Stickman,
I concur - there is something flawed with the rankings. I, like most other, look forward to your rankings every week, and will continue to do so. But i thought your formulas from prior seasons were probably more accurate. Having said that, no matter how accurate your formulas get, you will never make all of us happy.
Some suggestions:
- Due to the pronounced diparity between the two conferences, i would suggest moving towards doing conference based rankings.
- How about implementing some of the more popular ranking formulas? Aikman's efficiency ratings come to mind and are known to be very accurate.