation now cuz it just seems to be more fluid.
The crazy thing is we have a #3 HB who I think would be right there in the mix of Top 5 HBs if HE was cut loose to.
We won't carry 3 HBs in Season 5, we've got a hell of a decision to make. At least we should get a good CB or LB out of this "problem"
We were in the same boat last season. We went with a 3 back rotation and it worked for the most part but was way too unpredictable, and if one back had a bad game then it wasn't as easy to compensate. We dealt the 3rd HB in the offseason to get my LB back from the Brigade since we lost one to free agency and had to fill that spot. I'm glad we're back to a two back rotation now cuz it just seems to be more fluid.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
