There should be a way to factor in avg level of opponent into the formula. Kinda like
like Strength of schedule
like Strength of schedule
CRich
offline
offline
Everyone knows the average level of players doesn't really matter. Were high enough in levels now that a well built 22 is better then a poorly built 26.
SAVAGE OPS
offline
offline
Originally posted by CRich
Everyone knows the average level of players doesn't really matter. Were high enough in levels now that a well built 22 is better then a poorly built 26.
I was thinking more of compensating for the gutted teams
Everyone knows the average level of players doesn't really matter. Were high enough in levels now that a well built 22 is better then a poorly built 26.
I was thinking more of compensating for the gutted teams
THESpideyWVU
offline
offline
I've been working on a way to adjust for strength of schedule, it mainly involves my laziness to not put all 32 schedules in...
Janda
offline
offline
Can't blame you for being lazy Spidey.
I'm too lazy to even come up with a decent thread.
Thanks for the list regardless if it's perfect or not.
I'm too lazy to even come up with a decent thread.
Thanks for the list regardless if it's perfect or not.
htm11
offline
offline
I like the fact that the list has both conferences ranked together. It's the first time we have had something like this.
THESpideyWVU
offline
offline
Originally posted by htm11
I like the fact that the list has both conferences ranked together. It's the first time we have had something like this.
Yea, I wanted to bring the West into it, us LEast guys are lazy.
I like the fact that the list has both conferences ranked together. It's the first time we have had something like this.
Yea, I wanted to bring the West into it, us LEast guys are lazy.
Victory Jones
offline
offline
Originally posted by im4ut999
Interesting that Buffalo tops Austin, while Spicewood beat Buffalo and got pounded by Austin...
Maybe there's a math mistake in your equations somewhere...
Buffalo hasnt been pounded by anyone...
we havent even played Austin.
oh wait...
you got pounded by Austin, not us...
Interesting that Buffalo tops Austin, while Spicewood beat Buffalo and got pounded by Austin...
Maybe there's a math mistake in your equations somewhere...
Buffalo hasnt been pounded by anyone...
we havent even played Austin.
oh wait...
you got pounded by Austin, not us...
Last edited Aug 16, 2008 08:04:59
Codydog
offline
offline
Vic,
I think im4ut999 is saying we shouldn't be above Austin. For Spicewood defeated us, while getting pounded by Austin, making the natural progression:
Austin
Spicewood
Buffalo
LVS
my two cents to avoid name-calling.
I think im4ut999 is saying we shouldn't be above Austin. For Spicewood defeated us, while getting pounded by Austin, making the natural progression:
Austin
Spicewood
Buffalo
LVS
my two cents to avoid name-calling.
Last edited Aug 15, 2008 07:23:48
Victory Jones
offline
offline
Originally posted by Codydog
Vic,
I think im4ut999 is saying we shouldn't be above Austin. For Spicewood defeated us, while getting pounded by Austin, making the natural progression:
Austin
Spicewood
Buffalo
LVS
my two cents to avoid name-calling.
thats cool...
it should probably go
Austin
Oakland
Spiceworld
Buffalo
but it doesnt really matter...
this second half of the season will separate the wheat from the chaffe...
Vic,
I think im4ut999 is saying we shouldn't be above Austin. For Spicewood defeated us, while getting pounded by Austin, making the natural progression:
Austin
Spicewood
Buffalo
LVS
my two cents to avoid name-calling.
thats cool...
it should probably go
Austin
Oakland
Spiceworld
Buffalo
but it doesnt really matter...
this second half of the season will separate the wheat from the chaffe...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
